DGBEX vs. CIGEX
DGBEX (DFA Global Social Core Equity Portfolio) and CIGEX (Calamos Global Equity Fund) are both Global Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, DGBEX returned 11.45%/yr vs 12.80%/yr for CIGEX. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DGBEX charges 0.34%/yr vs 1.15%/yr for CIGEX.
Performance
DGBEX vs. CIGEX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DGBEX achieves a 14.80% return, which is significantly lower than CIGEX's 22.69% return.
DGBEX
- 1D
- 0.55%
- 1M
- 6.16%
- YTD
- 14.80%
- 6M
- 16.17%
- 1Y
- 32.78%
- 3Y*
- 22.08%
- 5Y*
- 11.45%
- 10Y*
- —
CIGEX
- 1D
- 0.41%
- 1M
- 8.94%
- YTD
- 22.69%
- 6M
- 23.38%
- 1Y
- 37.05%
- 3Y*
- 27.75%
- 5Y*
- 12.80%
- 10Y*
- 15.74%
DGBEX vs. CIGEX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DGBEX DFA Global Social Core Equity Portfolio | 14.80% | 22.39% | 15.72% | 22.33% | -17.76% | 20.94% | 12.88% | 3.93% |
CIGEX Calamos Global Equity Fund | 22.69% | 18.46% | 30.61% | 24.55% | -27.42% | 16.61% | 44.24% | 5.38% |
Correlation
The correlation between DGBEX and CIGEX is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 13, 2019 | 0.89 |
The correlation between DGBEX and CIGEX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DGBEX vs. CIGEX — Risk / Return Rank
DGBEX
CIGEX
DGBEX vs. CIGEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DFA Global Social Core Equity Portfolio (DGBEX) and Calamos Global Equity Fund (CIGEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DGBEX | CIGEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.64 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.01 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.47 | 1.35 | +0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.27 | 2.82 | +0.45 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.25 | 10.87 | +3.38 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DGBEX | CIGEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.61 | 1.97 | +0.64 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.71 | 0.66 | +0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.81 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.71 | 0.52 | +0.20 |
Drawdowns
DGBEX vs. CIGEX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DGBEX drawdown since its inception was -37.83%, smaller than the maximum CIGEX drawdown of -60.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DGBEX and CIGEX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DGBEX | CIGEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.83% | -60.48% | +22.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.32% | -13.31% | +2.99% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.44% | -20.41% | +2.97% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.97% | -35.81% | +8.84% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.81% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.22% | -10.34% | +4.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.35% | 3.44% | -1.09% |
Volatility
DGBEX vs. CIGEX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for DFA Global Social Core Equity Portfolio (DGBEX) is 3.97%, while Calamos Global Equity Fund (CIGEX) has a volatility of 6.27%. This indicates that DGBEX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CIGEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DGBEX | CIGEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.97% | 6.27% | -2.30% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.47% | 15.55% | -5.08% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.96% | 19.09% | -6.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.34% | 19.43% | -3.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.38% | 19.45% | -0.07% |
DGBEX vs. CIGEX - Expense Ratio Comparison
DGBEX has a 0.34% expense ratio, which is lower than CIGEX's 1.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
DGBEX vs. CIGEX - Dividend Comparison
DGBEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.44%, less than CIGEX's 12.53% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CIGEX Calamos Global Equity Fund | 12.53% | 15.37% | 8.67% | 0.10% | 4.43% | 11.75% | 6.51% | 7.44% | 27.66% | 9.21% | 4.62% | 1.98% |
DGBEX DFA Global Social Core Equity Portfolio | 1.44% | 1.50% | 2.73% | 1.85% | 1.79% | 2.81% | 2.24% | 0.51% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DGBEX and CIGEX have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CIGEX has higher volatility (6.27%) compared to DGBEX (3.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DGBEX dropped -37.83% vs CIGEX's -60.48%.
DGBEX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.61 vs 1.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DGBEX and CIGEX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer