PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DFQTX vs. DRIWX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

DFQTX vs. DRIWX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DFA US Core Equity 2 Portfolio I (DFQTX) and Dimensional 2030 Target Date Retirement Income Fund (DRIWX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

DFQTX vs. DRIWX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DFQTX
DFA US Core Equity 2 Portfolio I
-4.02%15.99%20.27%21.88%-14.21%28.46%15.72%29.41%-9.65%18.26%
DRIWX
Dimensional 2030 Target Date Retirement Income Fund
-1.66%9.89%5.12%10.05%-22.34%13.46%18.33%21.04%-7.35%15.68%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DFQTX achieves a -4.02% return, which is significantly lower than DRIWX's -1.66% return. Over the past 10 years, DFQTX has outperformed DRIWX with an annualized return of 12.61%, while DRIWX has yielded a comparatively lower 5.87% annualized return.


DFQTX

1D
-0.54%
1M
-7.31%
YTD
-4.02%
6M
-1.55%
1Y
16.25%
3Y*
15.75%
5Y*
10.23%
10Y*
12.61%

DRIWX

1D
0.67%
1M
-5.04%
YTD
-1.66%
6M
-1.03%
1Y
6.17%
3Y*
5.63%
5Y*
2.02%
10Y*
5.87%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


DFQTX vs. DRIWX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFQTX has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than DRIWX's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

DFQTX vs. DRIWX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DFQTX
DFQTX Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
DFQTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFQTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFQTX Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
DFQTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFQTX Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

DRIWX
DRIWX Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
DRIWX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DRIWX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
DRIWX Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
DRIWX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
DRIWX Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DFQTX vs. DRIWX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DFA US Core Equity 2 Portfolio I (DFQTX) and Dimensional 2030 Target Date Retirement Income Fund (DRIWX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DFQTXDRIWXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.95

0.75

+0.20

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.45

1.08

+0.37

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.16

+0.06

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.00

0.96

+0.04

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.74

3.51

+1.23

DFQTX vs. DRIWX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DFQTX Sharpe Ratio is 0.95, which is comparable to the DRIWX Sharpe Ratio of 0.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFQTX and DRIWX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DFQTXDRIWXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

0.75

+0.20

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

0.19

+0.42

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.69

0.58

+0.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.47

0.61

-0.14

Correlation

The correlation between DFQTX and DRIWX is 0.70, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

DFQTX vs. DRIWX - Dividend Comparison

DFQTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.12%, less than DRIWX's 7.09% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DFQTX
DFA US Core Equity 2 Portfolio I
1.12%1.06%1.15%1.74%4.43%4.74%1.29%3.50%2.84%1.97%1.80%3.78%
DRIWX
Dimensional 2030 Target Date Retirement Income Fund
7.09%6.89%6.04%4.10%6.63%5.81%3.93%2.39%2.45%1.33%1.40%0.00%

Drawdowns

DFQTX vs. DRIWX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFQTX drawdown since its inception was -59.35%, which is greater than DRIWX's maximum drawdown of -27.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFQTX and DRIWX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


DFQTXDRIWXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.35%

-27.45%

-31.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.73%

-6.48%

-6.25%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.64%

-27.45%

+4.81%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.21%

-27.45%

-9.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.47%

-5.11%

-3.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.84%

-6.44%

-1.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.79%

1.78%

+1.01%

Volatility

DFQTX vs. DRIWX - Volatility Comparison

DFA US Core Equity 2 Portfolio I (DFQTX) has a higher volatility of 4.27% compared to Dimensional 2030 Target Date Retirement Income Fund (DRIWX) at 3.10%. This indicates that DFQTX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DRIWX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


DFQTXDRIWXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.27%

3.10%

+1.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.67%

4.85%

+3.82%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.07%

9.11%

+8.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.00%

10.65%

+6.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.25%

10.09%

+8.16%