DFNV vs. FEPI

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

DFNV (TrimTabs Donoghue Forlines Risk Managed Innovation ETF) and FEPI (REX FANG & Innovation Equity Premium Income ETF) are both Technology Equities funds. DFNV is passively managed, while FEPI is actively managed. Over the past year, DFNV returned 7.73% vs 33.15% for FEPI. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DFNV charges 0.69%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for FEPI.

Performance

DFNV vs. FEPI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TrimTabs Donoghue Forlines Risk Managed Innovation ETF (DFNV) and REX FANG & Innovation Equity Premium Income ETF (FEPI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DFNV achieves a 2.99% return, which is significantly lower than FEPI's 10.42% return.

DFNV

• 1D: -2.01%
• 1M: 11.80%
• YTD: 2.99%
• 6M: 1.14%
• 1Y: 7.73%
• 3Y*: 19.01%
• 5Y*: 9.69%
• 10Y*: —

FEPI

• 1D: -0.75%
• 1M: 5.91%
• YTD: 10.42%
• 6M: 11.37%
• 1Y: 33.15%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DFNV vs. FEPI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
DFNV TrimTabs Donoghue Forlines Risk Managed Innovation ETF	2.99%	8.42%	31.93%	8.92%
FEPI REX FANG & Innovation Equity Premium Income ETF	10.42%	18.33%	15.69%	11.70%

Correlation

The correlation between DFNV and FEPI is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.64
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 12, 2023	0.78

The correlation between DFNV and FEPI shifts across timeframes, from 0.64 (1 year) to 0.78 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

DFNV vs. FEPI - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	DFNV	FEPI
Technology	60.9%	62.1%
Healthcare	16.2%	-
Communication Services	12.0%	24.9%
Consumer Cyclical	9.0%	13.0%
Industrials	1.9%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

DFNV vs. FEPI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DFNV

DFNV Risk / Return Rank: 14
DFNV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 15
DFNV Sortino Ratio Rank: 15
DFNV Omega Ratio Rank: 15
DFNV Calmar Ratio Rank: 13
DFNV Martin Ratio Rank: 13

FEPI

FEPI Risk / Return Rank: 54
FEPI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
FEPI Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
FEPI Omega Ratio Rank: 58
FEPI Calmar Ratio Rank: 51
FEPI Martin Ratio Rank: 51

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DFNV vs. FEPI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TrimTabs Donoghue Forlines Risk Managed Innovation ETF (DFNV) and REX FANG & Innovation Equity Premium Income ETF (FEPI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	DFNV	FEPI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.44	2.02	-1.58
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.71	2.67	-1.96
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.09	1.36	-0.28
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.36	2.58	-2.22
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.87	8.66	-7.79
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

DFNV vs. FEPI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DFNV Sharpe Ratio is 0.44, which is lower than the FEPI Sharpe Ratio of 2.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFNV and FEPI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	DFNV	FEPI	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.44	2.02	-1.58
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.50	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.54	1.16	-0.62

Drawdowns

DFNV vs. FEPI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFNV drawdown since its inception was -29.71%, which is greater than FEPI's maximum drawdown of -23.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFNV and FEPI.

Drawdown Indicators

	DFNV	FEPI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-29.71%	-23.56%	-6.15%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-21.54%	-12.91%	-8.63%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-22.72%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-29.71%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.91%	-1.45%	-2.46%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.47%	-3.51%	-5.96%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.90%	3.84%	+5.06%

Volatility

DFNV vs. FEPI - Volatility Comparison

TrimTabs Donoghue Forlines Risk Managed Innovation ETF (DFNV) has a higher volatility of 6.59% compared to REX FANG & Innovation Equity Premium Income ETF (FEPI) at 3.31%. This indicates that DFNV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FEPI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DFNV	FEPI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.59%	3.31%	+3.28%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.86%	12.58%	+2.28%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.69%	16.54%	+1.15%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.66%	19.02%	+0.64%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.73%	19.02%	+0.71%

DFNV vs. FEPI - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFNV has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than FEPI's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

DFNV vs. FEPI - Dividend Comparison

DFNV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.37%, less than FEPI's 23.92% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
DFNV TrimTabs Donoghue Forlines Risk Managed Innovation ETF	0.37%	0.38%	1.28%	0.77%	1.20%	4.77%	0.02%
FEPI REX FANG & Innovation Equity Premium Income ETF	23.92%	25.48%	27.18%	4.21%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DFNV and FEPI in my portfolio?

DFNV and FEPI have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DFNV or FEPI?

DFNV has higher volatility (6.59%) compared to FEPI (3.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFNV dropped -29.71% vs FEPI's -23.56%.

Which ETF is better, DFNV or FEPI?

On 1-year performance, FEPI leads with 33.15% vs 7.73% for DFNV. On fees, FEPI is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, FEPI has been the lower-risk option at 3.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DFNV or FEPI?

Over the 1-year period, FEPI has performed better with a 33.15% return vs 7.73%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DFNV or FEPI?

FEPI is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for DFNV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DFNV or FEPI?

FEPI has the higher dividend yield at 23.92%, compared with 0.37% for DFNV.

What is the main difference between DFNV and FEPI?

They also come from different issuers: TrimTabs and REX. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for DFNV and 0.65% for FEPI.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FEPI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.02 vs 0.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.