DFTT vs. BBUS
DFTT (DF Tactical 30 ETF) and BBUS (JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Equity ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds - DFTT tracks the DF Risk-Managed Tactical Top 30 Index while BBUS tracks the Morningstar US Target Market Exposure Index. Both are passively managed. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DFTT charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.02%/yr for BBUS.
Performance
DFTT vs. BBUS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DFTT achieves a 22.90% return, which is significantly higher than BBUS's 7.68% return.
DFTT
- 1D
- -0.93%
- 1M
- 2.95%
- YTD
- 22.90%
- 6M
- 20.64%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BBUS
- 1D
- -0.15%
- 1M
- -1.43%
- YTD
- 7.68%
- 6M
- 6.38%
- 1Y
- 21.54%
- 3Y*
- 20.74%
- 5Y*
- 12.46%
- 10Y*
- —
DFTT vs. BBUS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
DFTT DF Tactical 30 ETF | 22.90% | -0.00% |
BBUS JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Equity ETF | 7.68% | 0.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between DFTT and BBUS is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 12, 2025 | 0.83 |
DFTT vs. BBUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DFTT
BBUS
Technology
Communication Services
Financial Services
Industrials
Healthcare
Utilities
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
DFTT
BBUS
Communication Services
DFTT
BBUS
Financial Services
DFTT
BBUS
Industrials
DFTT
BBUS
Healthcare
DFTT
BBUS
Utilities
DFTT
BBUS
Basic Materials
DFTT
-
BBUS
Consumer Cyclical
DFTT
-
BBUS
Consumer Defensive
DFTT
-
BBUS
Energy
DFTT
-
BBUS
Real Estate
DFTT
-
BBUS
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DFTT vs. BBUS — Risk / Return Rank
DFTT
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
BBUS
DFTT vs. BBUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DF Tactical 30 ETF (DFTT) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DFTT | BBUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.31 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.35 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 10.33 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DFTT vs. BBUS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DFTT drawdown since its inception was -10.46%, smaller than the maximum BBUS drawdown of -35.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFTT and BBUS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DFTT | BBUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.46% | -35.35% | +24.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -9.21% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -19.01% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -25.46% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.16% | -3.37% | -1.79% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.18% | -5.43% | +3.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.09% | — |
Volatility
DFTT vs. BBUS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DFTT | BBUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.89% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 9.87% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.84% | 12.53% | +11.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.84% | 17.13% | +6.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.84% | 19.59% | +4.25% |
DFTT vs. BBUS - Expense Ratio Comparison
DFTT has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than BBUS's 0.02% expense ratio.
Dividends
DFTT vs. BBUS - Dividend Comparison
DFTT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BBUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BBUS JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Equity ETF | 1.03% | 1.07% | 1.21% | 1.38% | 1.57% | 1.11% | 1.43% | 1.37% |
DFTT DF Tactical 30 ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DFTT and BBUS have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BBUS is cheaper at 0.02% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BBUS is cheaper with a 0.02% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for DFTT.
BBUS has the higher dividend yield at 1.03%, compared with 0.00% for DFTT.
DFTT tracks DF Risk-Managed Tactical Top 30 Index, while BBUS tracks Morningstar US Target Market Exposure Index. They also come from different issuers: Donoghue Forlines and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for DFTT and 0.02% for BBUS.
Find the right allocation for DFTT and BBUS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer