DFTT vs. BDGS

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

DFTT (DF Tactical 30 ETF) and BDGS (Bridges Capital Tactical ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. DFTT is passively managed, while BDGS is actively managed. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DFTT charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.87%/yr for BDGS.

Performance

DFTT vs. BDGS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DF Tactical 30 ETF (DFTT) and Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DFTT achieves a 22.90% return, which is significantly higher than BDGS's 3.92% return.

DFTT

• 1D: -0.93%
• 1M: 2.95%
• YTD: 22.90%
• 6M: 20.64%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BDGS

• 1D: -0.28%
• 1M: -1.40%
• YTD: 3.92%
• 6M: 3.55%
• 1Y: 10.74%
• 3Y*: 13.32%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DFTT vs. BDGS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
DFTT DF Tactical 30 ETF	22.90%	-0.00%
BDGS Bridges Capital Tactical ETF	3.92%	-0.02%

Correlation

The correlation between DFTT and BDGS is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 12, 2025	0.66

DFTT vs. BDGS - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	DFTT	BDGS
Technology	51.0%	37.4%
Communication Services	17.2%	16.6%
Financial Services	16.1%	9.3%
Industrials	11.3%	6.6%
Healthcare	2.2%	7.5%
Utilities	1.9%	1.9%
Basic Materials	-	1.5%
Consumer Cyclical	-	10.9%
Consumer Defensive	-	4.1%
Energy	-	2.6%
Real Estate	-	1.5%

Return for Risk

DFTT vs. BDGS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DFTT

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

BDGS

BDGS Risk / Return Rank: 62
BDGS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
BDGS Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
BDGS Omega Ratio Rank: 63
BDGS Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
BDGS Martin Ratio Rank: 70

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DFTT vs. BDGS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DF Tactical 30 ETF (DFTT) and Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DFTT	BDGS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.70	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.55	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.34	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	2.68	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	11.59	—

Drawdowns

DFTT vs. BDGS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFTT drawdown since its inception was -10.46%, which is greater than BDGS's maximum drawdown of -9.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFTT and BDGS.

Drawdown Indicators

	DFTT	BDGS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-10.46%	-9.12%	-1.34%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-4.03%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-9.12%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.16%	-2.44%	-2.72%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.18%	-0.66%	-1.52%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	0.93%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	DFTT	BDGS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	2.30%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	5.18%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23.84%	6.35%	+17.49%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.84%	8.22%	+15.62%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.84%	8.22%	+15.62%

DFTT vs. BDGS - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFTT has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is lower than BDGS's 0.87% expense ratio.

Dividends

DFTT vs. BDGS - Dividend Comparison

DFTT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BDGS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.53%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
BDGS Bridges Capital Tactical ETF	0.53%	0.55%	1.81%	0.84%
DFTT DF Tactical 30 ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DFTT and BDGS in my portfolio?

DFTT and BDGS have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, DFTT or BDGS?

On fees, DFTT is cheaper at 0.70% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, DFTT or BDGS?

DFTT is cheaper with a 0.70% expense ratio, compared with 0.87% for BDGS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DFTT or BDGS?

BDGS has the higher dividend yield at 0.53%, compared with 0.00% for DFTT.

What is the main difference between DFTT and BDGS?

They also come from different issuers: Donoghue Forlines and Bridges. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for DFTT and 0.87% for BDGS.