DFVE vs. SAMT

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

DFVE (Doubleline Fortune 500 Equal Weight ETF) and SAMT (Strategas Macro Thematic Opportunities ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. DFVE is passively managed, while SAMT is actively managed. Over the past year, DFVE returned 23.82% vs 42.07% for SAMT. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DFVE charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.66%/yr for SAMT.

Performance

DFVE vs. SAMT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Doubleline Fortune 500 Equal Weight ETF (DFVE) and Strategas Macro Thematic Opportunities ETF (SAMT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DFVE achieves a 10.31% return, which is significantly lower than SAMT's 20.25% return.

DFVE

• 1D: -0.48%
• 1M: 2.49%
• YTD: 10.31%
• 6M: 10.69%
• 1Y: 23.82%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SAMT

• 1D: -0.66%
• 1M: 6.66%
• YTD: 20.25%
• 6M: 23.92%
• 1Y: 42.07%
• 3Y*: 28.84%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DFVE vs. SAMT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
DFVE Doubleline Fortune 500 Equal Weight ETF	10.31%	14.51%	13.70%
SAMT Strategas Macro Thematic Opportunities ETF	20.25%	33.10%	23.63%

Correlation

The correlation between DFVE and SAMT is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.55
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2024	0.61

The correlation between DFVE and SAMT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.55 to 0.61 - a consistent structural relationship.

DFVE vs. SAMT - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	DFVE	SAMT
Industrials	16.9%	22.0%
Consumer Cyclical	16.1%	5.6%
Financial Services	14.5%	5.6%
Technology	12.9%	27.8%
Healthcare	9.8%	4.3%
Consumer Defensive	8.2%	12.0%
Energy	6.3%	2.9%
Utilities	5.2%	6.6%
Basic Materials	4.5%	2.7%
Communication Services	4.3%	7.8%
Real Estate	1.4%	2.9%

Return for Risk

DFVE vs. SAMT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DFVE

DFVE Risk / Return Rank: 58
DFVE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
DFVE Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
DFVE Omega Ratio Rank: 53
DFVE Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
DFVE Martin Ratio Rank: 62

SAMT

SAMT Risk / Return Rank: 77
SAMT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
SAMT Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
SAMT Omega Ratio Rank: 70
SAMT Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
SAMT Martin Ratio Rank: 75

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DFVE vs. SAMT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Doubleline Fortune 500 Equal Weight ETF (DFVE) and Strategas Macro Thematic Opportunities ETF (SAMT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	DFVE	SAMT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.88	2.53	-0.65
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.75	3.35	-0.60
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	1.42	-0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.07	5.19	-2.11
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.92	14.30	-3.39
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

DFVE vs. SAMT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DFVE Sharpe Ratio is 1.88, which is comparable to the SAMT Sharpe Ratio of 2.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFVE and SAMT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	DFVE	SAMT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.88	2.53	-0.65
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.09	0.98	+0.11

Drawdowns

DFVE vs. SAMT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFVE drawdown since its inception was -19.43%, smaller than the maximum SAMT drawdown of -20.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFVE and SAMT.

Drawdown Indicators

	DFVE	SAMT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.43%	-20.57%	+1.14%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.79%	-8.15%	+0.36%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-18.27%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.48%	-0.66%	+0.18%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.77%	-7.72%	+4.95%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.19%	2.95%	-0.76%

Volatility

DFVE vs. SAMT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Doubleline Fortune 500 Equal Weight ETF (DFVE) is 2.98%, while Strategas Macro Thematic Opportunities ETF (SAMT) has a volatility of 6.82%. This indicates that DFVE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SAMT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DFVE	SAMT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.98%	6.82%	-3.84%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.09%	12.56%	-3.47%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.73%	16.68%	-3.95%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.56%	16.94%	-1.38%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.56%	16.94%	-1.38%

DFVE vs. SAMT - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFVE has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than SAMT's 0.66% expense ratio.

Dividends

DFVE vs. SAMT - Dividend Comparison

DFVE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.37%, more than SAMT's 0.58% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
DFVE Doubleline Fortune 500 Equal Weight ETF	1.37%	1.52%	1.53%	0.00%	0.00%
SAMT Strategas Macro Thematic Opportunities ETF	0.58%	0.70%	1.40%	1.49%	0.73%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DFVE and SAMT in my portfolio?

DFVE and SAMT have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DFVE or SAMT?

SAMT has higher volatility (6.82%) compared to DFVE (2.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFVE dropped -19.43% vs SAMT's -20.57%.

Which ETF is better, DFVE or SAMT?

On 1-year performance, SAMT leads with 42.07% vs 23.82% for DFVE. On fees, DFVE is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, DFVE has been the lower-risk option at 2.98%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DFVE or SAMT?

Over the 1-year period, SAMT has performed better with a 42.07% return vs 23.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DFVE or SAMT?

DFVE is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.66% for SAMT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DFVE or SAMT?

DFVE has the higher dividend yield at 1.37%, compared with 0.58% for SAMT.

What is the main difference between DFVE and SAMT?

They also come from different issuers: DoubleLine and Strategas. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for DFVE and 0.66% for SAMT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SAMT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.53 vs 1.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.