DFSI vs. TBLU
DFSI (Dimensional International Sustainability Core 1 ETF) and TBLU (Tortoise Global Water Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - DFSI is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund actively managed by Dimensional, while TBLU is a Water Equities fund tracking the Tortoise Global Water ESG Net Total Return Index. DFSI is actively managed, while TBLU is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, DFSI returned 16.89%/yr vs 9.02%/yr for TBLU. Their 0.74 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. DFSI charges 0.24%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for TBLU.
Performance
DFSI vs. TBLU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DFSI achieves a 8.74% return, which is significantly higher than TBLU's 2.00% return.
DFSI
- 1D
- -0.61%
- 1M
- 1.21%
- 6M
- 4.21%
- YTD
- 8.74%
- 1Y
- 21.35%
- 3Y*
- 16.89%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 20.12%
TBLU
- 1D
- -0.27%
- 1M
- -1.11%
- 6M
- -3.93%
- YTD
- 2.00%
- 1Y
- -0.10%
- 3Y*
- 9.02%
- 5Y*
- 3.59%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 9.78%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $2.37M | $2.51M | $2.73M | |
| $60.50K | $60.70K | $110.96K |
DFSI vs. TBLU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFSI Dimensional International Sustainability Core 1 ETF | 8.74% | 33.62% | 4.98% | 17.86% | 10.47% |
TBLU Tortoise Global Water Fund | 2.00% | 11.82% | 8.54% | 20.95% | 4.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between DFSI and TBLU is 0.73, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.73 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.71 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 2, 2022 | 0.74 |
The correlation between DFSI and TBLU has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.
DFSI vs. TBLU - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DFSI
TBLU
Financial Services
-
Industrials
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
-
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
-
Utilities
Real Estate
-
Energy
Financial Services
DFSI
TBLU
-
Industrials
DFSI
TBLU
Technology
DFSI
TBLU
Consumer Cyclical
DFSI
TBLU
Healthcare
DFSI
TBLU
-
Basic Materials
DFSI
TBLU
Consumer Defensive
DFSI
TBLU
Communication Services
DFSI
TBLU
-
Utilities
DFSI
TBLU
Real Estate
DFSI
TBLU
-
Energy
DFSI
TBLU
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DFSI vs. TBLU — Risk / Return Rank
DFSI
TBLU
DFSI vs. TBLU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional International Sustainability Core 1 ETF (DFSI) and Tortoise Global Water Fund (TBLU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DFSI | TBLU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.42 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.96 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.01 | +0.25 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.76 | -0.02 | +1.78 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.56 | -0.03 | +6.60 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DFSI vs. TBLU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DFSI drawdown since its inception was -12.82%, smaller than the maximum TBLU drawdown of -37.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFSI and TBLU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DFSI | TBLU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.82% | -37.58% | +24.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.26% | -13.17% | +0.91% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.62% | -15.42% | +2.80% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -35.36% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.61% | -8.05% | +7.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.59% | -8.16% | +5.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.28% | 6.53% | -3.25% |
Volatility
DFSI vs. TBLU - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Dimensional International Sustainability Core 1 ETF (DFSI) is 4.16%, while Tortoise Global Water Fund (TBLU) has a volatility of 4.54%. This indicates that DFSI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TBLU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DFSI | TBLU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.16% | 4.54% | -0.38% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.46% | 11.89% | +1.57% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.40% | 15.17% | +0.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.25% | 17.42% | -2.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.25% | 18.91% | -3.66% |
DFSI vs. TBLU - Expense Ratio Comparison
DFSI has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is lower than TBLU's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
DFSI vs. TBLU - Dividend Comparison
DFSI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.18%, less than TBLU's 3.47% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFSI Dimensional International Sustainability Core 1 ETF | 2.18% | 2.23% | 2.39% | 2.10% | 0.18% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TBLU Tortoise Global Water Fund | 3.47% | 3.31% | 1.34% | 1.46% | 1.64% | 1.55% | 1.42% | 1.58% | 1.35% | 1.32% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DFSI and TBLU have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TBLU has higher volatility (4.54%) compared to DFSI (4.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFSI dropped -12.82% vs TBLU's -37.58%.
On 3-year performance, DFSI leads with 16.89% vs 9.02% for TBLU. On fees, DFSI is cheaper at 0.24% per year. On volatility, DFSI has been the lower-risk option at 4.16%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, DFSI has performed better with a 16.89% return vs 9.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DFSI is cheaper with a 0.24% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for TBLU.
TBLU has the higher dividend yield at 3.47%, compared with 2.18% for DFSI.
DFSI is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while TBLU is Water Equities. They also come from different issuers: Dimensional and Tortoise. Their fees differ too: 0.24% for DFSI and 0.40% for TBLU.
DFSI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.40 vs -0.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DFSI and TBLU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer