PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DGFAX vs. PGVFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DGFAX vs. PGVFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Davis Global Fund (DGFAX) and Polaris Global Value Fund (PGVFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DGFAX achieves a 3.43% return, which is significantly lower than PGVFX's 19.15% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with DGFAX having a 10.95% annualized return and PGVFX not far behind at 10.84%.


DGFAX

1D
1.75%
1M
4.56%
YTD
3.43%
6M
7.01%
1Y
24.56%
3Y*
21.38%
5Y*
6.01%
10Y*
10.95%

PGVFX

1D
-0.27%
1M
5.09%
YTD
19.15%
6M
23.38%
1Y
38.30%
3Y*
21.45%
5Y*
9.40%
10Y*
10.84%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DGFAX vs. PGVFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DGFAX
Davis Global Fund
3.43%31.85%22.59%17.22%-16.53%-5.15%23.06%31.61%-20.73%33.33%
PGVFX
Polaris Global Value Fund
19.15%27.01%5.33%14.76%-12.00%15.38%6.65%22.83%-12.64%20.60%

Correlation

The correlation between DGFAX and PGVFX is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.63

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.69

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.74

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 27, 2004

0.79

The correlation between DGFAX and PGVFX shifts across timeframes, from 0.62 (1 year) to 0.79 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DGFAX vs. PGVFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DGFAX
DGFAX Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
DGFAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DGFAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
DGFAX Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
DGFAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
DGFAX Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

PGVFX
PGVFX Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
PGVFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PGVFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
PGVFX Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
PGVFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
PGVFX Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DGFAX vs. PGVFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Davis Global Fund (DGFAX) and Polaris Global Value Fund (PGVFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DGFAXPGVFXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.79

3.29

-1.50

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.44

4.61

-2.17

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.63

-0.30

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.94

4.35

-2.41

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.57

15.75

-9.18

DGFAX vs. PGVFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DGFAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.79, which is lower than the PGVFX Sharpe Ratio of 3.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DGFAX and PGVFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DGFAXPGVFXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.79

3.29

-1.50

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.29

0.68

-0.39

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

0.69

-0.14

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.43

0.49

-0.06

Drawdowns

DGFAX vs. PGVFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DGFAX drawdown since its inception was -65.64%, roughly equal to the maximum PGVFX drawdown of -68.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DGFAX and PGVFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DGFAXPGVFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-65.64%

-68.09%

+2.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.72%

-8.76%

-3.96%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.92%

-12.53%

-4.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.84%

-27.58%

-13.26%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.47%

-41.26%

-1.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.27%

+0.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.69%

-11.30%

-3.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.75%

2.42%

+1.33%

Volatility

DGFAX vs. PGVFX - Volatility Comparison

Davis Global Fund (DGFAX) and Polaris Global Value Fund (PGVFX) have volatilities of 4.27% and 4.15%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DGFAXPGVFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.27%

4.15%

+0.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.66%

9.55%

+1.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.37%

11.77%

+2.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.49%

13.80%

+6.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.98%

15.87%

+4.11%

DGFAX vs. PGVFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DGFAX has a 0.96% expense ratio, which is lower than PGVFX's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

DGFAX vs. PGVFX - Dividend Comparison

DGFAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.57%, more than PGVFX's 4.34% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DGFAX
Davis Global Fund
7.57%7.83%13.06%1.07%0.00%11.55%0.27%1.88%9.25%0.00%0.00%6.12%
PGVFX
Polaris Global Value Fund
4.34%5.17%5.65%1.68%3.55%4.05%1.55%3.69%3.39%1.50%1.32%1.26%

Frequently Asked Questions


DGFAX and PGVFX have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DGFAX has higher volatility (4.27%) compared to PGVFX (4.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DGFAX dropped -65.64% vs PGVFX's -68.09%.

PGVFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.29 vs 1.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DGFAX and PGVFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer