DFUSX vs. ZVNBX

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

DFUSX (DFA U.S. Large Company Portfolio) and ZVNBX (Zevenbergen Growth Fund) are both mutual funds - DFUSX is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 Index, while ZVNBX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Zevenbergen. Their 0.75 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. DFUSX charges 0.08%/yr vs 1.30%/yr for ZVNBX.

Performance

DFUSX vs. ZVNBX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DFA U.S. Large Company Portfolio (DFUSX) and Zevenbergen Growth Fund (ZVNBX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

DFUSX

• 1D: 1.67%
• 1M: -0.56%
• 6M: 7.80%
• YTD: 9.37%
• 1Y: 20.58%
• 3Y*: 18.99%
• 5Y*: 12.63%
• 10Y*: 14.86%
• ALL TIME*: 8.65%

ZVNBX

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
DFUSX DFA U.S. Large Company Portfolio	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

DFUSX vs. ZVNBX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
DFUSX DFA U.S. Large Company Portfolio	9.37%	17.76%	24.91%	26.28%	-18.14%	28.53%	18.41%	32.08%	-4.45%	21.04%
ZVNBX Zevenbergen Growth Fund	-0.07%	9.93%	34.10%	63.92%	-54.79%	-9.19%	123.87%	37.73%	5.88%	33.71%

Correlation

The correlation between DFUSX and ZVNBX is 0.72, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.72
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.80
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.80
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.74
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 2, 2015	0.75

The correlation between DFUSX and ZVNBX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

DFUSX vs. ZVNBX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

DFUSX

DFUSX Risk / Return Rank: 65
DFUSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
DFUSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
DFUSX Omega Ratio Rank: 60
DFUSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
DFUSX Martin Ratio Rank: 76

ZVNBX

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

DFUSX vs. ZVNBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DFA U.S. Large Company Portfolio (DFUSX) and Zevenbergen Growth Fund (ZVNBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DFUSX	ZVNBX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.47	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.08	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.08	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.94	—	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	DFUSX	ZVNBX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-54.96%	—	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.88%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.76%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.58%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-33.79%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.09%	—	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.55%	—	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.06%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	DFUSX	ZVNBX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.45%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.12%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.60%	—	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.99%	—	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.07%	—	—

DFUSX vs. ZVNBX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFUSX has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than ZVNBX's 1.30% expense ratio.

Dividends

DFUSX vs. ZVNBX - Dividend Comparison

DFUSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.99%, less than ZVNBX's 1.27% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DFUSX DFA U.S. Large Company Portfolio	0.99%	1.04%	1.24%	4.17%	6.24%	6.57%	3.82%	2.74%	2.64%	1.56%	1.95%	2.87%
ZVNBX Zevenbergen Growth Fund	1.27%	1.26%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	1.95%	0.07%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DFUSX and ZVNBX in my portfolio?

DFUSX and ZVNBX have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.