PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DGCB vs. DFCF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DGCB vs. DFCF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dimensional Global Credit ETF (DGCB) and Dimensional Core Fixed Income ETF (DFCF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DGCB achieves a 1.22% return, which is significantly higher than DFCF's 0.37% return.


DGCB

1D
-0.20%
1M
0.84%
YTD
1.22%
6M
1.01%
1Y
6.04%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

DFCF

1D
-0.19%
1M
0.32%
YTD
0.37%
6M
0.21%
1Y
5.78%
3Y*
4.79%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DGCB vs. DFCF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
DGCB
Dimensional Global Credit ETF
1.22%6.68%3.80%6.14%
DFCF
Dimensional Core Fixed Income ETF
0.37%7.89%1.86%5.48%

Correlation

The correlation between DGCB and DFCF is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 9, 2023

0.92

The correlation between DGCB and DFCF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DGCB vs. DFCF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DGCB
DGCB Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
DGCB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DGCB Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
DGCB Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
DGCB Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
DGCB Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

DFCF
DFCF Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
DFCF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFCF Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFCF Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
DFCF Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFCF Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DGCB vs. DFCF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional Global Credit ETF (DGCB) and Dimensional Core Fixed Income ETF (DFCF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DGCBDFCFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.25

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.97

2.08

-0.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.93

6.32

+0.60

DGCB vs. DFCF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DGCB Sharpe Ratio is 1.53, which is comparable to the DFCF Sharpe Ratio of 1.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DGCB and DFCF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DGCBDFCFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.53

1.46

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.47

0.04

+1.43

Drawdowns

DGCB vs. DFCF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DGCB drawdown since its inception was -3.50%, smaller than the maximum DFCF drawdown of -19.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DGCB and DFCF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DGCBDFCFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-3.50%

-19.56%

+16.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.08%

-2.79%

-0.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.65%

-1.46%

+0.81%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.80%

-8.04%

+7.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.87%

0.92%

-0.05%

Volatility

DGCB vs. DFCF - Volatility Comparison

Dimensional Global Credit ETF (DGCB) has a higher volatility of 1.45% compared to Dimensional Core Fixed Income ETF (DFCF) at 1.36%. This indicates that DGCB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DFCF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DGCBDFCFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.45%

1.36%

+0.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.17%

2.90%

+0.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.97%

3.99%

-0.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.82%

6.46%

-1.64%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.82%

6.46%

-1.64%

DGCB vs. DFCF - Expense Ratio Comparison

DGCB has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than DFCF's 0.17% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

DGCB vs. DFCF - Dividend Comparison

DGCB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.22%, less than DFCF's 4.31% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
DFCF
Dimensional Core Fixed Income ETF
4.31%4.48%4.61%4.51%3.27%0.16%
DGCB
Dimensional Global Credit ETF
3.22%3.43%4.72%0.63%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, DGCB and DFCF move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

DGCB has higher volatility (1.45%) compared to DFCF (1.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DGCB dropped -3.50% vs DFCF's -19.56%.

On 1-year performance, DGCB leads with 6.04% vs 5.78% for DFCF. On fees, DFCF is cheaper at 0.17% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, DGCB has performed better with a 6.04% return vs 5.78%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DFCF is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for DGCB.

DFCF has the higher dividend yield at 4.31%, compared with 3.22% for DGCB.

DGCB is categorized as Global Bonds, while DFCF is Intermediate Core Bond. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for DGCB and 0.17% for DFCF.

DGCB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.53 vs 1.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DGCB and DFCF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer