PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DFVX vs. FNDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DFVX vs. FNDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dimensional US Large Cap Vector ETF (DFVX) and Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF (FNDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DFVX achieves a 11.47% return, which is significantly lower than FNDX's 14.72% return.


DFVX

1D
0.21%
1M
3.03%
YTD
11.47%
6M
12.46%
1Y
26.10%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FNDX

1D
0.52%
1M
3.39%
YTD
14.72%
6M
15.53%
1Y
33.33%
3Y*
20.96%
5Y*
12.94%
10Y*
14.28%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DFVX vs. FNDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
DFVX
Dimensional US Large Cap Vector ETF
11.47%15.35%17.72%9.85%
FNDX
Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF
14.72%16.94%16.77%11.21%

Correlation

The correlation between DFVX and FNDX is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 3, 2023

0.94

The correlation between DFVX and FNDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

DFVX vs. FNDX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DFVX
FNDX

Technology

19.8%
19.1%

Communication Services

14.3%
10.1%

Industrials

14.2%
9.3%

Financial Services

11.9%
14.1%

Consumer Cyclical

11.4%
9.2%

Healthcare

10.0%
12.0%

Energy

7.4%
10.3%

Consumer Defensive

7.1%
7.4%

Basic Materials

3.2%
3.7%

Utilities

0.4%
3.2%

Real Estate

0.1%
1.8%

Technology

DFVX
19.8%
FNDX
19.1%

Communication Services

DFVX
14.3%
FNDX
10.1%

Industrials

DFVX
14.2%
FNDX
9.3%

Financial Services

DFVX
11.9%
FNDX
14.1%

Consumer Cyclical

DFVX
11.4%
FNDX
9.2%

Healthcare

DFVX
10.0%
FNDX
12.0%

Energy

DFVX
7.4%
FNDX
10.3%

Consumer Defensive

DFVX
7.1%
FNDX
7.4%

Basic Materials

DFVX
3.2%
FNDX
3.7%

Utilities

DFVX
0.4%
FNDX
3.2%

Real Estate

DFVX
0.1%
FNDX
1.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DFVX vs. FNDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DFVX
DFVX Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
DFVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFVX Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
DFVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFVX Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

FNDX
FNDX Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
FNDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNDX Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
FNDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNDX Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DFVX vs. FNDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional US Large Cap Vector ETF (DFVX) and Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF (FNDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DFVXFNDXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.43

3.28

-0.84

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.41

4.59

-1.17

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.60

-0.16

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.70

5.55

-1.85

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

16.19

21.77

-5.58

DFVX vs. FNDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DFVX Sharpe Ratio is 2.43, which is comparable to the FNDX Sharpe Ratio of 3.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFVX and FNDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DFVXFNDXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.43

3.28

-0.84

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.61

0.79

+0.82

Drawdowns

DFVX vs. FNDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFVX drawdown since its inception was -16.71%, smaller than the maximum FNDX drawdown of -37.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFVX and FNDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DFVXFNDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.71%

-37.72%

+21.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.17%

-6.06%

-1.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.30%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.06%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.08%

0.00%

-0.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.79%

-3.55%

+1.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.64%

1.55%

+0.09%

Volatility

DFVX vs. FNDX - Volatility Comparison

Dimensional US Large Cap Vector ETF (DFVX) has a higher volatility of 2.49% compared to Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF (FNDX) at 2.37%. This indicates that DFVX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FNDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DFVXFNDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.49%

2.37%

+0.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.04%

7.27%

+0.77%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.77%

10.21%

+0.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.67%

15.18%

-1.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.67%

17.50%

-3.83%

DFVX vs. FNDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFVX has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is lower than FNDX's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

DFVX vs. FNDX - Dividend Comparison

DFVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.17%, less than FNDX's 1.45% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DFVX
Dimensional US Large Cap Vector ETF
1.17%1.21%1.22%0.32%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FNDX
Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF
1.45%1.63%1.76%1.82%2.07%1.64%2.29%2.23%2.40%1.86%2.01%2.01%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, DFVX and FNDX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

DFVX has higher volatility (2.49%) compared to FNDX (2.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFVX dropped -16.71% vs FNDX's -37.72%.

On 1-year performance, FNDX leads with 33.33% vs 26.10% for DFVX. On fees, DFVX is cheaper at 0.22% per year. On volatility, FNDX has been the lower-risk option at 2.37%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, FNDX has performed better with a 33.33% return vs 26.10%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DFVX is cheaper with a 0.22% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for FNDX.

FNDX has the higher dividend yield at 1.45%, compared with 1.17% for DFVX.

They also come from different issuers: Dimensional and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.22% for DFVX and 0.25% for FNDX.

FNDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.28 vs 2.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DFVX and FNDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer