PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DFSE vs. DFIV
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

DFSE vs. DFIV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dimensional Emerging Markets Sustainability Core 1 ETF (DFSE) and Dimensional International Value ETF (DFIV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

DFSE vs. DFIV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
DFSE
Dimensional Emerging Markets Sustainability Core 1 ETF
2.27%28.22%6.90%14.66%11.62%
DFIV
Dimensional International Value ETF
5.98%45.36%7.26%17.75%11.23%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DFSE achieves a 2.27% return, which is significantly lower than DFIV's 5.98% return.


DFSE

1D
3.27%
1M
-8.75%
YTD
2.27%
6M
3.96%
1Y
28.74%
3Y*
14.83%
5Y*
10Y*

DFIV

1D
2.74%
1M
-5.65%
YTD
5.98%
6M
15.53%
1Y
38.38%
3Y*
22.24%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


DFSE vs. DFIV - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFSE has a 0.41% expense ratio, which is higher than DFIV's 0.27% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

DFSE vs. DFIV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DFSE
DFSE Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
DFSE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFSE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFSE Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
DFSE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFSE Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

DFIV
DFIV Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
DFIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFIV Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
DFIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFIV Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DFSE vs. DFIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional Emerging Markets Sustainability Core 1 ETF (DFSE) and Dimensional International Value ETF (DFIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DFSEDFIVDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.50

2.25

-0.75

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.06

2.94

-0.87

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.46

-0.17

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.16

3.08

-0.91

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.14

13.72

-5.58

DFSE vs. DFIV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DFSE Sharpe Ratio is 1.50, which is lower than the DFIV Sharpe Ratio of 2.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFSE and DFIV, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DFSEDFIVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.50

2.25

-0.75

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.10

0.89

+0.21

Correlation

The correlation between DFSE and DFIV is 0.70, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

DFSE vs. DFIV - Dividend Comparison

DFSE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.18%, less than DFIV's 2.69% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021
DFSE
Dimensional Emerging Markets Sustainability Core 1 ETF
2.18%2.26%2.06%2.06%0.36%0.00%
DFIV
Dimensional International Value ETF
2.69%2.92%3.88%3.93%3.84%2.30%

Drawdowns

DFSE vs. DFIV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFSE drawdown since its inception was -19.77%, smaller than the maximum DFIV drawdown of -25.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFSE and DFIV.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


DFSEDFIVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.77%

-25.42%

+5.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.88%

-12.12%

-0.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.03%

-5.95%

-4.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.07%

-4.58%

+0.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.42%

2.72%

+0.70%

Volatility

DFSE vs. DFIV - Volatility Comparison

Dimensional Emerging Markets Sustainability Core 1 ETF (DFSE) has a higher volatility of 9.85% compared to Dimensional International Value ETF (DFIV) at 6.81%. This indicates that DFSE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DFIV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


DFSEDFIVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.85%

6.81%

+3.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.91%

10.46%

+3.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.20%

17.16%

+2.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.09%

16.71%

+0.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.09%

16.71%

+0.38%