DFUV vs. SCHV
DFUV (Dimensional US Marketwide Value ETF) and SCHV (Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. DFUV is actively managed, while SCHV is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, DFUV returned 19.61%/yr vs 18.86%/yr for SCHV. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. DFUV charges 0.21%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for SCHV.
Performance
DFUV vs. SCHV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DFUV achieves a 16.95% return, which is significantly higher than SCHV's 15.39% return.
DFUV
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- 5.54%
- YTD
- 16.95%
- 6M
- 18.53%
- 1Y
- 34.65%
- 3Y*
- 19.61%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SCHV
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- 5.65%
- YTD
- 15.39%
- 6M
- 16.00%
- 1Y
- 28.49%
- 3Y*
- 18.86%
- 5Y*
- 10.40%
- 10Y*
- 11.50%
DFUV vs. SCHV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFUV Dimensional US Marketwide Value ETF | 16.95% | 15.77% | 11.79% | 13.25% | 1.22% |
SCHV Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF | 15.39% | 16.02% | 14.13% | 8.93% | 1.57% |
Correlation
The correlation between DFUV and SCHV is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 10, 2022 | 0.96 |
The correlation between DFUV and SCHV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.
DFUV vs. SCHV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DFUV
SCHV
Financial Services
Technology
Healthcare
Industrials
Energy
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Utilities
Financial Services
DFUV
SCHV
Technology
DFUV
SCHV
Healthcare
DFUV
SCHV
Industrials
DFUV
SCHV
Energy
DFUV
SCHV
Consumer Cyclical
DFUV
SCHV
Basic Materials
DFUV
SCHV
Communication Services
DFUV
SCHV
Consumer Defensive
DFUV
SCHV
Real Estate
DFUV
SCHV
Utilities
DFUV
SCHV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DFUV vs. SCHV — Risk / Return Rank
DFUV
SCHV
DFUV vs. SCHV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional US Marketwide Value ETF (DFUV) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF (SCHV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DFUV | SCHV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.96 | 2.69 | +0.26 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 4.12 | 3.84 | +0.29 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.52 | 1.48 | +0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.80 | 4.19 | +1.61 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 21.03 | 16.96 | +4.07 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DFUV | SCHV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.96 | 2.69 | +0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.72 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.68 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.90 | 0.72 | +0.18 |
Drawdowns
DFUV vs. SCHV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DFUV drawdown since its inception was -17.60%, smaller than the maximum SCHV drawdown of -37.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFUV and SCHV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DFUV | SCHV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.60% | -37.08% | +19.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.01% | -6.83% | +0.82% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.60% | -15.26% | -2.34% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -19.78% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -37.08% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.11% | 0.00% | -0.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.65% | -3.83% | +0.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.65% | 1.69% | -0.04% |
Volatility
DFUV vs. SCHV - Volatility Comparison
Dimensional US Marketwide Value ETF (DFUV) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF (SCHV) have volatilities of 3.11% and 3.09%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DFUV | SCHV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.11% | 3.09% | +0.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.47% | 8.13% | +0.34% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.80% | 10.63% | +1.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.24% | 14.51% | +1.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.24% | 16.94% | -0.70% |
DFUV vs. SCHV - Expense Ratio Comparison
DFUV has a 0.21% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHV's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
DFUV vs. SCHV - Dividend Comparison
DFUV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.35%, less than SCHV's 1.76% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFUV Dimensional US Marketwide Value ETF | 1.35% | 1.55% | 1.64% | 1.72% | 1.34% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCHV Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF | 1.76% | 2.02% | 2.25% | 2.42% | 2.37% | 1.93% | 3.03% | 3.02% | 3.05% | 2.37% | 2.65% | 2.69% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.96, DFUV and SCHV move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
DFUV has higher volatility (3.11%) compared to SCHV (3.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFUV dropped -17.60% vs SCHV's -37.08%.
On 3-year performance, DFUV leads with 19.61% vs 18.86% for SCHV. On fees, SCHV is cheaper at 0.04% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, DFUV has performed better with a 19.61% return vs 18.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHV is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.21% for DFUV.
SCHV has the higher dividend yield at 1.76%, compared with 1.35% for DFUV.
They also come from different issuers: Dimensional and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.21% for DFUV and 0.04% for SCHV.
DFUV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.96 vs 2.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DFUV and SCHV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer