PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DFUV vs. SCHV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DFUV vs. SCHV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dimensional US Marketwide Value ETF (DFUV) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF (SCHV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DFUV achieves a 16.95% return, which is significantly higher than SCHV's 15.39% return.


DFUV

1D
-0.11%
1M
5.54%
YTD
16.95%
6M
18.53%
1Y
34.65%
3Y*
19.61%
5Y*
10Y*

SCHV

1D
0.09%
1M
5.65%
YTD
15.39%
6M
16.00%
1Y
28.49%
3Y*
18.86%
5Y*
10.40%
10Y*
11.50%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DFUV vs. SCHV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
DFUV
Dimensional US Marketwide Value ETF
16.95%15.77%11.79%13.25%1.22%
SCHV
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF
15.39%16.02%14.13%8.93%1.57%

Correlation

The correlation between DFUV and SCHV is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 10, 2022

0.96

The correlation between DFUV and SCHV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

DFUV vs. SCHV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DFUV
SCHV

Financial Services

21.9%
19.6%

Technology

15.7%
18.2%

Healthcare

13.7%
11.3%

Industrials

13.6%
14.0%

Energy

12.9%
7.2%

Consumer Cyclical

7.2%
6.9%

Basic Materials

6.0%
2.8%

Communication Services

5.1%
2.5%

Consumer Defensive

3.4%
8.8%

Real Estate

0.4%
4.1%

Utilities

0.1%
4.6%

Financial Services

DFUV
21.9%
SCHV
19.6%

Technology

DFUV
15.7%
SCHV
18.2%

Healthcare

DFUV
13.7%
SCHV
11.3%

Industrials

DFUV
13.6%
SCHV
14.0%

Energy

DFUV
12.9%
SCHV
7.2%

Consumer Cyclical

DFUV
7.2%
SCHV
6.9%

Basic Materials

DFUV
6.0%
SCHV
2.8%

Communication Services

DFUV
5.1%
SCHV
2.5%

Consumer Defensive

DFUV
3.4%
SCHV
8.8%

Real Estate

DFUV
0.4%
SCHV
4.1%

Utilities

DFUV
0.1%
SCHV
4.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DFUV vs. SCHV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DFUV
DFUV Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
DFUV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFUV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFUV Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
DFUV Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFUV Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHV
SCHV Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
SCHV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHV Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHV Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DFUV vs. SCHV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional US Marketwide Value ETF (DFUV) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF (SCHV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DFUVSCHVDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.96

2.69

+0.26

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.12

3.84

+0.29

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.52

1.48

+0.04

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

5.80

4.19

+1.61

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

21.03

16.96

+4.07

DFUV vs. SCHV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DFUV Sharpe Ratio is 2.96, which is comparable to the SCHV Sharpe Ratio of 2.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFUV and SCHV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DFUVSCHVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.96

2.69

+0.26

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.90

0.72

+0.18

Drawdowns

DFUV vs. SCHV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFUV drawdown since its inception was -17.60%, smaller than the maximum SCHV drawdown of -37.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFUV and SCHV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DFUVSCHVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.60%

-37.08%

+19.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.01%

-6.83%

+0.82%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.60%

-15.26%

-2.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.78%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.11%

0.00%

-0.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.65%

-3.83%

+0.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.65%

1.69%

-0.04%

Volatility

DFUV vs. SCHV - Volatility Comparison

Dimensional US Marketwide Value ETF (DFUV) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF (SCHV) have volatilities of 3.11% and 3.09%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DFUVSCHVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.11%

3.09%

+0.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.47%

8.13%

+0.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.80%

10.63%

+1.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.24%

14.51%

+1.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.24%

16.94%

-0.70%

DFUV vs. SCHV - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFUV has a 0.21% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHV's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

DFUV vs. SCHV - Dividend Comparison

DFUV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.35%, less than SCHV's 1.76% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DFUV
Dimensional US Marketwide Value ETF
1.35%1.55%1.64%1.72%1.34%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SCHV
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF
1.76%2.02%2.25%2.42%2.37%1.93%3.03%3.02%3.05%2.37%2.65%2.69%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, DFUV and SCHV move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

DFUV has higher volatility (3.11%) compared to SCHV (3.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFUV dropped -17.60% vs SCHV's -37.08%.

On 3-year performance, DFUV leads with 19.61% vs 18.86% for SCHV. On fees, SCHV is cheaper at 0.04% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, DFUV has performed better with a 19.61% return vs 18.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHV is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.21% for DFUV.

SCHV has the higher dividend yield at 1.76%, compared with 1.35% for DFUV.

They also come from different issuers: Dimensional and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.21% for DFUV and 0.04% for SCHV.

DFUV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.96 vs 2.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DFUV and SCHV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer