DFVE vs. TOLZ
DFVE (Doubleline Fortune 500 Equal Weight ETF) and TOLZ (ProShares DJ Brookfield Global Infrastructure ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DFVE is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Barclays Fortune 500 Equal Weighted Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while TOLZ is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones Brookfield Global Infrastructure Composite Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, DFVE returned 23.82% vs 13.97% for TOLZ. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DFVE charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.46%/yr for TOLZ.
Performance
DFVE vs. TOLZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DFVE achieves a 10.31% return, which is significantly lower than TOLZ's 11.31% return.
DFVE
- 1D
- -0.48%
- 1M
- 2.49%
- YTD
- 10.31%
- 6M
- 10.69%
- 1Y
- 23.82%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TOLZ
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- -1.82%
- YTD
- 11.31%
- 6M
- 11.51%
- 1Y
- 13.97%
- 3Y*
- 14.17%
- 5Y*
- 8.46%
- 10Y*
- 7.75%
DFVE vs. TOLZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
DFVE Doubleline Fortune 500 Equal Weight ETF | 10.31% | 14.51% | 13.70% |
TOLZ ProShares DJ Brookfield Global Infrastructure ETF | 11.31% | 14.76% | 13.59% |
Correlation
The correlation between DFVE and TOLZ is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2024 | 0.49 |
The correlation between DFVE and TOLZ shifts across timeframes, from 0.34 (1 year) to 0.49 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
DFVE vs. TOLZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DFVE
TOLZ
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Technology
Healthcare
-
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Real Estate
Industrials
DFVE
TOLZ
Consumer Cyclical
DFVE
TOLZ
Financial Services
DFVE
TOLZ
Technology
DFVE
TOLZ
Healthcare
DFVE
TOLZ
-
Consumer Defensive
DFVE
TOLZ
Energy
DFVE
TOLZ
Utilities
DFVE
TOLZ
Basic Materials
DFVE
TOLZ
-
Communication Services
DFVE
TOLZ
-
Real Estate
DFVE
TOLZ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DFVE vs. TOLZ — Risk / Return Rank
DFVE
TOLZ
DFVE vs. TOLZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Doubleline Fortune 500 Equal Weight ETF (DFVE) and ProShares DJ Brookfield Global Infrastructure ETF (TOLZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DFVE | TOLZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.52 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.77 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.23 | +0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.07 | 2.71 | +0.36 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.92 | 8.20 | +2.71 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DFVE | TOLZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.88 | 1.36 | +0.52 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.61 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.48 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.09 | 0.41 | +0.67 |
Drawdowns
DFVE vs. TOLZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DFVE drawdown since its inception was -19.43%, smaller than the maximum TOLZ drawdown of -39.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFVE and TOLZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DFVE | TOLZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.43% | -39.33% | +19.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.79% | -5.18% | -2.61% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -11.94% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -21.85% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -39.33% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.48% | -3.13% | +2.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.77% | -6.63% | +3.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.19% | 1.71% | +0.48% |
Volatility
DFVE vs. TOLZ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Doubleline Fortune 500 Equal Weight ETF (DFVE) is 2.98%, while ProShares DJ Brookfield Global Infrastructure ETF (TOLZ) has a volatility of 3.37%. This indicates that DFVE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TOLZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DFVE | TOLZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.98% | 3.37% | -0.39% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.09% | 8.20% | +0.89% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.73% | 10.29% | +2.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.56% | 13.99% | +1.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.56% | 16.29% | -0.73% |
DFVE vs. TOLZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
DFVE has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than TOLZ's 0.46% expense ratio.
Dividends
DFVE vs. TOLZ - Dividend Comparison
DFVE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.37%, less than TOLZ's 3.66% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFVE Doubleline Fortune 500 Equal Weight ETF | 1.37% | 1.52% | 1.53% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TOLZ ProShares DJ Brookfield Global Infrastructure ETF | 3.66% | 3.99% | 3.53% | 3.34% | 3.01% | 3.28% | 3.16% | 2.96% | 3.63% | 3.30% | 2.62% | 3.67% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DFVE and TOLZ have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TOLZ has higher volatility (3.37%) compared to DFVE (2.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFVE dropped -19.43% vs TOLZ's -39.33%.
On 1-year performance, DFVE leads with 23.82% vs 13.97% for TOLZ. On fees, DFVE is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, DFVE has been the lower-risk option at 2.98%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, DFVE has performed better with a 23.82% return vs 13.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DFVE is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.46% for TOLZ.
TOLZ has the higher dividend yield at 3.66%, compared with 1.37% for DFVE.
DFVE is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while TOLZ is Industrials Equities. DFVE tracks Barclays Fortune 500 Equal Weighted Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while TOLZ tracks Dow Jones Brookfield Global Infrastructure Composite Index. They also come from different issuers: DoubleLine and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for DFVE and 0.46% for TOLZ.
DFVE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.88 vs 1.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DFVE and TOLZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer