PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DGIN vs. UGA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DGIN vs. UGA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Digital India ETF (DGIN) and United States Gasoline Fund LP (UGA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DGIN achieves a -16.15% return, which is significantly lower than UGA's 70.69% return.


DGIN

1D
1.56%
1M
1.37%
YTD
-16.15%
6M
-17.49%
1Y
-17.11%
3Y*
5.31%
5Y*
10Y*

UGA

1D
-2.73%
1M
-12.25%
YTD
70.69%
6M
59.72%
1Y
79.48%
3Y*
20.80%
5Y*
24.41%
10Y*
14.27%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DGIN vs. UGA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
DGIN
VanEck Digital India ETF
-16.15%-6.00%22.56%30.30%-21.84%
UGA
United States Gasoline Fund LP
70.69%-2.00%3.77%1.27%21.88%

Correlation

The correlation between DGIN and UGA is -0.27, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.27

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.10

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 18, 2022

-0.02

Over the past year, the inverse relationship between DGIN and UGA has strengthened: their correlation has moved from -0.02 to -0.27, meaning they now move in opposite directions more often than their long-term average.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DGIN vs. UGA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DGIN
DGIN Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
DGIN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DGIN Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
DGIN Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
DGIN Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
DGIN Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank

UGA
UGA Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
UGA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UGA Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
UGA Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
UGA Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
UGA Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DGIN vs. UGA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Digital India ETF (DGIN) and United States Gasoline Fund LP (UGA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DGINUGADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.00

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.86

1.37

-0.51

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.56

5.37

-5.93

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.22

12.86

-14.08

DGIN vs. UGA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DGIN Sharpe Ratio is -0.94, which is lower than the UGA Sharpe Ratio of 2.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DGIN and UGA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DGINUGADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.94

2.27

-3.21

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.38

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.02

0.12

-0.14

Drawdowns

DGIN vs. UGA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DGIN drawdown since its inception was -33.65%, smaller than the maximum UGA drawdown of -86.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DGIN and UGA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DGINUGADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.65%

-86.59%

+52.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-30.49%

-14.88%

-15.61%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-33.65%

-26.68%

-6.97%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.11%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-75.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-24.87%

-14.75%

-10.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.30%

-36.76%

+23.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

14.01%

6.20%

+7.81%

Volatility

DGIN vs. UGA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VanEck Digital India ETF (DGIN) is 6.26%, while United States Gasoline Fund LP (UGA) has a volatility of 11.64%. This indicates that DGIN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UGA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DGINUGADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.26%

11.64%

-5.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.63%

30.48%

-14.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.38%

35.27%

-16.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.90%

34.40%

-15.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.90%

37.27%

-18.37%

DGIN vs. UGA - Expense Ratio Comparison

DGIN has a 0.76% expense ratio, which is higher than UGA's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

DGIN vs. UGA - Dividend Comparison

DGIN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.27%, while UGA has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
DGIN
VanEck Digital India ETF
2.27%1.90%0.00%0.24%0.97%
UGA
United States Gasoline Fund LP
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


DGIN and UGA have a correlation of -0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

UGA has higher volatility (11.64%) compared to DGIN (6.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DGIN dropped -33.65% vs UGA's -86.59%.

On 3-year performance, UGA leads with 20.80% vs 5.31% for DGIN. On fees, UGA is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, DGIN has been the lower-risk option at 6.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, UGA has performed better with a 20.80% return vs 5.31%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

UGA is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.76% for DGIN.

DGIN has the higher dividend yield at 2.27%, compared with 0.00% for UGA.

DGIN is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while UGA is Oil & Gas. DGIN tracks MVIS Digital India, while UGA tracks Front Month Unleaded Gasoline. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Concierge Technologies. Their fees differ too: 0.76% for DGIN and 0.75% for UGA.

UGA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.27 vs -0.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DGIN and UGA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer