PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DGFAX vs. RPFCX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DGFAX vs. RPFCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Davis Global Fund (DGFAX) and Davis Appreciation & Income Fund (RPFCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DGFAX achieves a -2.17% return, which is significantly lower than RPFCX's 9.59% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with DGFAX having a 10.83% annualized return and RPFCX not far behind at 10.66%.


DGFAX

1D
-1.07%
1M
-2.23%
YTD
-2.17%
6M
-2.46%
1Y
14.17%
3Y*
18.80%
5Y*
5.44%
10Y*
10.83%

RPFCX

1D
-0.16%
1M
0.76%
YTD
9.59%
6M
9.03%
1Y
22.74%
3Y*
17.42%
5Y*
9.36%
10Y*
10.66%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DGFAX vs. RPFCX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DGFAX
Davis Global Fund
-2.17%31.85%22.59%17.22%-16.53%-5.15%23.06%31.61%-20.73%33.33%
RPFCX
Davis Appreciation & Income Fund
9.59%20.90%9.10%23.00%-15.65%25.74%4.74%20.33%-8.02%16.35%

Correlation

The correlation between DGFAX and RPFCX is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.70

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.76

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 23, 2004

0.79

The correlation between DGFAX and RPFCX shifts across timeframes, from 0.70 (1 year) to 0.82 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DGFAX vs. RPFCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DGFAX
DGFAX Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
DGFAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DGFAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
DGFAX Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
DGFAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
DGFAX Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

RPFCX
RPFCX Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
RPFCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RPFCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
RPFCX Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
RPFCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
RPFCX Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DGFAX vs. RPFCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Davis Global Fund (DGFAX) and Davis Appreciation & Income Fund (RPFCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DGFAXRPFCXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.53

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.25

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.48

-0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.30

3.60

-2.29

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.30

13.86

-9.56

DGFAX vs. RPFCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DGFAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.14, which is lower than the RPFCX Sharpe Ratio of 2.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DGFAX and RPFCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DGFAX vs. RPFCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DGFAX drawdown since its inception was -65.64%, which is greater than RPFCX's maximum drawdown of -56.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DGFAX and RPFCX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DGFAXRPFCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-65.64%

-56.39%

-9.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.72%

-6.76%

-5.96%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.92%

-14.82%

-2.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.51%

-25.63%

-13.88%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.47%

-30.72%

-11.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.91%

-0.88%

-5.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.66%

-7.42%

-7.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.85%

1.75%

+2.10%

Volatility

DGFAX vs. RPFCX - Volatility Comparison

Davis Global Fund (DGFAX) has a higher volatility of 4.69% compared to Davis Appreciation & Income Fund (RPFCX) at 2.69%. This indicates that DGFAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RPFCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DGFAXRPFCXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.69%

2.69%

+2.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.14%

6.79%

+4.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.60%

9.12%

+5.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.52%

14.10%

+6.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.94%

14.77%

+5.17%

DGFAX vs. RPFCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DGFAX has a 0.96% expense ratio, which is lower than RPFCX's 1.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

DGFAX vs. RPFCX - Dividend Comparison

DGFAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.01%, more than RPFCX's 5.89% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DGFAX
Davis Global Fund
8.01%7.83%13.06%1.07%0.00%11.55%0.27%1.88%9.25%0.00%0.00%6.12%
RPFCX
Davis Appreciation & Income Fund
5.89%6.09%1.11%2.91%2.63%0.28%0.78%2.03%1.09%0.83%1.09%1.19%

Frequently Asked Questions


DGFAX and RPFCX have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DGFAX has higher volatility (4.69%) compared to RPFCX (2.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DGFAX dropped -65.64% vs RPFCX's -56.39%.

RPFCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.67 vs 1.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DGFAX and RPFCX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer