DGBEX vs. DFUSX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

DGBEX (DFA Global Social Core Equity Portfolio) and DFUSX (DFA U.S. Large Company Portfolio) are both mutual funds - DGBEX is a Global Equities fund managed by Dimensional, while DFUSX is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund managed by Dimensional. Over the past 5 years, DGBEX returned 11.45%/yr vs 14.21%/yr for DFUSX. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DGBEX charges 0.34%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for DFUSX.

Performance

DGBEX vs. DFUSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DFA Global Social Core Equity Portfolio (DGBEX) and DFA U.S. Large Company Portfolio (DFUSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DGBEX achieves a 14.80% return, which is significantly higher than DFUSX's 11.70% return.

DGBEX

• 1D: 0.55%
• 1M: 6.16%
• YTD: 14.80%
• 6M: 16.17%
• 1Y: 32.78%
• 3Y*: 22.08%
• 5Y*: 11.45%
• 10Y*: —

DFUSX

• 1D: 0.14%
• 1M: 5.79%
• YTD: 11.70%
• 6M: 11.72%
• 1Y: 28.90%
• 3Y*: 22.69%
• 5Y*: 14.21%
• 10Y*: 15.52%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DGBEX vs. DFUSX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
DGBEX DFA Global Social Core Equity Portfolio	14.80%	22.39%	15.72%	22.33%	-17.76%	20.94%	12.88%	3.93%
DFUSX DFA U.S. Large Company Portfolio	11.70%	17.76%	24.91%	26.28%	-18.14%	28.53%	18.41%	5.29%

Correlation

The correlation between DGBEX and DFUSX is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.94
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.92
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.93
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 13, 2019	0.92

The correlation between DGBEX and DFUSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

DGBEX vs. DFUSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DGBEX

DGBEX Risk / Return Rank: 74
DGBEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 79
DGBEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
DGBEX Omega Ratio Rank: 70
DGBEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
DGBEX Martin Ratio Rank: 75

DFUSX

DFUSX Risk / Return Rank: 77
DFUSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
DFUSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
DFUSX Omega Ratio Rank: 70
DFUSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 75
DFUSX Martin Ratio Rank: 84

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DGBEX vs. DFUSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DFA Global Social Core Equity Portfolio (DGBEX) and DFA U.S. Large Company Portfolio (DFUSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	DGBEX	DFUSX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.61	2.60	0.00
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.63	3.60	+0.03
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.47	1.47	0.00
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.27	3.39	-0.12
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.25	15.85	-1.60
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

DGBEX vs. DFUSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DGBEX Sharpe Ratio is 2.61, which is comparable to the DFUSX Sharpe Ratio of 2.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DGBEX and DFUSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	DGBEX	DFUSX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.61	2.60	0.00
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.71	0.85	-0.14
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.86	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.71	0.46	+0.25

Drawdowns

DGBEX vs. DFUSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DGBEX drawdown since its inception was -37.83%, smaller than the maximum DFUSX drawdown of -54.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DGBEX and DFUSX.

Drawdown Indicators

	DGBEX	DFUSX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-37.83%	-54.96%	+17.13%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.32%	-8.88%	-1.44%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.44%	-18.76%	+1.32%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.97%	-24.58%	-2.39%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-33.79%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.22%	-10.60%	+4.38%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.35%	1.88%	+0.47%

Volatility

DGBEX vs. DFUSX - Volatility Comparison

DFA Global Social Core Equity Portfolio (DGBEX) has a higher volatility of 3.97% compared to DFA U.S. Large Company Portfolio (DFUSX) at 2.81%. This indicates that DGBEX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DFUSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DGBEX	DFUSX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.97%	2.81%	+1.16%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.47%	8.99%	+1.48%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.96%	11.55%	+1.41%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.34%	16.87%	-0.53%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.38%	18.07%	+1.31%

DGBEX vs. DFUSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DGBEX has a 0.34% expense ratio, which is higher than DFUSX's 0.08% expense ratio.

Dividends

DGBEX vs. DFUSX - Dividend Comparison

DGBEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.44%, more than DFUSX's 0.95% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DFUSX DFA U.S. Large Company Portfolio	0.95%	1.04%	1.24%	4.17%	6.24%	6.57%	3.82%	2.74%	2.64%	1.56%	1.95%	2.87%
DGBEX DFA Global Social Core Equity Portfolio	1.44%	1.50%	2.73%	1.85%	1.79%	2.81%	2.24%	0.51%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DGBEX and DFUSX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.94, DGBEX and DFUSX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, DGBEX or DFUSX?

DGBEX has higher volatility (3.97%) compared to DFUSX (2.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DGBEX dropped -37.83% vs DFUSX's -54.96%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DGBEX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.61 vs 2.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.