DFNV vs. CHPS
Compare and contrast key facts about TrimTabs Donoghue Forlines Risk Managed Innovation ETF (DFNV) and Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF (CHPS).
DFNV and CHPS are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. DFNV is a passively managed fund by TrimTabs that tracks the performance of the TrimTabs Donoghue Forlines Risk Managed Free Cash Flow Innovation Index. It was launched on Dec 8, 2020. CHPS is a passively managed fund by Xtrackers that tracks the performance of the Solactive Semiconductor ESG Screened Index - Benchmark TR Gross. It was launched on Jul 12, 2023. Both DFNV and CHPS are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
DFNV vs. CHPS - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
DFNV vs. CHPS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
DFNV TrimTabs Donoghue Forlines Risk Managed Innovation ETF | -15.04% | 8.42% | 31.93% | 7.07% |
CHPS Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF | 12.20% | 58.47% | 7.75% | 10.88% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DFNV achieves a -15.04% return, which is significantly lower than CHPS's 12.20% return.
DFNV
- 1D
- 2.55%
- 1M
- -3.84%
- YTD
- -15.04%
- 6M
- -17.93%
- 1Y
- -2.08%
- 3Y*
- 13.16%
- 5Y*
- 6.22%
- 10Y*
- —
CHPS
- 1D
- 5.84%
- 1M
- -8.97%
- YTD
- 12.20%
- 6M
- 33.13%
- 1Y
- 95.34%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
DFNV vs. CHPS - Expense Ratio Comparison
DFNV has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than CHPS's 0.15% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
DFNV vs. CHPS — Risk / Return Rank
DFNV
CHPS
DFNV vs. CHPS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TrimTabs Donoghue Forlines Risk Managed Innovation ETF (DFNV) and Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF (CHPS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DFNV | CHPS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.10 | 2.55 | -2.64 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.01 | 3.10 | -3.08 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 1.42 | -0.42 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.10 | 5.39 | -5.49 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.29 | 18.93 | -19.21 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DFNV | CHPS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.10 | 2.55 | -2.64 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.32 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.36 | 0.98 | -0.63 |
Correlation
The correlation between DFNV and CHPS is 0.66, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
DFNV vs. CHPS - Dividend Comparison
DFNV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.44%, less than CHPS's 0.60% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFNV TrimTabs Donoghue Forlines Risk Managed Innovation ETF | 0.44% | 0.38% | 1.28% | 0.77% | 1.20% | 4.77% | 0.02% |
CHPS Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF | 0.60% | 0.68% | 1.75% | 0.36% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
DFNV vs. CHPS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DFNV drawdown since its inception was -29.71%, smaller than the maximum CHPS drawdown of -39.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFNV and CHPS.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| DFNV | CHPS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.71% | -39.44% | +9.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.54% | -17.50% | -4.04% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.71% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.92% | -12.68% | -6.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.41% | -9.63% | +0.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.45% | 4.98% | +2.47% |
Volatility
DFNV vs. CHPS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for TrimTabs Donoghue Forlines Risk Managed Innovation ETF (DFNV) is 6.11%, while Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF (CHPS) has a volatility of 13.99%. This indicates that DFNV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CHPS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| DFNV | CHPS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.11% | 13.99% | -7.88% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.00% | 26.20% | -13.20% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.67% | 37.67% | -16.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.44% | 32.80% | -13.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.64% | 32.80% | -13.16% |