PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DFRA vs. CDC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DFRA vs. CDC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Donoghue Forlines Yield Enhanced Real Asset ETF (DFRA) and VictoryShares US EQ Income Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF (CDC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DFRA achieves a 8.60% return, which is significantly lower than CDC's 10.57% return.


DFRA

1D
-0.14%
1M
-2.02%
YTD
8.60%
6M
8.04%
1Y
15.09%
3Y*
12.75%
5Y*
10Y*

CDC

1D
-0.57%
1M
-0.39%
YTD
10.57%
6M
10.29%
1Y
18.16%
3Y*
11.97%
5Y*
5.08%
10Y*
10.03%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DFRA vs. CDC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
DFRA
Donoghue Forlines Yield Enhanced Real Asset ETF
8.60%6.64%7.05%18.89%7.42%3.86%
CDC
VictoryShares US EQ Income Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF
10.57%8.96%14.48%-4.99%-7.86%3.20%

Correlation

The correlation between DFRA and CDC is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.65

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 15, 2021

0.73

The correlation between DFRA and CDC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.

DFRA vs. CDC - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DFRA
CDC

Industrials

35.7%
2.3%

Energy

26.3%
9.5%

Basic Materials

18.5%
0.0%

Real Estate

12.1%
0.0%

Consumer Defensive

3.2%
15.9%

Utilities

2.8%
24.3%

Technology

1.5%
6.9%

Communication Services

-

4.4%

Consumer Cyclical

-

6.6%

Financial Services

-

23.4%

Healthcare

-

6.8%

Industrials

DFRA
35.7%
CDC
2.3%

Energy

DFRA
26.3%
CDC
9.5%

Basic Materials

DFRA
18.5%
CDC
0.0%

Real Estate

DFRA
12.1%
CDC
0.0%

Consumer Defensive

DFRA
3.2%
CDC
15.9%

Utilities

DFRA
2.8%
CDC
24.3%

Technology

DFRA
1.5%
CDC
6.9%

Communication Services

DFRA

-

CDC
4.4%

Consumer Cyclical

DFRA

-

CDC
6.6%

Financial Services

DFRA

-

CDC
23.4%

Healthcare

DFRA

-

CDC
6.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DFRA vs. CDC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DFRA
DFRA Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
DFRA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFRA Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFRA Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
DFRA Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFRA Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

CDC
CDC Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
CDC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CDC Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
CDC Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
CDC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
CDC Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DFRA vs. CDC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Donoghue Forlines Yield Enhanced Real Asset ETF (DFRA) and VictoryShares US EQ Income Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF (CDC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DFRACDCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.84

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.31

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.32

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.30

3.22

-1.92

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.50

11.37

-6.86

DFRA vs. CDC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DFRA Sharpe Ratio is 1.03, which is lower than the CDC Sharpe Ratio of 1.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFRA and CDC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DFRACDCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.03

1.87

-0.84

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.76

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.68

0.74

-0.07

Drawdowns

DFRA vs. CDC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFRA drawdown since its inception was -19.35%, smaller than the maximum CDC drawdown of -21.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFRA and CDC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DFRACDCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.35%

-21.37%

+2.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.64%

-5.67%

-5.97%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.35%

-12.70%

-6.65%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.37%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-21.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.31%

-2.20%

-5.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.96%

-5.09%

+1.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.36%

1.60%

+1.76%

Volatility

DFRA vs. CDC - Volatility Comparison

Donoghue Forlines Yield Enhanced Real Asset ETF (DFRA) has a higher volatility of 4.52% compared to VictoryShares US EQ Income Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF (CDC) at 2.66%. This indicates that DFRA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CDC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DFRACDCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.52%

2.66%

+1.86%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.85%

6.84%

+6.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.70%

9.77%

+4.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.52%

12.54%

+4.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.52%

13.21%

+4.31%

DFRA vs. CDC - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFRA has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than CDC's 0.37% expense ratio.


Dividends

DFRA vs. CDC - Dividend Comparison

DFRA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.20%, more than CDC's 3.18% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CDC
VictoryShares US EQ Income Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF
3.18%3.36%3.32%4.24%3.48%2.65%2.48%3.04%3.37%2.81%2.99%3.17%
DFRA
Donoghue Forlines Yield Enhanced Real Asset ETF
4.20%2.86%10.13%4.70%8.40%0.08%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


DFRA and CDC have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DFRA has higher volatility (4.52%) compared to CDC (2.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFRA dropped -19.35% vs CDC's -21.37%.

On 3-year performance, DFRA leads with 12.75% vs 11.97% for CDC. On fees, CDC is cheaper at 0.37% per year. On volatility, CDC has been the lower-risk option at 2.66%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, DFRA has performed better with a 12.75% return vs 11.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

CDC is cheaper with a 0.37% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for DFRA.

DFRA has the higher dividend yield at 4.20%, compared with 3.18% for CDC.

DFRA tracks FCF Yield Enhanced Real Asset Index - Benchmark TR Net, while CDC tracks Nasdaq Victory U.S. Large Cap High Dividend 100 Long/Cash Volatility Weighted Index. They also come from different issuers: Donoghue Forlines and Crestview. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for DFRA and 0.37% for CDC.

CDC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.87 vs 1.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DFRA and CDC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer