DFCF vs. BND
Compare and contrast key facts about Dimensional Core Fixed Income ETF (DFCF) and Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND).
DFCF and BND are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. DFCF is an actively managed fund by Dimensional. It was launched on Nov 15, 2021. BND is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the Barclays Capital U.S. Aggregate Bond Index. It was launched on Apr 3, 2007.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: DFCF or BND.
Correlation
The correlation between DFCF and BND is 0.75, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Maximize Your Portfolio’s Potential
Does your portfolio have the optimal asset allocation aligned with your goals? Find it out with our portfolio optimizer
Try portfolio optimization nowPerformance
DFCF vs. BND - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
DFCF:
0.77
BND:
0.99
DFCF:
1.11
BND:
1.43
DFCF:
1.14
BND:
1.17
DFCF:
0.35
BND:
0.39
DFCF:
2.21
BND:
2.60
DFCF:
1.83%
BND:
2.05%
DFCF:
5.26%
BND:
5.35%
DFCF:
-19.56%
BND:
-18.84%
DFCF:
-6.45%
BND:
-7.51%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DFCF achieves a 0.94% return, which is significantly lower than BND's 2.04% return.
DFCF
0.94%
-1.16%
-0.91%
4.15%
N/A
N/A
BND
2.04%
-0.57%
0.31%
4.93%
-0.96%
1.34%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
DFCF vs. BND - Expense Ratio Comparison
DFCF has a 0.17% expense ratio, which is higher than BND's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
DFCF vs. BND — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
DFCF
BND
DFCF vs. BND - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional Core Fixed Income ETF (DFCF) and Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
DFCF vs. BND - Dividend Comparison
DFCF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.66%, more than BND's 3.72% yield.
TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 |
---|
Drawdowns
DFCF vs. BND - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DFCF drawdown since its inception was -19.56%, roughly equal to the maximum BND drawdown of -18.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFCF and BND. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
DFCF vs. BND - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Dimensional Core Fixed Income ETF (DFCF) is NaN%, while Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND) has a volatility of NaN%. This indicates that DFCF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BND based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
User Portfolios with DFCF or BND
Recent discussions
Dividend Paying Stock Portfolio
4803heights
Discrepancy between SPY and ^GSPC?
Hello, from the charts, SPY seems to be outperforming its benchmark ^GSPC. That looks strange. From my understanding, SPY is designed to closely track the S&P 500.
Could there be an error in the charts?
Hedge Cat
How is Sharpe ratio calculated?
The highest sharpe ratio portfolioi in User portfolios holds only ultrashort treasuries and show a sharpe ratio of 7+. But my understanding is the Sharpe ratio is the return less the risk-free rate divided by the standard deviation of returns. But short-term treasuries ARE the risk free rate, so the Sharpe ratio should be zero since the risk free rate minus the risk free rate is zero. So are you simply ignoring the risk-free rate and dividing returns by the standard deviation???
Addendum:
Just input my portfolio and asked that your site optimize it for Sharpe ratio. I have ready cash in USFR, and ETF that holds US floating rate notes exclusively. The optimization recommended I put over 99% in USFR. However, the interest rate on floating rate notes is based on the three month treasury, so again, USFR has a Sharpe ratio of zero! Please correct this!
Bob Peticolas