PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DFSE vs. DFIV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DFSE vs. DFIV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dimensional Emerging Markets Sustainability Core 1 ETF (DFSE) and Dimensional International Value ETF (DFIV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DFSE achieves a 21.02% return, which is significantly higher than DFIV's 11.54% return.


DFSE

1D
-1.66%
1M
5.84%
YTD
21.02%
6M
22.69%
1Y
42.80%
3Y*
21.00%
5Y*
10Y*

DFIV

1D
-0.70%
1M
2.57%
YTD
11.54%
6M
15.41%
1Y
34.88%
3Y*
23.90%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DFSE vs. DFIV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
DFSE
Dimensional Emerging Markets Sustainability Core 1 ETF
21.02%28.22%6.90%14.66%11.62%
DFIV
Dimensional International Value ETF
11.54%45.36%7.26%17.75%11.23%

Correlation

The correlation between DFSE and DFIV is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.67

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.69

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 3, 2022

0.70

The correlation between DFSE and DFIV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.67 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.

DFSE vs. DFIV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DFSE
DFIV

Technology

31.2%
2.8%

Financial Services

13.9%
32.4%

Industrials

12.5%
9.6%

Consumer Cyclical

10.6%
9.6%

Basic Materials

6.2%
10.9%

Communication Services

5.8%
4.2%

Healthcare

4.7%
4.9%

Consumer Defensive

3.9%
4.9%

Real Estate

2.2%
1.8%

Utilities

1.8%
2.5%

Energy

1.0%
16.4%

Technology

DFSE
31.2%
DFIV
2.8%

Financial Services

DFSE
13.9%
DFIV
32.4%

Industrials

DFSE
12.5%
DFIV
9.6%

Consumer Cyclical

DFSE
10.6%
DFIV
9.6%

Basic Materials

DFSE
6.2%
DFIV
10.9%

Communication Services

DFSE
5.8%
DFIV
4.2%

Healthcare

DFSE
4.7%
DFIV
4.9%

Consumer Defensive

DFSE
3.9%
DFIV
4.9%

Real Estate

DFSE
2.2%
DFIV
1.8%

Utilities

DFSE
1.8%
DFIV
2.5%

Energy

DFSE
1.0%
DFIV
16.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DFSE vs. DFIV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DFSE
DFSE Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
DFSE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFSE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFSE Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
DFSE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFSE Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

DFIV
DFIV Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
DFIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFIV Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
DFIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFIV Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DFSE vs. DFIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional Emerging Markets Sustainability Core 1 ETF (DFSE) and Dimensional International Value ETF (DFIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DFSEDFIVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.27

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.44

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.46

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.34

3.63

-0.29

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.45

14.02

-1.57

DFSE vs. DFIV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DFSE Sharpe Ratio is 2.30, which is comparable to the DFIV Sharpe Ratio of 2.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFSE and DFIV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DFSEDFIVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.30

2.56

-0.27

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.34

0.94

+0.40

Drawdowns

DFSE vs. DFIV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFSE drawdown since its inception was -19.77%, smaller than the maximum DFIV drawdown of -25.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFSE and DFIV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DFSEDFIVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.77%

-25.42%

+5.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.88%

-9.66%

-3.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.77%

-14.72%

-5.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.66%

-1.02%

-0.64%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.99%

-4.48%

+0.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.45%

2.49%

+0.96%

Volatility

DFSE vs. DFIV - Volatility Comparison

Dimensional Emerging Markets Sustainability Core 1 ETF (DFSE) has a higher volatility of 7.93% compared to Dimensional International Value ETF (DFIV) at 3.89%. This indicates that DFSE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DFIV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DFSEDFIVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.93%

3.89%

+4.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.13%

10.99%

+5.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.72%

13.69%

+5.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.63%

16.63%

+1.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.63%

16.63%

+1.00%

DFSE vs. DFIV - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFSE has a 0.41% expense ratio, which is higher than DFIV's 0.27% expense ratio.


Dividends

DFSE vs. DFIV - Dividend Comparison

DFSE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.84%, less than DFIV's 2.55% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
DFIV
Dimensional International Value ETF
2.55%2.92%3.88%3.93%3.84%2.30%
DFSE
Dimensional Emerging Markets Sustainability Core 1 ETF
1.84%2.26%2.06%2.06%0.36%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


DFSE and DFIV have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DFSE has higher volatility (7.93%) compared to DFIV (3.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFSE dropped -19.77% vs DFIV's -25.42%.

On 3-year performance, DFIV leads with 23.90% vs 21.00% for DFSE. On fees, DFIV is cheaper at 0.27% per year. On volatility, DFIV has been the lower-risk option at 3.89%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, DFIV has performed better with a 23.90% return vs 21.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DFIV is cheaper with a 0.27% expense ratio, compared with 0.41% for DFSE.

DFIV has the higher dividend yield at 2.55%, compared with 1.84% for DFSE.

DFSE is categorized as Emerging Markets Diversified, while DFIV is Foreign Large Cap Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.41% for DFSE and 0.27% for DFIV.

DFIV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.56 vs 2.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DFSE and DFIV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer