PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DFSI vs. YCS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DFSI vs. YCS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dimensional International Sustainability Core 1 ETF (DFSI) and ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DFSI achieves a 5.54% return, which is significantly lower than YCS's 7.17% return.


DFSI

1D
-0.92%
1M
2.26%
YTD
5.54%
6M
8.46%
1Y
19.10%
3Y*
16.80%
5Y*
10Y*

YCS

1D
0.17%
1M
4.42%
YTD
7.17%
6M
10.05%
1Y
32.82%
3Y*
19.84%
5Y*
23.54%
10Y*
12.34%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DFSI vs. YCS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
DFSI
Dimensional International Sustainability Core 1 ETF
5.54%33.62%4.98%17.86%11.99%
YCS
ProShares UltraShort Yen
7.17%9.04%35.41%28.70%-21.31%

Correlation

The correlation between DFSI and YCS is -0.44, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.44

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.29

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 3, 2022

-0.28

The correlation between DFSI and YCS shifts across timeframes, from -0.44 (1 year) to -0.28 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DFSI vs. YCS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DFSI
DFSI Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
DFSI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFSI Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFSI Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
DFSI Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFSI Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

YCS
YCS Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
YCS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
YCS Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
YCS Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
YCS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
YCS Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DFSI vs. YCS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional International Sustainability Core 1 ETF (DFSI) and ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DFSIYCSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.64

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.56

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.35

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.57

3.97

-2.41

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.94

12.40

-6.45

DFSI vs. YCS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DFSI Sharpe Ratio is 1.28, which is lower than the YCS Sharpe Ratio of 1.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFSI and YCS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DFSIYCSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.28

1.92

-0.64

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.12

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.65

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.36

0.33

+1.03

Drawdowns

DFSI vs. YCS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFSI drawdown since its inception was -12.82%, smaller than the maximum YCS drawdown of -49.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFSI and YCS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DFSIYCSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.82%

-49.56%

+36.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.26%

-8.30%

-3.96%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.82%

-23.05%

+10.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.32%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.15%

0.00%

-3.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.62%

-19.93%

+17.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.22%

2.66%

+0.56%

Volatility

DFSI vs. YCS - Volatility Comparison

Dimensional International Sustainability Core 1 ETF (DFSI) has a higher volatility of 4.63% compared to ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS) at 2.75%. This indicates that DFSI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than YCS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DFSIYCSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.63%

2.75%

+1.88%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.67%

12.32%

+0.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.97%

17.27%

-2.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.24%

21.10%

-5.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.24%

19.01%

-3.77%

DFSI vs. YCS - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFSI has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is lower than YCS's 1.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

DFSI vs. YCS - Dividend Comparison

DFSI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.14%, while YCS has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
DFSI
Dimensional International Sustainability Core 1 ETF
2.14%2.23%2.39%2.10%0.18%
YCS
ProShares UltraShort Yen
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


DFSI and YCS have a correlation of -0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DFSI has higher volatility (4.63%) compared to YCS (2.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFSI dropped -12.82% vs YCS's -49.56%.

On 3-year performance, YCS leads with 19.84% vs 16.80% for DFSI. On fees, DFSI is cheaper at 0.24% per year. On volatility, YCS has been the lower-risk option at 2.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, YCS has performed better with a 19.84% return vs 16.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DFSI is cheaper with a 0.24% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for YCS.

DFSI has the higher dividend yield at 2.14%, compared with 0.00% for YCS.

DFSI is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while YCS is Leveraged Currency. They also come from different issuers: Dimensional and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.24% for DFSI and 1.00% for YCS.

YCS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.92 vs 1.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DFSI and YCS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer