PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DFSI vs. DFIV
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

DFSI vs. DFIV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dimensional International Sustainability Core 1 ETF (DFSI) and Dimensional International Value ETF (DFIV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

DFSI vs. DFIV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
DFSI
Dimensional International Sustainability Core 1 ETF
-0.80%33.62%4.98%17.86%11.99%
DFIV
Dimensional International Value ETF
5.98%45.36%7.26%17.75%11.23%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DFSI achieves a -0.80% return, which is significantly lower than DFIV's 5.98% return.


DFSI

1D
3.34%
1M
-8.91%
YTD
-0.80%
6M
4.32%
1Y
24.49%
3Y*
14.82%
5Y*
10Y*

DFIV

1D
2.74%
1M
-5.65%
YTD
5.98%
6M
15.53%
1Y
38.38%
3Y*
22.24%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


DFSI vs. DFIV - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFSI has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is lower than DFIV's 0.27% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

DFSI vs. DFIV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DFSI
DFSI Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
DFSI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFSI Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFSI Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
DFSI Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFSI Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

DFIV
DFIV Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
DFIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFIV Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
DFIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFIV Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DFSI vs. DFIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional International Sustainability Core 1 ETF (DFSI) and Dimensional International Value ETF (DFIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DFSIDFIVDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.46

2.25

-0.79

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.02

2.94

-0.92

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.46

-0.16

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.90

3.08

-1.17

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.87

13.72

-5.85

DFSI vs. DFIV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DFSI Sharpe Ratio is 1.46, which is lower than the DFIV Sharpe Ratio of 2.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFSI and DFIV, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DFSIDFIVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.46

2.25

-0.79

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.31

0.89

+0.42

Correlation

The correlation between DFSI and DFIV is 0.91, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

DFSI vs. DFIV - Dividend Comparison

DFSI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.28%, less than DFIV's 2.69% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021
DFSI
Dimensional International Sustainability Core 1 ETF
2.28%2.23%2.39%2.10%0.18%0.00%
DFIV
Dimensional International Value ETF
2.69%2.92%3.88%3.93%3.84%2.30%

Drawdowns

DFSI vs. DFIV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFSI drawdown since its inception was -12.82%, smaller than the maximum DFIV drawdown of -25.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFSI and DFIV.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


DFSIDFIVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.82%

-25.42%

+12.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.26%

-12.12%

-0.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.97%

-5.95%

-3.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.56%

-4.58%

+2.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.96%

2.72%

+0.24%

Volatility

DFSI vs. DFIV - Volatility Comparison

Dimensional International Sustainability Core 1 ETF (DFSI) has a higher volatility of 8.32% compared to Dimensional International Value ETF (DFIV) at 6.81%. This indicates that DFSI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DFIV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


DFSIDFIVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.32%

6.81%

+1.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.20%

10.46%

+0.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.90%

17.16%

-0.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.04%

16.71%

-1.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.04%

16.71%

-1.67%