DFVX vs. DUHP

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

DFVX (Dimensional US Large Cap Vector ETF) and DUHP (Dimensional US High Profitability ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DFVX is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Dimensional, while DUHP is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Dimensional. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, DFVX returned 23.19% vs 16.27% for DUHP. Their correlation of 0.92 means they have usually moved in the same direction. DFVX charges 0.22%/yr vs 0.21%/yr for DUHP.

Performance

DFVX vs. DUHP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dimensional US Large Cap Vector ETF (DFVX) and Dimensional US High Profitability ETF (DUHP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DFVX achieves a 13.39% return, which is significantly higher than DUHP's 8.79% return.

DFVX

• 1D: 1.45%
• 1M: 1.68%
• 6M: 8.85%
• YTD: 13.39%
• 1Y: 23.19%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 21.51%

DUHP

• 1D: -0.27%
• 1M: -1.01%
• 6M: 7.04%
• YTD: 8.79%
• 1Y: 16.27%
• 3Y*: 16.06%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 14.05%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
DFVX Dimensional US Large Cap Vector ETF	$902.16K	$893.51K	$912.47K
DUHP Dimensional US High Profitability ETF	$29.95M	$29.57M	$35.23M

DFVX vs. DUHP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
DFVX Dimensional US Large Cap Vector ETF	13.39%	15.35%	17.72%	10.84%
DUHP Dimensional US High Profitability ETF	8.79%	13.77%	19.49%	13.50%

Correlation

The correlation between DFVX and DUHP is 0.90, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.90
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 2, 2023	0.92

The correlation between DFVX and DUHP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

DFVX vs. DUHP - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	DFVX	DUHP
Technology	17.4%	37.0%
Industrials	14.5%	15.8%
Financial Services	13.7%	9.1%
Communication Services	13.1%	5.6%
Consumer Cyclical	10.9%	9.0%
Healthcare	10.9%	13.0%
Energy	7.9%	2.0%
Consumer Defensive	7.4%	7.0%
Basic Materials	3.6%	0.7%
Utilities	0.4%	1.0%
Real Estate	0.1%	-

Return for Risk

DFVX vs. DUHP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

DFVX

DFVX Risk / Return Rank: 82
DFVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
DFVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
DFVX Omega Ratio Rank: 81
DFVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
DFVX Martin Ratio Rank: 87

DUHP

DUHP Risk / Return Rank: 53
DUHP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
DUHP Sortino Ratio Rank: 53
DUHP Omega Ratio Rank: 52
DUHP Calmar Ratio Rank: 48
DUHP Martin Ratio Rank: 61

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

DFVX vs. DUHP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional US Large Cap Vector ETF (DFVX) and Dimensional US High Profitability ETF (DUHP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DFVX	DUHP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.88	1.28	+0.60
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.62	1.84	+0.78
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.34	1.23	+0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.96	1.70	+1.27
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.70	7.26	+5.44

DFVX vs. DUHP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DFVX Sharpe Ratio is 1.88, which is higher than the DUHP Sharpe Ratio of 1.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFVX and DUHP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

DFVX vs. DUHP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFVX drawdown since its inception was -16.71%, smaller than the maximum DUHP drawdown of -20.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFVX and DUHP.

Drawdown Indicators

	DFVX	DUHP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-16.71%	-20.05%	+3.34%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.17%	-8.99%	+1.82%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-17.86%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-1.67%	+1.67%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.74%	-3.93%	+2.19%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.68%	2.10%	-0.42%

Volatility

DFVX vs. DUHP - Volatility Comparison

Dimensional US Large Cap Vector ETF (DFVX) has a higher volatility of 3.07% compared to Dimensional US High Profitability ETF (DUHP) at 2.87%. This indicates that DFVX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DUHP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DFVX	DUHP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.07%	2.87%	+0.20%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.61%	9.63%	-1.02%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.31%	11.90%	-0.59%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.58%	16.19%	-2.61%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.58%	16.19%	-2.61%

DFVX vs. DUHP - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFVX has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is higher than DUHP's 0.21% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

DFVX vs. DUHP - Dividend Comparison

DFVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.14%, more than DUHP's 0.93% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
DFVX Dimensional US Large Cap Vector ETF	1.14%	1.21%	1.22%	0.32%	0.00%
DUHP Dimensional US High Profitability ETF	0.93%	1.02%	1.13%	1.51%	1.10%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DFVX and DUHP in my portfolio?

DFVX and DUHP have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DFVX or DUHP?

DFVX has higher volatility (3.07%) compared to DUHP (2.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFVX dropped -16.71% vs DUHP's -20.05%.

Which ETF is better, DFVX or DUHP?

On 1-year performance, DFVX leads with 23.19% vs 16.27% for DUHP. On fees, DUHP is cheaper at 0.21% per year. On volatility, DUHP has been the lower-risk option at 2.87%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DFVX or DUHP?

Over the 1-year period, DFVX has performed better with a 23.19% return vs 16.27%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DFVX or DUHP?

DUHP is cheaper with a 0.21% expense ratio, compared with 0.22% for DFVX.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DFVX or DUHP?

DFVX has the higher dividend yield at 1.14%, compared with 0.93% for DUHP.

What is the main difference between DFVX and DUHP?

DFVX is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while DUHP is Large Cap Blend Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.22% for DFVX and 0.21% for DUHP.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DFVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.88 vs 1.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.