DFSI vs. KEMX
Compare and contrast key facts about Dimensional International Sustainability Core 1 ETF (DFSI) and KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF (KEMX).
DFSI and KEMX are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. DFSI is an actively managed fund by Dimensional. It was launched on Nov 1, 2022. KEMX is a passively managed fund by CICC that tracks the performance of the MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index. It was launched on Apr 12, 2019.
Performance
DFSI vs. KEMX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
DFSI vs. KEMX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFSI Dimensional International Sustainability Core 1 ETF | -0.80% | 33.62% | 4.98% | 17.86% | 11.99% |
KEMX KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF | 9.35% | 38.28% | 0.36% | 20.57% | 7.80% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DFSI achieves a -0.80% return, which is significantly lower than KEMX's 9.35% return.
DFSI
- 1D
- 3.34%
- 1M
- -8.91%
- YTD
- -0.80%
- 6M
- 4.32%
- 1Y
- 24.49%
- 3Y*
- 14.82%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
KEMX
- 1D
- 4.34%
- 1M
- -11.07%
- YTD
- 9.35%
- 6M
- 21.09%
- 1Y
- 50.32%
- 3Y*
- 20.32%
- 5Y*
- 9.05%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
DFSI vs. KEMX - Expense Ratio Comparison
DFSI has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is lower than KEMX's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
DFSI vs. KEMX — Risk / Return Rank
DFSI
KEMX
DFSI vs. KEMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional International Sustainability Core 1 ETF (DFSI) and KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF (KEMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DFSI | KEMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.46 | 2.36 | -0.91 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.02 | 3.00 | -0.99 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.44 | -0.14 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.90 | 3.25 | -1.35 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.87 | 13.60 | -5.73 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DFSI | KEMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.46 | 2.36 | -0.91 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.52 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.31 | 0.50 | +0.80 |
Correlation
The correlation between DFSI and KEMX is 0.73, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
DFSI vs. KEMX - Dividend Comparison
DFSI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.28%, less than KEMX's 3.00% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFSI Dimensional International Sustainability Core 1 ETF | 2.28% | 2.23% | 2.39% | 2.10% | 0.18% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
KEMX KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF | 3.00% | 3.28% | 3.39% | 2.00% | 4.10% | 4.79% | 1.69% | 2.77% |
Drawdowns
DFSI vs. KEMX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DFSI drawdown since its inception was -12.82%, smaller than the maximum KEMX drawdown of -38.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFSI and KEMX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| DFSI | KEMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.82% | -38.80% | +25.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.26% | -15.36% | +3.10% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -30.85% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.97% | -11.68% | +2.71% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.56% | -9.02% | +6.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.96% | 3.67% | -0.71% |
Volatility
DFSI vs. KEMX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Dimensional International Sustainability Core 1 ETF (DFSI) is 8.32%, while KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF (KEMX) has a volatility of 12.58%. This indicates that DFSI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KEMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| DFSI | KEMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.32% | 12.58% | -4.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.20% | 16.96% | -5.76% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.90% | 21.39% | -4.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.04% | 17.55% | -2.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.04% | 20.61% | -5.57% |