PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DGCB vs. DFEV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DGCB vs. DFEV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dimensional Global Credit ETF (DGCB) and Dimensional Emerging Markets Value ETF (DFEV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DGCB achieves a 1.22% return, which is significantly lower than DFEV's 29.46% return.


DGCB

1D
-0.20%
1M
0.84%
YTD
1.22%
6M
1.01%
1Y
6.04%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

DFEV

1D
-1.36%
1M
9.10%
YTD
29.46%
6M
32.40%
1Y
57.15%
3Y*
25.84%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DGCB vs. DFEV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
DGCB
Dimensional Global Credit ETF
1.22%6.68%3.80%6.14%
DFEV
Dimensional Emerging Markets Value ETF
29.46%32.54%7.26%8.27%

Correlation

The correlation between DGCB and DFEV is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.42

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 9, 2023

0.29

The correlation between DGCB and DFEV shifts across timeframes, from 0.29 (all time) to 0.42 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DGCB vs. DFEV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DGCB
DGCB Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
DGCB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DGCB Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
DGCB Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
DGCB Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
DGCB Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

DFEV
DFEV Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
DFEV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFEV Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFEV Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
DFEV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFEV Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DGCB vs. DFEV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional Global Credit ETF (DGCB) and Dimensional Emerging Markets Value ETF (DFEV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DGCBDFEVDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.53

3.32

-1.79

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.22

4.29

-2.07

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.61

-0.33

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.97

5.06

-3.09

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.93

19.06

-12.13

DGCB vs. DFEV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DGCB Sharpe Ratio is 1.53, which is lower than the DFEV Sharpe Ratio of 3.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DGCB and DFEV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DGCBDFEVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.53

3.32

-1.79

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.47

1.11

+0.35

Drawdowns

DGCB vs. DFEV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DGCB drawdown since its inception was -3.50%, smaller than the maximum DFEV drawdown of -18.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DGCB and DFEV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DGCBDFEVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-3.50%

-18.49%

+14.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.08%

-11.35%

+8.27%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.94%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.65%

-1.36%

+0.71%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.80%

-4.65%

+3.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.87%

3.01%

-2.14%

Volatility

DGCB vs. DFEV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Dimensional Global Credit ETF (DGCB) is 1.45%, while Dimensional Emerging Markets Value ETF (DFEV) has a volatility of 7.73%. This indicates that DGCB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DFEV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DGCBDFEVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.45%

7.73%

-6.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.17%

14.85%

-11.68%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.97%

17.31%

-13.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.82%

16.42%

-11.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.82%

16.42%

-11.60%

DGCB vs. DFEV - Expense Ratio Comparison

DGCB has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than DFEV's 0.43% expense ratio.


Dividends

DGCB vs. DFEV - Dividend Comparison

DGCB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.22%, more than DFEV's 2.02% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
DFEV
Dimensional Emerging Markets Value ETF
2.02%2.69%3.17%3.47%3.35%
DGCB
Dimensional Global Credit ETF
3.22%3.43%4.72%0.63%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


DGCB and DFEV have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DFEV has higher volatility (7.73%) compared to DGCB (1.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DGCB dropped -3.50% vs DFEV's -18.49%.

On 1-year performance, DFEV leads with 57.15% vs 6.04% for DGCB. On fees, DGCB is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, DGCB has been the lower-risk option at 1.45%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, DFEV has performed better with a 57.15% return vs 6.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DGCB is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.43% for DFEV.

DGCB has the higher dividend yield at 3.22%, compared with 2.02% for DFEV.

DGCB is categorized as Global Bonds, while DFEV is Emerging Markets Diversified. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for DGCB and 0.43% for DFEV.

DFEV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.32 vs 1.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DGCB and DFEV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer