PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DFUVX vs. SPTM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DFUVX vs. SPTM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DFA U.S. Large Cap Value III Portfolio (DFUVX) and SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF (SPTM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DFUVX achieves a 15.80% return, which is significantly higher than SPTM's 11.57% return. Over the past 10 years, DFUVX has underperformed SPTM with an annualized return of 11.29%, while SPTM has yielded a comparatively higher 15.23% annualized return.


DFUVX

1D
-0.22%
1M
4.48%
YTD
15.80%
6M
17.29%
1Y
34.22%
3Y*
19.19%
5Y*
9.52%
10Y*
11.29%

SPTM

1D
0.43%
1M
4.45%
YTD
11.57%
6M
11.50%
1Y
28.51%
3Y*
22.16%
5Y*
13.47%
10Y*
15.23%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DFUVX vs. SPTM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DFUVX
DFA U.S. Large Cap Value III Portfolio
15.80%15.83%12.87%11.65%-5.73%22.75%-0.45%25.62%-11.58%18.60%
SPTM
SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF
11.57%16.93%23.87%25.55%-17.75%28.58%17.94%31.34%-5.30%21.18%

Correlation

The correlation between DFUVX and SPTM is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.74

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 11, 2000

0.87

The correlation between DFUVX and SPTM shifts across timeframes, from 0.71 (1 year) to 0.87 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DFUVX vs. SPTM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DFUVX
DFUVX Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
DFUVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFUVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFUVX Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
DFUVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFUVX Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

SPTM
SPTM Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
SPTM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPTM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPTM Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
SPTM Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPTM Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DFUVX vs. SPTM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DFA U.S. Large Cap Value III Portfolio (DFUVX) and SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF (SPTM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DFUVXSPTMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.67

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.54

1.44

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.82

3.30

+2.53

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

21.34

15.38

+5.96

DFUVX vs. SPTM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DFUVX Sharpe Ratio is 3.08, which is comparable to the SPTM Sharpe Ratio of 2.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFUVX and SPTM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DFUVXSPTMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.08

2.41

+0.67

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

0.80

-0.20

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.62

0.85

-0.23

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.45

0.46

-0.01

Drawdowns

DFUVX vs. SPTM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFUVX drawdown since its inception was -65.60%, which is greater than SPTM's maximum drawdown of -54.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFUVX and SPTM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DFUVXSPTMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-65.60%

-54.80%

-10.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.85%

-8.68%

+2.83%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.04%

-18.87%

+1.83%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.33%

-24.14%

+3.81%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.76%

-34.66%

-7.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.22%

-0.25%

+0.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.84%

-9.05%

-0.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.59%

1.86%

-0.27%

Volatility

DFUVX vs. SPTM - Volatility Comparison

DFA U.S. Large Cap Value III Portfolio (DFUVX) and SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF (SPTM) have volatilities of 2.78% and 2.82%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DFUVXSPTMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.78%

2.82%

-0.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.20%

8.93%

-0.73%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.06%

11.87%

-0.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.93%

16.86%

-0.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.40%

18.03%

+0.37%

DFUVX vs. SPTM - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFUVX has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is higher than SPTM's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

DFUVX vs. SPTM - Dividend Comparison

DFUVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.51%, more than SPTM's 1.03% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DFUVX
DFA U.S. Large Cap Value III Portfolio
1.51%1.31%1.94%5.68%5.84%1.77%2.09%5.04%9.79%7.99%4.90%8.03%
SPTM
SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF
1.03%1.13%1.28%1.44%1.69%1.25%1.56%1.72%1.90%1.66%1.91%1.92%

Frequently Asked Questions


DFUVX and SPTM have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SPTM has higher volatility (2.82%) compared to DFUVX (2.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFUVX dropped -65.60% vs SPTM's -54.80%.

DFUVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.08 vs 2.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DFUVX and SPTM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer