PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DFVX vs. HIDV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DFVX vs. HIDV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dimensional US Large Cap Vector ETF (DFVX) and AB US High Dividend ETF (HIDV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with DFVX having a 11.47% return and HIDV slightly higher at 12.02%.


DFVX

1D
0.21%
1M
3.03%
YTD
11.47%
6M
12.46%
1Y
26.10%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

HIDV

1D
0.11%
1M
5.04%
YTD
12.02%
6M
13.18%
1Y
30.70%
3Y*
22.40%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DFVX vs. HIDV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
DFVX
Dimensional US Large Cap Vector ETF
11.47%15.35%17.72%9.85%
HIDV
AB US High Dividend ETF
12.02%14.64%26.01%10.76%

Correlation

The correlation between DFVX and HIDV is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 3, 2023

0.92

The correlation between DFVX and HIDV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DFVX vs. HIDV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DFVX
DFVX Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
DFVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFVX Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
DFVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFVX Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

HIDV
HIDV Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
HIDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HIDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
HIDV Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
HIDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
HIDV Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DFVX vs. HIDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional US Large Cap Vector ETF (DFVX) and AB US High Dividend ETF (HIDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DFVXHIDVDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.43

2.60

-0.16

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.41

3.60

-0.19

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.47

-0.04

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.70

3.20

+0.49

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

16.19

13.99

+2.20

DFVX vs. HIDV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DFVX Sharpe Ratio is 2.43, which is comparable to the HIDV Sharpe Ratio of 2.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFVX and HIDV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DFVXHIDVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.43

2.60

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.61

1.65

-0.04

Drawdowns

DFVX vs. HIDV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFVX drawdown since its inception was -16.71%, smaller than the maximum HIDV drawdown of -18.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFVX and HIDV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DFVXHIDVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.71%

-18.76%

+2.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.17%

-9.57%

+2.40%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.08%

0.00%

-0.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.79%

-2.06%

+0.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.64%

2.19%

-0.55%

Volatility

DFVX vs. HIDV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Dimensional US Large Cap Vector ETF (DFVX) is 2.49%, while AB US High Dividend ETF (HIDV) has a volatility of 2.91%. This indicates that DFVX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HIDV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DFVXHIDVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.49%

2.91%

-0.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.04%

8.98%

-0.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.77%

11.87%

-1.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.67%

14.51%

-0.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.67%

14.51%

-0.84%

DFVX vs. HIDV - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFVX has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is lower than HIDV's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

DFVX vs. HIDV - Dividend Comparison

DFVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.17%, less than HIDV's 2.24% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
DFVX
Dimensional US Large Cap Vector ETF
1.17%1.21%1.22%0.32%
HIDV
AB US High Dividend ETF
2.24%2.22%2.29%2.23%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.90, DFVX and HIDV move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

HIDV has higher volatility (2.91%) compared to DFVX (2.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFVX dropped -16.71% vs HIDV's -18.76%.

On 1-year performance, HIDV leads with 30.70% vs 26.10% for DFVX. On fees, DFVX is cheaper at 0.22% per year. On volatility, DFVX has been the lower-risk option at 2.49%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, HIDV has performed better with a 30.70% return vs 26.10%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DFVX is cheaper with a 0.22% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for HIDV.

HIDV has the higher dividend yield at 2.24%, compared with 1.17% for DFVX.

They also come from different issuers: Dimensional and AllianceBernstein. Their fees differ too: 0.22% for DFVX and 0.45% for HIDV.

HIDV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.60 vs 2.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DFVX and HIDV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer