DFUS vs. SCHK
DFUS (Dimensional U.S. Equity Market ETF) and SCHK (Schwab 1000 Index ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. DFUS is actively managed, while SCHK is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, DFUS returned 12.74%/yr vs 12.31%/yr for SCHK. With a 1.00 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. DFUS charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for SCHK.
Performance
DFUS vs. SCHK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with DFUS having a 8.60% return and SCHK slightly lower at 8.54%.
DFUS
- 1D
- -1.68%
- 1M
- -0.94%
- YTD
- 8.60%
- 6M
- 7.51%
- 1Y
- 24.34%
- 3Y*
- 20.81%
- 5Y*
- 12.74%
- 10Y*
- —
SCHK
- 1D
- -1.42%
- 1M
- -0.95%
- YTD
- 8.54%
- 6M
- 7.46%
- 1Y
- 23.67%
- 3Y*
- 20.74%
- 5Y*
- 12.31%
- 10Y*
- —
DFUS vs. SCHK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFUS Dimensional U.S. Equity Market ETF | 8.60% | 17.46% | 24.34% | 26.36% | -18.34% | 12.07% |
SCHK Schwab 1000 Index ETF | 8.54% | 17.23% | 24.48% | 26.63% | -19.51% | 11.44% |
Correlation
The correlation between DFUS and SCHK is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.00 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 1.00 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.00 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 14, 2021 | 1.00 |
The correlation between DFUS and SCHK has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 1.00 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.
DFUS vs. SCHK - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DFUS
SCHK
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Technology
DFUS
SCHK
Financial Services
DFUS
SCHK
Consumer Cyclical
DFUS
SCHK
Communication Services
DFUS
SCHK
Industrials
DFUS
SCHK
Healthcare
DFUS
SCHK
Consumer Defensive
DFUS
SCHK
Energy
DFUS
SCHK
Utilities
DFUS
SCHK
Basic Materials
DFUS
SCHK
Real Estate
DFUS
SCHK
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DFUS vs. SCHK — Risk / Return Rank
DFUS
SCHK
DFUS vs. SCHK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional U.S. Equity Market ETF (DFUS) and Schwab 1000 Index ETF (SCHK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DFUS | SCHK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.03 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.33 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.73 | 2.65 | +0.08 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.07 | 11.81 | +0.26 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DFUS vs. SCHK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DFUS drawdown since its inception was -24.62%, smaller than the maximum SCHK drawdown of -34.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFUS and SCHK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DFUS | SCHK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.62% | -34.80% | +10.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.96% | -8.97% | +0.01% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.44% | -19.21% | -0.23% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.62% | -25.44% | +0.82% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.03% | -2.98% | -0.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.78% | -5.16% | -0.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.02% | 2.01% | +0.01% |
Volatility
DFUS vs. SCHK - Volatility Comparison
Dimensional U.S. Equity Market ETF (DFUS) and Schwab 1000 Index ETF (SCHK) have volatilities of 5.17% and 4.96%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DFUS | SCHK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.17% | 4.96% | +0.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.20% | 10.10% | +0.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.97% | 12.84% | +0.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.29% | 17.34% | -0.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.26% | 19.12% | -1.86% |
DFUS vs. SCHK - Expense Ratio Comparison
DFUS has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHK's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
DFUS vs. SCHK - Dividend Comparison
DFUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.85%, less than SCHK's 1.03% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFUS Dimensional U.S. Equity Market ETF | 0.85% | 0.88% | 1.04% | 1.33% | 1.48% | 0.85% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCHK Schwab 1000 Index ETF | 1.03% | 1.09% | 1.20% | 1.38% | 1.57% | 1.17% | 1.58% | 1.82% | 1.80% | 0.31% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 1.00, DFUS and SCHK move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
DFUS has higher volatility (5.17%) compared to SCHK (4.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFUS dropped -24.62% vs SCHK's -34.80%.
On 5-year performance, DFUS leads with 12.74% vs 12.31% for SCHK. On fees, SCHK is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, SCHK has been the lower-risk option at 4.96%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, DFUS has performed better with a 12.74% return vs 12.31%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHK is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.09% for DFUS.
SCHK has the higher dividend yield at 1.03%, compared with 0.85% for DFUS.
They also come from different issuers: Dimensional and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for DFUS and 0.03% for SCHK.
DFUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.89 vs 1.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DFUS and SCHK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer