DGLRX vs. GIDGX
DGLRX (BNY Mellon Global Stock Fund) and GIDGX (Goldman Sachs Enhanced Dividend Global Equity Portfolio) are both Global Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, DGLRX returned 11.31%/yr vs 11.22%/yr for GIDGX. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DGLRX charges 0.89%/yr vs 0.17%/yr for GIDGX.
Performance
DGLRX vs. GIDGX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DGLRX achieves a 1.05% return, which is significantly lower than GIDGX's 11.86% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with DGLRX having a 11.31% annualized return and GIDGX not far behind at 11.22%.
DGLRX
- 1D
- -0.76%
- 1M
- -0.41%
- YTD
- 1.05%
- 6M
- 0.29%
- 1Y
- 5.89%
- 3Y*
- 11.09%
- 5Y*
- 6.65%
- 10Y*
- 11.31%
GIDGX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 1.78%
- YTD
- 11.86%
- 6M
- 11.14%
- 1Y
- 24.70%
- 3Y*
- 19.01%
- 5Y*
- 11.14%
- 10Y*
- 11.22%
DGLRX vs. GIDGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DGLRX BNY Mellon Global Stock Fund | 1.05% | 8.59% | 17.14% | 21.48% | -19.14% | 17.63% | 19.50% | 29.57% | -1.69% | 24.22% |
GIDGX Goldman Sachs Enhanced Dividend Global Equity Portfolio | 11.86% | 15.74% | 20.59% | 17.92% | -12.75% | 18.46% | 8.41% | 19.97% | -8.26% | 15.18% |
Correlation
The correlation between DGLRX and GIDGX is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2009 | 0.87 |
The correlation between DGLRX and GIDGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DGLRX vs. GIDGX — Risk / Return Rank
DGLRX
GIDGX
DGLRX vs. GIDGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon Global Stock Fund (DGLRX) and Goldman Sachs Enhanced Dividend Global Equity Portfolio (GIDGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DGLRX | GIDGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.00 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.71 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 1.49 | -0.39 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.63 | 3.62 | -2.99 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.02 | 17.04 | -15.02 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DGLRX vs. GIDGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DGLRX drawdown since its inception was -43.83%, which is greater than GIDGX's maximum drawdown of -31.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DGLRX and GIDGX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DGLRX | GIDGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.83% | -31.63% | -12.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.27% | -7.14% | -4.13% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.00% | -14.69% | -1.31% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.20% | -20.39% | -8.81% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -29.20% | -31.63% | +2.43% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.90% | 0.00% | -2.90% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.95% | -3.86% | -2.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.48% | 1.51% | +1.97% |
Volatility
DGLRX vs. GIDGX - Volatility Comparison
BNY Mellon Global Stock Fund (DGLRX) has a higher volatility of 4.39% compared to Goldman Sachs Enhanced Dividend Global Equity Portfolio (GIDGX) at 3.72%. This indicates that DGLRX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GIDGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DGLRX | GIDGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.39% | 3.72% | +0.67% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.21% | 8.35% | +1.86% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.79% | 10.15% | +2.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.59% | 13.05% | +3.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.66% | 14.18% | +2.48% |
DGLRX vs. GIDGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
DGLRX has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than GIDGX's 0.17% expense ratio.
Dividends
DGLRX vs. GIDGX - Dividend Comparison
DGLRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 30.69%, more than GIDGX's 5.52% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DGLRX BNY Mellon Global Stock Fund | 30.69% | 30.57% | 17.41% | 17.89% | 11.97% | 8.65% | 5.71% | 5.00% | 7.11% | 8.01% | 3.83% | 6.46% |
GIDGX Goldman Sachs Enhanced Dividend Global Equity Portfolio | 5.52% | 5.92% | 12.06% | 4.32% | 8.89% | 8.41% | 1.99% | 4.85% | 5.67% | 3.35% | 2.97% | 3.21% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DGLRX and GIDGX have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DGLRX has higher volatility (4.39%) compared to GIDGX (3.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DGLRX dropped -43.83% vs GIDGX's -31.63%.
GIDGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.55 vs 0.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DGLRX and GIDGX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer