PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DFSI vs. TBLU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DFSI vs. TBLU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dimensional International Sustainability Core 1 ETF (DFSI) and Tortoise Global Water Fund (TBLU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DFSI achieves a 8.74% return, which is significantly higher than TBLU's 2.00% return.


DFSI

1D
-0.61%
1M
1.21%
6M
4.21%
YTD
8.74%
1Y
21.35%
3Y*
16.89%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
20.12%

TBLU

1D
-0.27%
1M
-1.11%
6M
-3.93%
YTD
2.00%
1Y
-0.10%
3Y*
9.02%
5Y*
3.59%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
9.78%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$2.37M$2.51M$2.73M
$60.50K$60.70K$110.96K

DFSI vs. TBLU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
DFSI
Dimensional International Sustainability Core 1 ETF
8.74%33.62%4.98%17.86%10.47%
TBLU
Tortoise Global Water Fund
2.00%11.82%8.54%20.95%4.82%

Correlation

The correlation between DFSI and TBLU is 0.73, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.73

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.71

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 2, 2022

0.74

The correlation between DFSI and TBLU has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.

DFSI vs. TBLU - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DFSI
TBLU

Financial Services

24.9%

-

Industrials

21.5%
64.2%

Technology

11.3%
0.7%

Consumer Cyclical

9.7%
0.8%

Healthcare

9.0%

-

Basic Materials

6.7%
7.9%

Consumer Defensive

5.3%
1.0%

Communication Services

4.9%

-

Utilities

3.0%
24.6%

Real Estate

1.9%

-

Energy

1.9%
0.6%

Financial Services

DFSI
24.9%
TBLU

-

Industrials

DFSI
21.5%
TBLU
64.2%

Technology

DFSI
11.3%
TBLU
0.7%

Consumer Cyclical

DFSI
9.7%
TBLU
0.8%

Healthcare

DFSI
9.0%
TBLU

-

Basic Materials

DFSI
6.7%
TBLU
7.9%

Consumer Defensive

DFSI
5.3%
TBLU
1.0%

Communication Services

DFSI
4.9%
TBLU

-

Utilities

DFSI
3.0%
TBLU
24.6%

Real Estate

DFSI
1.9%
TBLU

-

Energy

DFSI
1.9%
TBLU
0.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DFSI vs. TBLU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

DFSI
DFSI Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
DFSI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFSI Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFSI Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
DFSI Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFSI Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

TBLU
TBLU Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
TBLU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TBLU Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
TBLU Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
TBLU Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
TBLU Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

DFSI vs. TBLU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional International Sustainability Core 1 ETF (DFSI) and Tortoise Global Water Fund (TBLU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DFSITBLUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.42

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.96

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.01

+0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.76

-0.02

+1.78

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.56

-0.03

+6.60

DFSI vs. TBLU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DFSI Sharpe Ratio is 1.40, which is higher than the TBLU Sharpe Ratio of -0.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFSI and TBLU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DFSI vs. TBLU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFSI drawdown since its inception was -12.82%, smaller than the maximum TBLU drawdown of -37.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFSI and TBLU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DFSITBLUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.82%

-37.58%

+24.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.26%

-13.17%

+0.91%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.62%

-15.42%

+2.80%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.61%

-8.05%

+7.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.59%

-8.16%

+5.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.28%

6.53%

-3.25%

Volatility

DFSI vs. TBLU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Dimensional International Sustainability Core 1 ETF (DFSI) is 4.16%, while Tortoise Global Water Fund (TBLU) has a volatility of 4.54%. This indicates that DFSI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TBLU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DFSITBLUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.16%

4.54%

-0.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.46%

11.89%

+1.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.40%

15.17%

+0.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.25%

17.42%

-2.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.25%

18.91%

-3.66%

DFSI vs. TBLU - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFSI has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is lower than TBLU's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

DFSI vs. TBLU - Dividend Comparison

DFSI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.18%, less than TBLU's 3.47% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
DFSI
Dimensional International Sustainability Core 1 ETF
2.18%2.23%2.39%2.10%0.18%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TBLU
Tortoise Global Water Fund
3.47%3.31%1.34%1.46%1.64%1.55%1.42%1.58%1.35%1.32%

Frequently Asked Questions


DFSI and TBLU have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TBLU has higher volatility (4.54%) compared to DFSI (4.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFSI dropped -12.82% vs TBLU's -37.58%.

On 3-year performance, DFSI leads with 16.89% vs 9.02% for TBLU. On fees, DFSI is cheaper at 0.24% per year. On volatility, DFSI has been the lower-risk option at 4.16%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, DFSI has performed better with a 16.89% return vs 9.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DFSI is cheaper with a 0.24% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for TBLU.

TBLU has the higher dividend yield at 3.47%, compared with 2.18% for DFSI.

DFSI is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while TBLU is Water Equities. They also come from different issuers: Dimensional and Tortoise. Their fees differ too: 0.24% for DFSI and 0.40% for TBLU.

DFSI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.40 vs -0.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DFSI and TBLU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer