DFVIX vs. FNDF

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

DFVIX (DFA International Value III Portfolio) and FNDF (Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, DFVIX returned 12.38%/yr vs 11.93%/yr for FNDF. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. DFVIX charges 0.24%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for FNDF.

Performance

DFVIX vs. FNDF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DFA International Value III Portfolio (DFVIX) and Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF (FNDF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DFVIX achieves a 13.32% return, which is significantly lower than FNDF's 21.21% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with DFVIX having a 12.38% annualized return and FNDF not far behind at 11.93%.

DFVIX

• 1D: 0.65%
• 1M: 3.66%
• YTD: 13.32%
• 6M: 17.21%
• 1Y: 37.55%
• 3Y*: 24.49%
• 5Y*: 15.29%
• 10Y*: 12.38%

FNDF

• 1D: -0.67%
• 1M: 6.97%
• YTD: 21.21%
• 6M: 24.72%
• 1Y: 44.71%
• 3Y*: 24.10%
• 5Y*: 13.35%
• 10Y*: 11.93%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DFVIX vs. FNDF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
DFVIX DFA International Value III Portfolio	13.32%	44.85%	6.86%	17.89%	-3.41%	23.59%	-1.96%	15.85%	-17.29%	26.23%
FNDF Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF	21.21%	40.99%	2.29%	20.22%	-7.78%	14.97%	3.61%	18.46%	-14.21%	23.98%

Correlation

The correlation between DFVIX and FNDF is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.92
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.94
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.96
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.96
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 16, 2013	0.96

The correlation between DFVIX and FNDF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

DFVIX vs. FNDF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DFVIX

DFVIX Risk / Return Rank: 80
DFVIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
DFVIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
DFVIX Omega Ratio Rank: 74
DFVIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
DFVIX Martin Ratio Rank: 81

FNDF

FNDF Risk / Return Rank: 84
FNDF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
FNDF Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
FNDF Omega Ratio Rank: 85
FNDF Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
FNDF Martin Ratio Rank: 80

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DFVIX vs. FNDF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DFA International Value III Portfolio (DFVIX) and Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF (FNDF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	DFVIX	FNDF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.72	2.99	-0.27
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.68	3.89	-0.21
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.49	1.53	-0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.90	4.24	-0.34
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.36	16.19	-0.83
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

DFVIX vs. FNDF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DFVIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.72, which is comparable to the FNDF Sharpe Ratio of 2.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFVIX and FNDF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	DFVIX	FNDF	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.72	2.99	-0.27
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.94	0.83	+0.11
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.69	0.68	+0.01
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.41	0.54	-0.12

Drawdowns

DFVIX vs. FNDF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFVIX drawdown since its inception was -66.53%, which is greater than FNDF's maximum drawdown of -40.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFVIX and FNDF.

Drawdown Indicators

	DFVIX	FNDF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-66.53%	-40.14%	-26.39%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.53%	-10.60%	+1.07%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.68%	-13.89%	-0.79%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.26%	-25.56%	+0.30%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-47.89%	-40.14%	-7.75%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.04%	-0.67%	+0.63%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.27%	-7.64%	-4.63%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.41%	2.77%	-0.36%

Volatility

DFVIX vs. FNDF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for DFA International Value III Portfolio (DFVIX) is 3.86%, while Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF (FNDF) has a volatility of 5.26%. This indicates that DFVIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FNDF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DFVIX	FNDF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.86%	5.26%	-1.40%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.85%	12.53%	-1.68%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.73%	15.06%	-1.33%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.46%	16.18%	+0.28%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.10%	17.67%	+0.43%

DFVIX vs. FNDF - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFVIX has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is lower than FNDF's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

DFVIX vs. FNDF - Dividend Comparison

DFVIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.87%, more than FNDF's 2.84% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DFVIX DFA International Value III Portfolio	3.87%	4.09%	4.16%	4.44%	3.82%	7.97%	2.25%	3.53%	6.16%	3.02%	3.43%	5.84%
FNDF Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF	2.84%	3.44%	4.01%	3.41%	3.10%	3.54%	2.17%	3.20%	3.47%	2.32%	2.42%	2.08%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DFVIX and FNDF in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.92, DFVIX and FNDF move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, DFVIX or FNDF?

FNDF has higher volatility (5.26%) compared to DFVIX (3.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFVIX dropped -66.53% vs FNDF's -40.14%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FNDF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.99 vs 2.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.