DGFFX vs. SABA

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

DGFFX (Destinations Global Fixed Income Opportunities Fund) and SABA (Saba Capital Income & Opportunities Fund II) are both Global Bonds funds. Over the past 5 years, DGFFX returned 3.83%/yr vs 3.61%/yr for SABA. At a 0.23 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

DGFFX vs. SABA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Destinations Global Fixed Income Opportunities Fund (DGFFX) and Saba Capital Income & Opportunities Fund II (SABA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DGFFX achieves a 3.13% return, which is significantly lower than SABA's 6.04% return.

DGFFX

• 1D: 0.21%
• 1M: 0.25%
• 6M: 2.47%
• YTD: 3.13%
• 1Y: 6.33%
• 3Y*: 7.26%
• 5Y*: 3.83%
• 10Y*: —

SABA

• 1D: -0.12%
• 1M: 0.83%
• 6M: 4.54%
• YTD: 6.04%
• 1Y: -0.28%
• 3Y*: 9.09%
• 5Y*: 3.61%
• 10Y*: 2.82%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DGFFX vs. SABA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
DGFFX Destinations Global Fixed Income Opportunities Fund	3.13%	5.84%	8.04%	7.82%	-6.09%	4.91%	3.59%	6.64%	-0.35%	3.57%
SABA Saba Capital Income & Opportunities Fund II	6.04%	-0.31%	31.32%	-2.77%	-9.02%	1.05%	-6.63%	8.55%	-1.25%	1.19%

Correlation

The correlation between DGFFX and SABA is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.28
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.26
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.28
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 20, 2017	0.23

Return for Risk

DGFFX vs. SABA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DGFFX

DGFFX Risk / Return Rank: 98
DGFFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
DGFFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
DGFFX Omega Ratio Rank: 98
DGFFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
DGFFX Martin Ratio Rank: 98

SABA

SABA Risk / Return Rank: 3
SABA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
SABA Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
SABA Omega Ratio Rank: 3
SABA Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
SABA Martin Ratio Rank: 3

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DGFFX vs. SABA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Destinations Global Fixed Income Opportunities Fund (DGFFX) and Saba Capital Income & Opportunities Fund II (SABA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DGFFX	SABA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.83	-0.02	+3.85
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	6.27	0.06	+6.22
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.93	1.01	+0.92
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	6.55	-0.03	+6.58
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	29.94	-0.05	+29.99

DGFFX vs. SABA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DGFFX Sharpe Ratio is 3.83, which is higher than the SABA Sharpe Ratio of -0.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DGFFX and SABA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

DGFFX vs. SABA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DGFFX drawdown since its inception was -12.69%, smaller than the maximum SABA drawdown of -32.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DGFFX and SABA.

Drawdown Indicators

	DGFFX	SABA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-12.69%	-32.37%	+19.68%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.19%	-10.45%	+9.26%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-3.38%	-14.96%	+11.58%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-8.17%	-19.76%	+11.59%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-31.39%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-3.12%	+3.12%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.31%	-7.56%	+6.25%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.24%	5.52%	-5.28%

Volatility

DGFFX vs. SABA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Destinations Global Fixed Income Opportunities Fund (DGFFX) is 0.49%, while Saba Capital Income & Opportunities Fund II (SABA) has a volatility of 3.10%. This indicates that DGFFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SABA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DGFFX	SABA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.49%	3.10%	-2.61%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.49%	8.41%	-6.92%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.04%	11.87%	-9.83%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	2.43%	14.60%	-12.17%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	2.59%	16.63%	-14.04%

Dividends

DGFFX vs. SABA - Dividend Comparison

DGFFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.81%, less than SABA's 9.56% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DGFFX Destinations Global Fixed Income Opportunities Fund	6.81%	5.52%	6.81%	4.95%	3.37%	4.14%	4.22%	4.18%	3.79%	2.94%	0.00%	0.00%
SABA Saba Capital Income & Opportunities Fund II	9.56%	9.65%	8.32%	11.43%	9.14%	7.19%	4.00%	6.68%	5.81%	4.44%	4.63%	4.72%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DGFFX and SABA in my portfolio?

DGFFX and SABA have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DGFFX or SABA?

SABA has higher volatility (3.10%) compared to DGFFX (0.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DGFFX dropped -12.69% vs SABA's -32.37%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DGFFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.83 vs -0.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.