DFSU vs. USL
DFSU (Dimensional US Sustainability Core 1 ETF) and USL (United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP) are both exchange-traded funds - DFSU is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Dimensional, while USL is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the 12 Month Light Sweet Crude Oil. DFSU is actively managed, while USL is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, DFSU returned 20.21%/yr vs 18.42%/yr for USL. At a 0.04 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DFSU charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.88%/yr for USL.
Performance
DFSU vs. USL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DFSU achieves a 7.31% return, which is significantly lower than USL's 63.07% return.
DFSU
- 1D
- -0.69%
- 1M
- 3.98%
- YTD
- 7.31%
- 6M
- 7.39%
- 1Y
- 23.54%
- 3Y*
- 20.21%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
USL
- 1D
- 1.55%
- 1M
- -1.61%
- YTD
- 63.07%
- 6M
- 59.66%
- 1Y
- 57.86%
- 3Y*
- 18.42%
- 5Y*
- 17.41%
- 10Y*
- 10.91%
DFSU vs. USL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFSU Dimensional US Sustainability Core 1 ETF | 7.31% | 15.65% | 22.96% | 26.27% | 0.65% |
USL United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP | 63.07% | -12.37% | 8.30% | -1.11% | -3.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between DFSU and USL is -0.32, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.32 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.05 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 3, 2022 | 0.04 |
The correlation between DFSU and USL shifts across timeframes, from -0.32 (1 year) to 0.04 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
DFSU vs. USL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DFSU
USL
Technology
-
Financial Services
Industrials
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Communication Services
-
Healthcare
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Basic Materials
-
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
DFSU
USL
-
Financial Services
DFSU
USL
Industrials
DFSU
USL
-
Consumer Cyclical
DFSU
USL
-
Communication Services
DFSU
USL
-
Healthcare
DFSU
USL
-
Consumer Defensive
DFSU
USL
-
Basic Materials
DFSU
USL
-
Energy
DFSU
USL
-
Utilities
DFSU
USL
-
Real Estate
DFSU
USL
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DFSU vs. USL — Risk / Return Rank
DFSU
USL
DFSU vs. USL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional US Sustainability Core 1 ETF (DFSU) and United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP (USL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DFSU | USL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.22 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.01 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.34 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.34 | 3.47 | -1.13 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.16 | 7.02 | +3.14 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DFSU | USL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.82 | 2.04 | -0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.58 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.34 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.26 | 0.01 | +1.25 |
Drawdowns
DFSU vs. USL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DFSU drawdown since its inception was -19.88%, smaller than the maximum USL drawdown of -89.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFSU and USL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DFSU | USL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.88% | -89.06% | +69.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.12% | -16.76% | +6.64% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.88% | -23.33% | +3.45% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -33.82% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -66.02% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.69% | -38.16% | +37.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.66% | -61.46% | +58.80% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.32% | 8.27% | -5.95% |
Volatility
DFSU vs. USL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Dimensional US Sustainability Core 1 ETF (DFSU) is 3.02%, while United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP (USL) has a volatility of 10.53%. This indicates that DFSU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than USL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DFSU | USL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.02% | 10.53% | -7.51% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.67% | 23.33% | -13.66% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.03% | 28.54% | -15.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.25% | 30.08% | -13.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.25% | 32.35% | -16.10% |
DFSU vs. USL - Expense Ratio Comparison
DFSU has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than USL's 0.88% expense ratio.
Dividends
DFSU vs. USL - Dividend Comparison
DFSU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.83%, while USL has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFSU Dimensional US Sustainability Core 1 ETF | 0.83% | 0.85% | 0.96% | 1.03% | 0.21% |
USL United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DFSU and USL have a correlation of -0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
USL has higher volatility (10.53%) compared to DFSU (3.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFSU dropped -19.88% vs USL's -89.06%.
On 3-year performance, DFSU leads with 20.21% vs 18.42% for USL. On fees, DFSU is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, DFSU has been the lower-risk option at 3.02%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, DFSU has performed better with a 20.21% return vs 18.42%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DFSU is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.88% for USL.
DFSU has the higher dividend yield at 0.83%, compared with 0.00% for USL.
DFSU is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while USL is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: Dimensional and Concierge Technologies. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for DFSU and 0.88% for USL.
USL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.04 vs 1.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DFSU and USL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer