PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DFSE vs. DFAE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DFSE vs. DFAE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dimensional Emerging Markets Sustainability Core 1 ETF (DFSE) and Dimensional Emerging Core Equity Market ETF (DFAE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DFSE achieves a 13.49% return, which is significantly lower than DFAE's 17.88% return.


DFSE

1D
-3.34%
1M
-4.77%
6M
8.47%
YTD
13.49%
1Y
25.67%
3Y*
16.55%
5Y*
10Y*

DFAE

1D
-3.22%
1M
-4.33%
6M
11.90%
YTD
17.88%
1Y
34.17%
3Y*
18.98%
5Y*
8.17%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DFSE vs. DFAE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
DFSE
Dimensional Emerging Markets Sustainability Core 1 ETF
13.49%28.22%6.90%14.66%10.68%
DFAE
Dimensional Emerging Core Equity Market ETF
17.88%31.48%7.68%12.63%9.95%

Correlation

The correlation between DFSE and DFAE is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 2, 2022

0.96

The correlation between DFSE and DFAE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DFSE vs. DFAE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DFSE
DFSE Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
DFSE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFSE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFSE Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
DFSE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFSE Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank

DFAE
DFAE Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
DFAE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFAE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFAE Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
DFAE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFAE Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DFSE vs. DFAE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional Emerging Markets Sustainability Core 1 ETF (DFSE) and Dimensional Emerging Core Equity Market ETF (DFAE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DFSEDFAEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.34

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.37

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.30

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.00

2.68

-0.68

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.80

9.22

-2.43

DFSE vs. DFAE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DFSE Sharpe Ratio is 1.20, which is comparable to the DFAE Sharpe Ratio of 1.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFSE and DFAE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DFSE vs. DFAE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFSE drawdown since its inception was -19.77%, smaller than the maximum DFAE drawdown of -32.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFSE and DFAE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DFSEDFAEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.77%

-32.21%

+12.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.88%

-12.80%

-0.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.77%

-18.12%

-1.65%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.78%

-8.62%

+0.84%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.01%

-10.21%

+6.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.79%

3.71%

+0.08%

Volatility

DFSE vs. DFAE - Volatility Comparison

Dimensional Emerging Markets Sustainability Core 1 ETF (DFSE) and Dimensional Emerging Core Equity Market ETF (DFAE) have volatilities of 9.95% and 10.47%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DFSEDFAEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.95%

10.47%

-0.52%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.53%

20.45%

-0.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.47%

22.33%

-0.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.36%

18.57%

-0.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.36%

18.43%

-0.07%

DFSE vs. DFAE - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFSE has a 0.41% expense ratio, which is higher than DFAE's 0.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

DFSE vs. DFAE - Dividend Comparison

DFSE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.95%, more than DFAE's 1.84% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
DFAE
Dimensional Emerging Core Equity Market ETF
1.84%2.20%2.35%2.43%2.85%1.63%0.01%
DFSE
Dimensional Emerging Markets Sustainability Core 1 ETF
1.95%2.26%2.06%2.06%0.36%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, DFSE and DFAE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

DFAE has higher volatility (10.47%) compared to DFSE (9.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFSE dropped -19.77% vs DFAE's -32.21%.

On 3-year performance, DFAE leads with 18.98% vs 16.55% for DFSE. On fees, DFAE is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, DFSE has been the lower-risk option at 9.95%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, DFAE has performed better with a 18.98% return vs 16.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DFAE is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.41% for DFSE.

DFSE has the higher dividend yield at 1.95%, compared with 1.84% for DFAE.

DFSE is categorized as Emerging Markets Diversified, while DFAE is Emerging Markets Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.41% for DFSE and 0.29% for DFAE.

DFAE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.54 vs 1.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DFSE and DFAE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer