DFVX vs. FNDX
DFVX (Dimensional US Large Cap Vector ETF) and FNDX (Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. DFVX is actively managed, while FNDX is passively managed. Over the past year, DFVX returned 26.10% vs 33.33% for FNDX. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DFVX charges 0.22%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for FNDX.
Performance
DFVX vs. FNDX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DFVX achieves a 11.47% return, which is significantly lower than FNDX's 14.72% return.
DFVX
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- 3.03%
- YTD
- 11.47%
- 6M
- 12.46%
- 1Y
- 26.10%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FNDX
- 1D
- 0.52%
- 1M
- 3.39%
- YTD
- 14.72%
- 6M
- 15.53%
- 1Y
- 33.33%
- 3Y*
- 20.96%
- 5Y*
- 12.94%
- 10Y*
- 14.28%
DFVX vs. FNDX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
DFVX Dimensional US Large Cap Vector ETF | 11.47% | 15.35% | 17.72% | 9.85% |
FNDX Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF | 14.72% | 16.94% | 16.77% | 11.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between DFVX and FNDX is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 3, 2023 | 0.94 |
The correlation between DFVX and FNDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.
DFVX vs. FNDX - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DFVX
FNDX
Technology
Communication Services
Industrials
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Utilities
Real Estate
Technology
DFVX
FNDX
Communication Services
DFVX
FNDX
Industrials
DFVX
FNDX
Financial Services
DFVX
FNDX
Consumer Cyclical
DFVX
FNDX
Healthcare
DFVX
FNDX
Energy
DFVX
FNDX
Consumer Defensive
DFVX
FNDX
Basic Materials
DFVX
FNDX
Utilities
DFVX
FNDX
Real Estate
DFVX
FNDX
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DFVX vs. FNDX — Risk / Return Rank
DFVX
FNDX
DFVX vs. FNDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional US Large Cap Vector ETF (DFVX) and Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF (FNDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DFVX | FNDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.43 | 3.28 | -0.84 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.41 | 4.59 | -1.17 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 1.60 | -0.16 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.70 | 5.55 | -1.85 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.19 | 21.77 | -5.58 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DFVX | FNDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.43 | 3.28 | -0.84 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.86 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.82 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.61 | 0.79 | +0.82 |
Drawdowns
DFVX vs. FNDX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DFVX drawdown since its inception was -16.71%, smaller than the maximum FNDX drawdown of -37.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFVX and FNDX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DFVX | FNDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.71% | -37.72% | +21.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.17% | -6.06% | -1.11% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -16.30% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -19.06% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -37.72% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.08% | 0.00% | -0.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.79% | -3.55% | +1.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.64% | 1.55% | +0.09% |
Volatility
DFVX vs. FNDX - Volatility Comparison
Dimensional US Large Cap Vector ETF (DFVX) has a higher volatility of 2.49% compared to Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF (FNDX) at 2.37%. This indicates that DFVX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FNDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DFVX | FNDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.49% | 2.37% | +0.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.04% | 7.27% | +0.77% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.77% | 10.21% | +0.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.67% | 15.18% | -1.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.67% | 17.50% | -3.83% |
DFVX vs. FNDX - Expense Ratio Comparison
DFVX has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is lower than FNDX's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
DFVX vs. FNDX - Dividend Comparison
DFVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.17%, less than FNDX's 1.45% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFVX Dimensional US Large Cap Vector ETF | 1.17% | 1.21% | 1.22% | 0.32% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FNDX Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF | 1.45% | 1.63% | 1.76% | 1.82% | 2.07% | 1.64% | 2.29% | 2.23% | 2.40% | 1.86% | 2.01% | 2.01% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.92, DFVX and FNDX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
DFVX has higher volatility (2.49%) compared to FNDX (2.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFVX dropped -16.71% vs FNDX's -37.72%.
On 1-year performance, FNDX leads with 33.33% vs 26.10% for DFVX. On fees, DFVX is cheaper at 0.22% per year. On volatility, FNDX has been the lower-risk option at 2.37%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, FNDX has performed better with a 33.33% return vs 26.10%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DFVX is cheaper with a 0.22% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for FNDX.
FNDX has the higher dividend yield at 1.45%, compared with 1.17% for DFVX.
They also come from different issuers: Dimensional and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.22% for DFVX and 0.25% for FNDX.
FNDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.28 vs 2.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DFVX and FNDX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer