DFVX vs. HIDV
DFVX (Dimensional US Large Cap Vector ETF) and HIDV (AB US High Dividend ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, DFVX returned 26.10% vs 30.70% for HIDV. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DFVX charges 0.22%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for HIDV.
Performance
DFVX vs. HIDV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with DFVX having a 11.47% return and HIDV slightly higher at 12.02%.
DFVX
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- 3.03%
- YTD
- 11.47%
- 6M
- 12.46%
- 1Y
- 26.10%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HIDV
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- 5.04%
- YTD
- 12.02%
- 6M
- 13.18%
- 1Y
- 30.70%
- 3Y*
- 22.40%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DFVX vs. HIDV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
DFVX Dimensional US Large Cap Vector ETF | 11.47% | 15.35% | 17.72% | 9.85% |
HIDV AB US High Dividend ETF | 12.02% | 14.64% | 26.01% | 10.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between DFVX and HIDV is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 3, 2023 | 0.92 |
The correlation between DFVX and HIDV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DFVX vs. HIDV — Risk / Return Rank
DFVX
HIDV
DFVX vs. HIDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional US Large Cap Vector ETF (DFVX) and AB US High Dividend ETF (HIDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DFVX | HIDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.43 | 2.60 | -0.16 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.41 | 3.60 | -0.19 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 1.47 | -0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.70 | 3.20 | +0.49 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.19 | 13.99 | +2.20 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DFVX | HIDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.43 | 2.60 | -0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.61 | 1.65 | -0.04 |
Drawdowns
DFVX vs. HIDV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DFVX drawdown since its inception was -16.71%, smaller than the maximum HIDV drawdown of -18.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFVX and HIDV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DFVX | HIDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.71% | -18.76% | +2.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.17% | -9.57% | +2.40% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -18.76% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.08% | 0.00% | -0.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.79% | -2.06% | +0.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.64% | 2.19% | -0.55% |
Volatility
DFVX vs. HIDV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Dimensional US Large Cap Vector ETF (DFVX) is 2.49%, while AB US High Dividend ETF (HIDV) has a volatility of 2.91%. This indicates that DFVX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HIDV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DFVX | HIDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.49% | 2.91% | -0.42% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.04% | 8.98% | -0.94% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.77% | 11.87% | -1.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.67% | 14.51% | -0.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.67% | 14.51% | -0.84% |
DFVX vs. HIDV - Expense Ratio Comparison
DFVX has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is lower than HIDV's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
DFVX vs. HIDV - Dividend Comparison
DFVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.17%, less than HIDV's 2.24% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
DFVX Dimensional US Large Cap Vector ETF | 1.17% | 1.21% | 1.22% | 0.32% |
HIDV AB US High Dividend ETF | 2.24% | 2.22% | 2.29% | 2.23% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.90, DFVX and HIDV move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
HIDV has higher volatility (2.91%) compared to DFVX (2.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFVX dropped -16.71% vs HIDV's -18.76%.
On 1-year performance, HIDV leads with 30.70% vs 26.10% for DFVX. On fees, DFVX is cheaper at 0.22% per year. On volatility, DFVX has been the lower-risk option at 2.49%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, HIDV has performed better with a 30.70% return vs 26.10%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DFVX is cheaper with a 0.22% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for HIDV.
HIDV has the higher dividend yield at 2.24%, compared with 1.17% for DFVX.
They also come from different issuers: Dimensional and AllianceBernstein. Their fees differ too: 0.22% for DFVX and 0.45% for HIDV.
HIDV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.60 vs 2.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DFVX and HIDV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer