PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CIAI.TO vs. CHPS.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

CIAI.TO vs. CHPS.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in CI Global Artificial Intelligence ETF (CIAI.TO) and Global X Artificial Intelligence Semiconductor Index ETF (CHPS.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

CIAI.TO vs. CHPS.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
CIAI.TO
CI Global Artificial Intelligence ETF
-5.51%18.84%29.92%
CHPS.TO
Global X Artificial Intelligence Semiconductor Index ETF
6.25%45.93%2.46%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CIAI.TO achieves a -5.51% return, which is significantly lower than CHPS.TO's 6.25% return.


CIAI.TO

1D
5.06%
1M
-3.65%
YTD
-5.51%
6M
-6.22%
1Y
34.50%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CHPS.TO

1D
5.64%
1M
-2.54%
YTD
6.25%
6M
12.90%
1Y
74.89%
3Y*
34.79%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


CIAI.TO vs. CHPS.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

CIAI.TO has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than CHPS.TO's 0.63% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

CIAI.TO vs. CHPS.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CIAI.TO
CIAI.TO Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
CIAI.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CIAI.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
CIAI.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
CIAI.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
CIAI.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

CHPS.TO
CHPS.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
CHPS.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CHPS.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
CHPS.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
CHPS.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
CHPS.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CIAI.TO vs. CHPS.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CI Global Artificial Intelligence ETF (CIAI.TO) and Global X Artificial Intelligence Semiconductor Index ETF (CHPS.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CIAI.TOCHPS.TODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.13

1.98

-0.86

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.65

2.58

-0.92

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.37

-0.14

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.81

4.78

-2.97

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.11

15.10

-9.99

CIAI.TO vs. CHPS.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CIAI.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.13, which is lower than the CHPS.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CIAI.TO and CHPS.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CIAI.TOCHPS.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.13

1.98

-0.86

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.77

0.60

+0.17

Correlation

The correlation between CIAI.TO and CHPS.TO is 0.84, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

CIAI.TO vs. CHPS.TO - Dividend Comparison

CIAI.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CHPS.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%.


TTM20252024202320222021
CIAI.TO
CI Global Artificial Intelligence ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
CHPS.TO
Global X Artificial Intelligence Semiconductor Index ETF
0.01%0.01%0.20%0.53%0.97%0.01%

Drawdowns

CIAI.TO vs. CHPS.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CIAI.TO drawdown since its inception was -31.22%, smaller than the maximum CHPS.TO drawdown of -48.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CIAI.TO and CHPS.TO.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


CIAI.TOCHPS.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.22%

-48.16%

+16.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.93%

-15.68%

-3.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.83%

-7.93%

-6.90%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.86%

-14.36%

+7.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.69%

4.96%

+1.73%

Volatility

CIAI.TO vs. CHPS.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for CI Global Artificial Intelligence ETF (CIAI.TO) is 10.01%, while Global X Artificial Intelligence Semiconductor Index ETF (CHPS.TO) has a volatility of 12.07%. This indicates that CIAI.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CHPS.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


CIAI.TOCHPS.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.01%

12.07%

-2.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.28%

24.85%

-5.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

30.74%

37.95%

-7.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.71%

33.66%

-4.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.71%

33.66%

-4.95%