PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DFSE vs. DGS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DFSE vs. DGS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dimensional Emerging Markets Sustainability Core 1 ETF (DFSE) and WisdomTree Emerging Markets SmallCap Dividend Fund (DGS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DFSE achieves a 21.02% return, which is significantly higher than DGS's 14.53% return.


DFSE

1D
-1.66%
1M
5.84%
YTD
21.02%
6M
22.69%
1Y
42.80%
3Y*
21.00%
5Y*
10Y*

DGS

1D
-1.37%
1M
2.58%
YTD
14.53%
6M
15.57%
1Y
27.26%
3Y*
16.17%
5Y*
7.85%
10Y*
9.93%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DFSE vs. DGS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
DFSE
Dimensional Emerging Markets Sustainability Core 1 ETF
21.02%28.22%6.90%14.66%11.62%
DGS
WisdomTree Emerging Markets SmallCap Dividend Fund
14.53%21.18%1.13%19.08%11.63%

Correlation

The correlation between DFSE and DGS is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 3, 2022

0.89

The correlation between DFSE and DGS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DFSE vs. DGS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DFSE
DFSE Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
DFSE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFSE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFSE Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
DFSE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFSE Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

DGS
DGS Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
DGS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DGS Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
DGS Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
DGS Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
DGS Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DFSE vs. DGS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional Emerging Markets Sustainability Core 1 ETF (DFSE) and WisdomTree Emerging Markets SmallCap Dividend Fund (DGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DFSEDGSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.54

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.63

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.32

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.34

2.72

+0.62

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.45

9.16

+3.29

DFSE vs. DGS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DFSE Sharpe Ratio is 2.30, which is higher than the DGS Sharpe Ratio of 1.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFSE and DGS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DFSEDGSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.30

1.76

+0.54

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.34

0.23

+1.11

Drawdowns

DFSE vs. DGS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFSE drawdown since its inception was -19.77%, smaller than the maximum DGS drawdown of -61.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFSE and DGS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DFSEDGSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.77%

-61.83%

+42.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.88%

-10.06%

-2.82%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.77%

-19.31%

-0.46%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.86%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.66%

-1.40%

-0.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.99%

-12.59%

+8.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.45%

2.98%

+0.47%

Volatility

DFSE vs. DGS - Volatility Comparison

Dimensional Emerging Markets Sustainability Core 1 ETF (DFSE) has a higher volatility of 7.93% compared to WisdomTree Emerging Markets SmallCap Dividend Fund (DGS) at 5.24%. This indicates that DFSE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DGS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DFSEDGSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.93%

5.24%

+2.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.13%

13.03%

+3.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.72%

15.56%

+3.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.63%

14.87%

+2.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.63%

17.32%

+0.31%

DFSE vs. DGS - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFSE has a 0.41% expense ratio, which is lower than DGS's 0.58% expense ratio.


Dividends

DFSE vs. DGS - Dividend Comparison

DFSE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.84%, less than DGS's 3.21% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DFSE
Dimensional Emerging Markets Sustainability Core 1 ETF
1.84%2.26%2.06%2.06%0.36%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
DGS
WisdomTree Emerging Markets SmallCap Dividend Fund
3.21%3.45%3.36%4.55%5.34%3.98%3.69%3.95%4.24%2.81%3.42%3.28%

Frequently Asked Questions


DFSE and DGS have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DFSE has higher volatility (7.93%) compared to DGS (5.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFSE dropped -19.77% vs DGS's -61.83%.

On 3-year performance, DFSE leads with 21.00% vs 16.17% for DGS. On fees, DFSE is cheaper at 0.41% per year. On volatility, DGS has been the lower-risk option at 5.24%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, DFSE has performed better with a 21.00% return vs 16.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DFSE is cheaper with a 0.41% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for DGS.

DGS has the higher dividend yield at 3.21%, compared with 1.84% for DFSE.

They also come from different issuers: Dimensional and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.41% for DFSE and 0.58% for DGS.

DFSE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.30 vs 1.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DFSE and DGS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer