PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DGFFX vs. SABA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DGFFX vs. SABA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Destinations Global Fixed Income Opportunities Fund (DGFFX) and Saba Capital Income & Opportunities Fund II (SABA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DGFFX achieves a 2.66% return, which is significantly lower than SABA's 2.89% return.


DGFFX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.61%
YTD
2.66%
6M
2.73%
1Y
5.84%
3Y*
7.32%
5Y*
3.75%
10Y*

SABA

1D
-0.37%
1M
-2.54%
YTD
2.89%
6M
1.91%
1Y
-1.67%
3Y*
9.11%
5Y*
2.97%
10Y*
2.80%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DGFFX vs. SABA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DGFFX
Destinations Global Fixed Income Opportunities Fund
2.66%5.84%8.04%7.82%-6.09%4.91%3.59%6.64%-0.35%3.57%
SABA
Saba Capital Income & Opportunities Fund II
2.89%-0.31%31.32%-2.77%-9.02%1.05%-6.63%8.55%-1.25%1.19%

Correlation

The correlation between DGFFX and SABA is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.26

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.26

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 20, 2017

0.23

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DGFFX vs. SABA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DGFFX
DGFFX Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
DGFFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DGFFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
DGFFX Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
DGFFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
DGFFX Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank

SABA
SABA Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
SABA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SABA Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
SABA Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
SABA Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
SABA Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DGFFX vs. SABA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Destinations Global Fixed Income Opportunities Fund (DGFFX) and Saba Capital Income & Opportunities Fund II (SABA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DGFFXSABADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+3.79

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+5.99

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.87

0.99

+0.89

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.34

-0.16

+6.50

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

28.67

-0.31

+28.97

DGFFX vs. SABA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DGFFX Sharpe Ratio is 3.65, which is higher than the SABA Sharpe Ratio of -0.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DGFFX and SABA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DGFFX vs. SABA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DGFFX drawdown since its inception was -12.69%, smaller than the maximum SABA drawdown of -32.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DGFFX and SABA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DGFFXSABADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.69%

-32.37%

+19.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.19%

-10.45%

+9.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.38%

-14.96%

+11.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-8.17%

-19.76%

+11.59%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.21%

-6.00%

+5.79%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.32%

-7.56%

+6.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.24%

5.42%

-5.18%

Volatility

DGFFX vs. SABA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Destinations Global Fixed Income Opportunities Fund (DGFFX) is 0.62%, while Saba Capital Income & Opportunities Fund II (SABA) has a volatility of 2.98%. This indicates that DGFFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SABA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DGFFXSABADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.62%

2.98%

-2.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.47%

8.25%

-6.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.07%

11.69%

-9.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.42%

14.58%

-12.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.60%

16.65%

-14.05%

Dividends

DGFFX vs. SABA - Dividend Comparison

DGFFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.24%, less than SABA's 9.78% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DGFFX
Destinations Global Fixed Income Opportunities Fund
6.24%5.52%6.81%4.95%3.37%4.14%4.22%4.18%3.79%2.94%0.00%0.00%
SABA
Saba Capital Income & Opportunities Fund II
9.78%9.65%8.32%11.43%9.14%7.19%4.00%6.68%5.81%4.44%4.63%4.72%

Frequently Asked Questions


DGFFX and SABA have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SABA has higher volatility (2.98%) compared to DGFFX (0.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DGFFX dropped -12.69% vs SABA's -32.37%.

DGFFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.65 vs -0.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DGFFX and SABA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer