DFSI vs. CIL

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

DFSI (Dimensional International Sustainability Core 1 ETF) and CIL (VictoryShares International Volatility Wtd ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. DFSI is actively managed, while CIL is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, DFSI returned 16.80%/yr vs 15.59%/yr for CIL. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DFSI charges 0.24%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for CIL.

Performance

DFSI vs. CIL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dimensional International Sustainability Core 1 ETF (DFSI) and VictoryShares International Volatility Wtd ETF (CIL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with DFSI having a 5.54% return and CIL slightly lower at 5.44%.

DFSI

• 1D: -0.92%
• 1M: 2.26%
• YTD: 5.54%
• 6M: 8.46%
• 1Y: 19.10%
• 3Y*: 16.80%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CIL

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: 5.44%
• 6M: 7.94%
• 1Y: 17.37%
• 3Y*: 15.59%
• 5Y*: 7.45%
• 10Y*: 8.21%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DFSI vs. CIL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
DFSI Dimensional International Sustainability Core 1 ETF	5.54%	33.62%	4.98%	17.86%	11.99%
CIL VictoryShares International Volatility Wtd ETF	5.44%	32.99%	3.76%	16.29%	9.21%

Correlation

The correlation between DFSI and CIL is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.70
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.86
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 3, 2022	0.86

The correlation between DFSI and CIL shifts across timeframes, from 0.69 (1 year) to 0.86 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

DFSI vs. CIL - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	DFSI	CIL
Industrials	27.9%	18.4%
Financial Services	27.7%	24.8%
Consumer Cyclical	14.2%	8.2%
Consumer Defensive	8.1%	8.8%
Basic Materials	7.4%	6.6%
Healthcare	3.7%	7.7%
Real Estate	3.4%	2.2%
Technology	3.0%	6.4%
Communication Services	1.8%	5.8%
Utilities	1.7%	6.6%
Energy	1.3%	4.6%

Return for Risk

DFSI vs. CIL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DFSI

DFSI Risk / Return Rank: 35
DFSI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 36
DFSI Sortino Ratio Rank: 35
DFSI Omega Ratio Rank: 36
DFSI Calmar Ratio Rank: 32
DFSI Martin Ratio Rank: 38

CIL

CIL Risk / Return Rank: 76
CIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
CIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
CIL Omega Ratio Rank: 81
CIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 78
CIL Martin Ratio Rank: 83

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DFSI vs. CIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional International Sustainability Core 1 ETF (DFSI) and VictoryShares International Volatility Wtd ETF (CIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	DFSI	CIL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.28	2.24	-0.95
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.88	3.22	-1.33
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	1.49	-0.25
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.57	3.95	-2.38
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.94	16.75	-10.81
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

DFSI vs. CIL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DFSI Sharpe Ratio is 1.28, which is lower than the CIL Sharpe Ratio of 2.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFSI and CIL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	DFSI	CIL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.28	2.24	-0.95
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.46	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.48	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.36	0.43	+0.92

Drawdowns

DFSI vs. CIL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFSI drawdown since its inception was -12.82%, smaller than the maximum CIL drawdown of -36.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFSI and CIL.

Drawdown Indicators

	DFSI	CIL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-12.82%	-36.27%	+23.45%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.26%	-4.60%	-7.66%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-12.82%	-11.96%	-0.86%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-29.89%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-36.27%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.15%	-0.58%	-2.57%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.62%	-6.56%	+3.94%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.22%	1.07%	+2.15%

Volatility

DFSI vs. CIL - Volatility Comparison

Dimensional International Sustainability Core 1 ETF (DFSI) has a higher volatility of 4.63% compared to VictoryShares International Volatility Wtd ETF (CIL) at 0.00%. This indicates that DFSI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DFSI	CIL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.63%	0.00%	+4.63%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.67%	4.23%	+8.44%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.97%	8.19%	+6.78%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.24%	16.49%	-1.25%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.24%	17.17%	-1.93%

DFSI vs. CIL - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFSI has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is lower than CIL's 0.45% expense ratio.

Dividends

DFSI vs. CIL - Dividend Comparison

DFSI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.14%, more than CIL's 1.67% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CIL VictoryShares International Volatility Wtd ETF	1.67%	2.70%	3.46%	2.91%	2.41%	3.04%	1.73%	2.69%	2.85%	2.17%	2.34%	0.43%
DFSI Dimensional International Sustainability Core 1 ETF	2.14%	2.23%	2.39%	2.10%	0.18%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DFSI and CIL in my portfolio?

DFSI and CIL have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DFSI or CIL?

DFSI has higher volatility (4.63%) compared to CIL (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFSI dropped -12.82% vs CIL's -36.27%.

Which ETF is better, DFSI or CIL?

On 3-year performance, DFSI leads with 16.80% vs 15.59% for CIL. On fees, DFSI is cheaper at 0.24% per year. On volatility, CIL has been the lower-risk option at 0.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DFSI or CIL?

Over the 3-year period, DFSI has performed better with a 16.80% return vs 15.59%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DFSI or CIL?

DFSI is cheaper with a 0.24% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for CIL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DFSI or CIL?

DFSI has the higher dividend yield at 2.14%, compared with 1.67% for CIL.

What is the main difference between DFSI and CIL?

They also come from different issuers: Dimensional and Crestview. Their fees differ too: 0.24% for DFSI and 0.45% for CIL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CIL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.24 vs 1.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.