PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DFRSX vs. DFJSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DFRSX vs. DFJSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DFA Asia Pacific Small Company (DFRSX) and DFA Japanese Small Company Portfolio (DFJSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DFRSX achieves a 1.77% return, which is significantly lower than DFJSX's 14.31% return. Over the past 10 years, DFRSX has underperformed DFJSX with an annualized return of 5.87%, while DFJSX has yielded a comparatively higher 8.49% annualized return.


DFRSX

1D
-0.23%
1M
1.63%
6M
-4.63%
YTD
1.77%
1Y
18.49%
3Y*
12.02%
5Y*
3.94%
10Y*
5.87%
ALL TIME*
6.13%

DFJSX

1D
-1.61%
1M
-0.34%
6M
8.01%
YTD
14.31%
1Y
25.56%
3Y*
18.97%
5Y*
9.64%
10Y*
8.49%
ALL TIME*
6.04%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

DFRSX vs. DFJSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DFRSX
DFA Asia Pacific Small Company
1.77%34.73%0.27%3.99%-16.96%12.59%14.24%13.30%-15.48%25.17%
DFJSX
DFA Japanese Small Company Portfolio
14.31%31.65%4.35%17.08%-11.36%-0.39%3.78%18.23%-19.56%35.69%

Correlation

The correlation between DFRSX and DFJSX is 0.52, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.52

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.56

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.58

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.56

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 20, 1996

0.47

The correlation between DFRSX and DFJSX shifts across timeframes, from 0.47 (all time) to 0.58 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DFRSX vs. DFJSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

DFRSX
DFRSX Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
DFRSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFRSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFRSX Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
DFRSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFRSX Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

DFJSX
DFJSX Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
DFJSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFJSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFJSX Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
DFJSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFJSX Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

DFRSX vs. DFJSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DFA Asia Pacific Small Company (DFRSX) and DFA Japanese Small Company Portfolio (DFJSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DFRSXDFJSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.52

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.74

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.30

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.32

2.31

-0.99

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.23

6.94

-3.72

DFRSX vs. DFJSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DFRSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.15, which is lower than the DFJSX Sharpe Ratio of 1.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFRSX and DFJSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DFRSX vs. DFJSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFRSX drawdown since its inception was -69.06%, smaller than the maximum DFJSX drawdown of -76.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFRSX and DFJSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DFRSXDFJSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-69.06%

-76.17%

+7.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.20%

-12.53%

-1.67%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.29%

-13.31%

-7.98%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.18%

-31.39%

+1.21%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.25%

-40.32%

-5.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.46%

-2.76%

-5.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.17%

-29.98%

+12.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.79%

4.15%

+1.64%

Volatility

DFRSX vs. DFJSX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for DFA Asia Pacific Small Company (DFRSX) is 4.40%, while DFA Japanese Small Company Portfolio (DFJSX) has a volatility of 6.54%. This indicates that DFRSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DFJSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DFRSXDFJSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.40%

6.54%

-2.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.70%

14.11%

-0.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.40%

17.45%

-1.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.41%

16.42%

+0.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.05%

16.65%

+0.40%

DFRSX vs. DFJSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both DFRSX and DFJSX have an expense ratio of 0.42%.


Dividends

DFRSX vs. DFJSX - Dividend Comparison

DFRSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.83%, more than DFJSX's 3.05% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DFJSX
DFA Japanese Small Company Portfolio
3.05%3.49%3.16%6.45%5.44%5.26%2.14%3.98%7.50%2.41%1.97%1.38%
DFRSX
DFA Asia Pacific Small Company
4.83%4.92%4.66%4.70%9.99%12.82%2.91%4.56%3.48%4.01%3.79%3.96%

Frequently Asked Questions


DFRSX and DFJSX have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DFJSX has higher volatility (6.54%) compared to DFRSX (4.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFRSX dropped -69.06% vs DFJSX's -76.17%.

DFJSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.66 vs 1.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DFRSX and DFJSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer