DFRSX vs. DFFVX
Compare and contrast key facts about DFA Asia Pacific Small Company (DFRSX) and DFA U.S. Targeted Value Portfolio (DFFVX).
DFRSX is managed by Dimensional. It was launched on Jan 4, 1993. DFFVX is managed by Dimensional. It was launched on Feb 23, 2000.
Performance
DFRSX vs. DFFVX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
DFRSX vs. DFFVX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFRSX DFA Asia Pacific Small Company | -4.61% | 34.73% | 0.27% | 3.99% | -16.96% | 12.59% | 14.24% | 13.30% | -15.48% | 25.17% |
DFFVX DFA U.S. Targeted Value Portfolio | 3.27% | 9.53% | 9.34% | 19.37% | -4.66% | 31.53% | 3.78% | 21.51% | -15.79% | 9.20% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DFRSX achieves a -4.61% return, which is significantly lower than DFFVX's 3.27% return. Over the past 10 years, DFRSX has underperformed DFFVX with an annualized return of 6.02%, while DFFVX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.23% annualized return.
DFRSX
- 1D
- -0.63%
- 1M
- -12.55%
- YTD
- -4.61%
- 6M
- -2.53%
- 1Y
- 27.45%
- 3Y*
- 9.69%
- 5Y*
- 3.60%
- 10Y*
- 6.02%
DFFVX
- 1D
- -0.57%
- 1M
- -5.78%
- YTD
- 3.27%
- 6M
- 6.24%
- 1Y
- 21.73%
- 3Y*
- 13.51%
- 5Y*
- 8.15%
- 10Y*
- 10.23%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
DFRSX vs. DFFVX - Expense Ratio Comparison
DFRSX has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is higher than DFFVX's 0.29% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
DFRSX vs. DFFVX — Risk / Return Rank
DFRSX
DFFVX
DFRSX vs. DFFVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DFA Asia Pacific Small Company (DFRSX) and DFA U.S. Targeted Value Portfolio (DFFVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DFRSX | DFFVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.45 | 0.97 | +0.48 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.90 | 1.49 | +0.41 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.21 | +0.09 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.82 | 1.31 | +0.50 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.50 | 4.88 | +1.61 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DFRSX | DFFVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.45 | 0.97 | +0.48 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.21 | 0.38 | -0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.36 | 0.43 | -0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.32 | 0.45 | -0.14 |
Correlation
The correlation between DFRSX and DFFVX is 0.55, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
DFRSX vs. DFFVX - Dividend Comparison
DFRSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.15%, more than DFFVX's 1.66% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFRSX DFA Asia Pacific Small Company | 5.15% | 4.92% | 4.66% | 4.70% | 9.99% | 12.82% | 2.91% | 4.56% | 3.48% | 4.01% | 3.79% | 3.96% |
DFFVX DFA U.S. Targeted Value Portfolio | 1.66% | 1.69% | 1.40% | 2.26% | 5.17% | 2.74% | 1.52% | 3.82% | 5.95% | 5.16% | 3.95% | 5.84% |
Drawdowns
DFRSX vs. DFFVX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DFRSX drawdown since its inception was -69.06%, which is greater than DFFVX's maximum drawdown of -64.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFRSX and DFFVX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| DFRSX | DFFVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -69.06% | -64.21% | -4.85% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.20% | -14.71% | +0.51% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.18% | -26.09% | -4.09% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.25% | -50.75% | +4.50% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.20% | -8.07% | -6.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.28% | -9.76% | -7.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.97% | 3.96% | +0.01% |
Volatility
DFRSX vs. DFFVX - Volatility Comparison
DFA Asia Pacific Small Company (DFRSX) has a higher volatility of 6.08% compared to DFA U.S. Targeted Value Portfolio (DFFVX) at 4.90%. This indicates that DFRSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DFFVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| DFRSX | DFFVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.08% | 4.90% | +1.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.03% | 12.20% | -0.17% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.54% | 22.60% | -4.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.14% | 21.69% | -4.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.98% | 23.67% | -6.69% |