DFUV vs. DFAU
DFUV (Dimensional US Marketwide Value ETF) and DFAU (Dimensional US Core Equity Market ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DFUV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Dimensional, while DFAU is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Dimensional. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, DFUV returned 19.61%/yr vs 21.70%/yr for DFAU. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DFUV charges 0.21%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for DFAU.
Performance
DFUV vs. DFAU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DFUV achieves a 16.95% return, which is significantly higher than DFAU's 11.32% return.
DFUV
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- 5.54%
- YTD
- 16.95%
- 6M
- 18.53%
- 1Y
- 34.65%
- 3Y*
- 19.61%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DFAU
- 1D
- -0.67%
- 1M
- 4.93%
- YTD
- 11.32%
- 6M
- 11.27%
- 1Y
- 28.49%
- 3Y*
- 21.70%
- 5Y*
- 13.05%
- 10Y*
- —
DFUV vs. DFAU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFUV Dimensional US Marketwide Value ETF | 16.95% | 15.77% | 11.79% | 13.25% | 1.22% |
DFAU Dimensional US Core Equity Market ETF | 11.32% | 16.78% | 23.17% | 24.79% | -2.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between DFUV and DFAU is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 10, 2022 | 0.85 |
The correlation between DFUV and DFAU has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.
DFUV vs. DFAU - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DFUV
DFAU
Financial Services
Technology
Healthcare
Industrials
Energy
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Utilities
Financial Services
DFUV
DFAU
Technology
DFUV
DFAU
Healthcare
DFUV
DFAU
Industrials
DFUV
DFAU
Energy
DFUV
DFAU
Consumer Cyclical
DFUV
DFAU
Basic Materials
DFUV
DFAU
Communication Services
DFUV
DFAU
Consumer Defensive
DFUV
DFAU
Real Estate
DFUV
DFAU
Utilities
DFUV
DFAU
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DFUV vs. DFAU — Risk / Return Rank
DFUV
DFAU
DFUV vs. DFAU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional US Marketwide Value ETF (DFUV) and Dimensional US Core Equity Market ETF (DFAU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DFUV | DFAU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.58 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.88 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.52 | 1.43 | +0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.80 | 3.30 | +2.50 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 21.03 | 15.10 | +5.93 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DFUV | DFAU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.96 | 2.38 | +0.58 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.77 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.90 | 0.94 | -0.04 |
Drawdowns
DFUV vs. DFAU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DFUV drawdown since its inception was -17.60%, smaller than the maximum DFAU drawdown of -23.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFUV and DFAU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DFUV | DFAU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.60% | -23.61% | +6.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.01% | -8.67% | +2.66% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.60% | -19.36% | +1.76% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -23.61% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.11% | -0.67% | +0.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.65% | -4.99% | +1.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.65% | 1.89% | -0.24% |
Volatility
DFUV vs. DFAU - Volatility Comparison
Dimensional US Marketwide Value ETF (DFUV) has a higher volatility of 3.11% compared to Dimensional US Core Equity Market ETF (DFAU) at 2.95%. This indicates that DFUV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DFAU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DFUV | DFAU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.11% | 2.95% | +0.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.47% | 9.04% | -0.57% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.80% | 12.06% | -0.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.24% | 17.02% | -0.78% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.24% | 16.73% | -0.49% |
DFUV vs. DFAU - Expense Ratio Comparison
DFUV has a 0.21% expense ratio, which is higher than DFAU's 0.12% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
DFUV vs. DFAU - Dividend Comparison
DFUV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.35%, more than DFAU's 0.90% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFAU Dimensional US Core Equity Market ETF | 0.90% | 0.95% | 1.10% | 1.29% | 1.40% | 1.00% | 0.13% |
DFUV Dimensional US Marketwide Value ETF | 1.35% | 1.55% | 1.64% | 1.72% | 1.34% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DFUV and DFAU have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DFUV has higher volatility (3.11%) compared to DFAU (2.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFUV dropped -17.60% vs DFAU's -23.61%.
On 3-year performance, DFAU leads with 21.70% vs 19.61% for DFUV. On fees, DFAU is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, DFAU has been the lower-risk option at 2.95%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, DFAU has performed better with a 21.70% return vs 19.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DFAU is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.21% for DFUV.
DFUV has the higher dividend yield at 1.35%, compared with 0.90% for DFAU.
DFUV is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while DFAU is Large Cap Blend Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.21% for DFUV and 0.12% for DFAU.
DFUV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.96 vs 2.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DFUV and DFAU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer