PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DFSE vs. BNO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DFSE vs. BNO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dimensional Emerging Markets Sustainability Core 1 ETF (DFSE) and United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DFSE achieves a 21.02% return, which is significantly lower than BNO's 90.47% return.


DFSE

1D
-1.66%
1M
5.84%
YTD
21.02%
6M
22.69%
1Y
42.80%
3Y*
21.00%
5Y*
10Y*

BNO

1D
1.99%
1M
-10.29%
YTD
90.47%
6M
86.00%
1Y
91.89%
3Y*
27.93%
5Y*
24.16%
10Y*
13.60%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DFSE vs. BNO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
DFSE
Dimensional Emerging Markets Sustainability Core 1 ETF
21.02%28.22%6.90%14.66%11.62%
BNO
United States Brent Oil Fund LP
90.47%-5.44%9.67%-3.43%-9.33%

Correlation

The correlation between DFSE and BNO is -0.31, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.31

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.01

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 3, 2022

0.05

The correlation between DFSE and BNO shifts across timeframes, from -0.31 (1 year) to 0.05 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DFSE vs. BNO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DFSE
DFSE Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
DFSE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFSE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFSE Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
DFSE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFSE Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

BNO
BNO Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
BNO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BNO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
BNO Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
BNO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
BNO Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DFSE vs. BNO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional Emerging Markets Sustainability Core 1 ETF (DFSE) and United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DFSEBNODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.33

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.38

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.34

5.17

-1.83

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.45

9.76

+2.69

DFSE vs. BNO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DFSE Sharpe Ratio is 2.30, which is comparable to the BNO Sharpe Ratio of 2.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFSE and BNO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DFSEBNODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.30

2.23

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.37

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.34

0.14

+1.20

Drawdowns

DFSE vs. BNO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFSE drawdown since its inception was -19.77%, smaller than the maximum BNO drawdown of -87.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFSE and BNO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DFSEBNODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.77%

-87.06%

+67.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.88%

-17.87%

+4.99%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.77%

-23.75%

+3.98%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.70%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-75.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.66%

-10.29%

+8.63%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.99%

-40.17%

+36.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.45%

9.45%

-6.00%

Volatility

DFSE vs. BNO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Dimensional Emerging Markets Sustainability Core 1 ETF (DFSE) is 7.93%, while United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO) has a volatility of 14.22%. This indicates that DFSE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BNO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DFSEBNODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.93%

14.22%

-6.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.13%

36.10%

-19.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.72%

41.46%

-22.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.63%

35.38%

-17.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.63%

36.68%

-19.05%

DFSE vs. BNO - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFSE has a 0.41% expense ratio, which is lower than BNO's 0.90% expense ratio.


Dividends

DFSE vs. BNO - Dividend Comparison

DFSE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.84%, while BNO has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
BNO
United States Brent Oil Fund LP
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
DFSE
Dimensional Emerging Markets Sustainability Core 1 ETF
1.84%2.26%2.06%2.06%0.36%

Frequently Asked Questions


DFSE and BNO have a correlation of -0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BNO has higher volatility (14.22%) compared to DFSE (7.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFSE dropped -19.77% vs BNO's -87.06%.

On 3-year performance, BNO leads with 27.93% vs 21.00% for DFSE. On fees, DFSE is cheaper at 0.41% per year. On volatility, DFSE has been the lower-risk option at 7.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, BNO has performed better with a 27.93% return vs 21.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DFSE is cheaper with a 0.41% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for BNO.

DFSE has the higher dividend yield at 1.84%, compared with 0.00% for BNO.

DFSE is categorized as Emerging Markets Diversified, while BNO is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: Dimensional and Concierge Technologies. Their fees differ too: 0.41% for DFSE and 0.90% for BNO.

DFSE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.30 vs 2.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DFSE and BNO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer