DGP vs. ZSL
DGP (DB Gold Double Long Exchange Traded Notes) and ZSL (ProShares UltraShort Silver) are both exchange-traded funds - DGP is a Leveraged Commodities fund tracking the Deutsche Bank Liquid Commodity Index-Optimum Yield Gold (200%), while ZSL is a Silver fund tracking the Bloomberg Silver Subindex (-2x). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, DGP returned 16.18%/yr vs -38.80%/yr for ZSL. At a correlation of -0.77, they often move in opposite directions. DGP charges 0.75%/yr vs 1.32%/yr for ZSL.
Performance
DGP vs. ZSL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DGP achieves a -19.95% return, which is significantly higher than ZSL's -40.11% return. Over the past 10 years, DGP has outperformed ZSL with an annualized return of 16.18%, while ZSL has yielded a comparatively lower -38.80% annualized return.
DGP
- 1D
- -4.99%
- 1M
- -11.04%
- 6M
- -29.70%
- YTD
- -19.95%
- 1Y
- 24.83%
- 3Y*
- 46.51%
- 5Y*
- 26.51%
- 10Y*
- 16.18%
ZSL
- 1D
- 6.92%
- 1M
- 31.50%
- 6M
- -6.76%
- YTD
- -40.11%
- 1Y
- -85.47%
- 3Y*
- -63.93%
- 5Y*
- -48.95%
- 10Y*
- -38.80%
DGP vs. ZSL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DGP DB Gold Double Long Exchange Traded Notes | -19.95% | 141.40% | 53.16% | 16.97% | -5.54% | -11.29% | 45.29% | 32.27% | -7.48% | 24.20% |
ZSL ProShares UltraShort Silver | -40.11% | -87.29% | -42.43% | -5.49% | -28.09% | -2.04% | -74.44% | -27.76% | 18.15% | -18.99% |
Correlation
The correlation between DGP and ZSL is -0.81, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.81 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.75 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.75 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.74 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 2008 | -0.77 |
The correlation between DGP and ZSL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.81 to -0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DGP vs. ZSL — Risk / Return Rank
DGP
ZSL
DGP vs. ZSL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DB Gold Double Long Exchange Traded Notes (DGP) and ProShares UltraShort Silver (ZSL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DGP | ZSL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.14 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.45 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 0.84 | +0.29 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.53 | -0.91 | +1.44 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.27 | -1.19 | +2.46 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DGP vs. ZSL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DGP drawdown since its inception was -75.31%, smaller than the maximum ZSL drawdown of -100.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DGP and ZSL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DGP | ZSL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -75.31% | -100.00% | +24.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -46.98% | -93.81% | +46.83% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -46.98% | -98.40% | +51.42% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -51.24% | -99.06% | +47.82% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -51.24% | -99.82% | +48.58% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -46.73% | -99.99% | +53.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -41.09% | -96.39% | +55.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 19.56% | 71.67% | -52.11% |
Volatility
DGP vs. ZSL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for DB Gold Double Long Exchange Traded Notes (DGP) is 16.07%, while ProShares UltraShort Silver (ZSL) has a volatility of 28.50%. This indicates that DGP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ZSL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DGP | ZSL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.07% | 28.50% | -12.43% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 48.64% | 102.91% | -54.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 55.50% | 123.96% | -68.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 39.56% | 75.52% | -35.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 35.41% | 65.88% | -30.47% |
DGP vs. ZSL - Expense Ratio Comparison
DGP has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than ZSL's 1.32% expense ratio.
Dividends
DGP vs. ZSL - Dividend Comparison
Neither DGP nor ZSL has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
DGP and ZSL have a correlation of -0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ZSL has higher volatility (28.50%) compared to DGP (16.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DGP dropped -75.31% vs ZSL's -100.00%.
On 10-year performance, DGP leads with 16.18% vs -38.80% for ZSL. On fees, DGP is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, DGP has been the lower-risk option at 16.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, DGP has performed better with a 16.18% return vs -38.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DGP is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.32% for ZSL.
DGP and ZSL have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
DGP is categorized as Leveraged Commodities, while ZSL is Silver. DGP tracks Deutsche Bank Liquid Commodity Index-Optimum Yield Gold (200%), while ZSL tracks Bloomberg Silver Subindex (-2x). They also come from different issuers: Deutsche Bank and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for DGP and 1.32% for ZSL.
DGP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.45 vs -0.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DGP and ZSL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer