PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DGIFX vs. CMALX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DGIFX vs. CMALX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Disciplined Growth Investors Fund (DGIFX) and Crawford Multi-Asset Income Fund (CMALX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DGIFX achieves a 13.57% return, which is significantly higher than CMALX's 8.89% return.


DGIFX

1D
-0.81%
1M
-0.41%
6M
9.06%
YTD
13.57%
1Y
16.83%
3Y*
13.46%
5Y*
9.63%
10Y*
11.91%

CMALX

1D
-0.04%
1M
1.57%
6M
6.38%
YTD
8.89%
1Y
10.78%
3Y*
10.26%
5Y*
6.80%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DGIFX vs. CMALX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DGIFX
Disciplined Growth Investors Fund
13.57%3.54%21.13%33.10%-18.35%9.59%24.07%23.97%-2.39%7.42%
CMALX
Crawford Multi-Asset Income Fund
8.89%5.26%11.36%6.42%-0.99%15.89%-7.01%20.24%-4.85%0.14%

Correlation

The correlation between DGIFX and CMALX is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.20

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.35

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 12, 2017

0.58

Over the past year, the correlation between DGIFX and CMALX has dropped to 0.20 - well below their long-term average of 0.58, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DGIFX vs. CMALX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DGIFX
DGIFX Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
DGIFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DGIFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
DGIFX Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
DGIFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
DGIFX Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank

CMALX
CMALX Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
CMALX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CMALX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
CMALX Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
CMALX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
CMALX Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DGIFX vs. CMALX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Disciplined Growth Investors Fund (DGIFX) and Crawford Multi-Asset Income Fund (CMALX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DGIFXCMALXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.74

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.32

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.60

2.47

-0.87

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.78

7.84

-3.05

DGIFX vs. CMALX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DGIFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.07, which is lower than the CMALX Sharpe Ratio of 1.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DGIFX and CMALX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DGIFX vs. CMALX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DGIFX drawdown since its inception was -30.93%, smaller than the maximum CMALX drawdown of -39.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DGIFX and CMALX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DGIFXCMALXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.93%

-39.04%

+8.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.91%

-4.49%

-6.42%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.93%

-7.66%

-23.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.93%

-12.68%

-18.25%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.30%

-0.36%

-2.94%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.87%

-3.71%

-2.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.63%

1.41%

+2.22%

Volatility

DGIFX vs. CMALX - Volatility Comparison

Disciplined Growth Investors Fund (DGIFX) has a higher volatility of 4.77% compared to Crawford Multi-Asset Income Fund (CMALX) at 2.48%. This indicates that DGIFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CMALX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DGIFXCMALXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.77%

2.48%

+2.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.27%

4.78%

+7.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.24%

6.18%

+10.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.24%

9.00%

+12.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.69%

12.60%

+6.09%

DGIFX vs. CMALX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DGIFX has a 0.78% expense ratio, which is lower than CMALX's 1.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

DGIFX vs. CMALX - Dividend Comparison

DGIFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.28%, more than CMALX's 7.15% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
CMALX
Crawford Multi-Asset Income Fund
7.15%7.61%3.94%4.66%4.93%3.21%3.67%5.07%4.87%0.99%
DGIFX
Disciplined Growth Investors Fund
7.28%8.29%20.95%2.78%2.21%11.12%10.09%3.53%3.74%4.29%

Frequently Asked Questions


DGIFX and CMALX have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DGIFX has higher volatility (4.77%) compared to CMALX (2.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DGIFX dropped -30.93% vs CMALX's -39.04%.

CMALX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.81 vs 1.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DGIFX and CMALX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer