DFNM vs. IBMO
DFNM (Dimensional National Municipal Bond ETF) and IBMO (iShares iBonds Dec 2026 Term Muni Bond ETF) are both Municipal Bonds funds. DFNM is actively managed, while IBMO is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, DFNM returned 3.10%/yr vs 2.80%/yr for IBMO. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DFNM charges 0.17%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for IBMO.
Performance
DFNM vs. IBMO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DFNM achieves a 1.14% return, which is significantly higher than IBMO's 1.03% return.
DFNM
- 1D
- -0.29%
- 1M
- 0.63%
- YTD
- 1.14%
- 6M
- 1.27%
- 1Y
- 4.87%
- 3Y*
- 3.10%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IBMO
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.19%
- YTD
- 1.03%
- 6M
- 1.02%
- 1Y
- 2.62%
- 3Y*
- 2.80%
- 5Y*
- 0.72%
- 10Y*
- —
DFNM vs. IBMO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFNM Dimensional National Municipal Bond ETF | 1.14% | 3.87% | 1.19% | 3.97% | -4.02% | 0.40% |
IBMO iShares iBonds Dec 2026 Term Muni Bond ETF | 1.03% | 3.11% | 1.97% | 2.90% | -5.36% | 0.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between DFNM and IBMO is 0.10, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 16, 2021 | 0.56 |
Over the past year, the correlation between DFNM and IBMO has dropped to 0.10 - well below their long-term average of 0.56, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DFNM vs. IBMO — Risk / Return Rank
DFNM
IBMO
DFNM vs. IBMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional National Municipal Bond ETF (DFNM) and iShares iBonds Dec 2026 Term Muni Bond ETF (IBMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DFNM | IBMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.41 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.16 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.63 | 1.49 | +0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.66 | 6.95 | -4.29 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.53 | 20.64 | -11.11 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DFNM vs. IBMO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DFNM drawdown since its inception was -6.99%, smaller than the maximum IBMO drawdown of -14.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFNM and IBMO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DFNM | IBMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -6.99% | -14.77% | +7.78% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.84% | -0.38% | -1.46% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -2.82% | -1.76% | -1.06% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -8.86% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.50% | 0.00% | -0.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.94% | -2.31% | +0.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.51% | 0.13% | +0.38% |
Volatility
DFNM vs. IBMO - Volatility Comparison
Dimensional National Municipal Bond ETF (DFNM) has a higher volatility of 0.51% compared to iShares iBonds Dec 2026 Term Muni Bond ETF (IBMO) at 0.22%. This indicates that DFNM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DFNM | IBMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.51% | 0.22% | +0.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.33% | 0.79% | +0.54% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.74% | 1.10% | +0.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.53% | 2.14% | +0.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.53% | 4.50% | -1.97% |
DFNM vs. IBMO - Expense Ratio Comparison
DFNM has a 0.17% expense ratio, which is lower than IBMO's 0.18% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
DFNM vs. IBMO - Dividend Comparison
DFNM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.90%, more than IBMO's 2.39% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFNM Dimensional National Municipal Bond ETF | 2.90% | 2.94% | 2.74% | 2.39% | 1.16% | 0.05% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IBMO iShares iBonds Dec 2026 Term Muni Bond ETF | 2.39% | 2.37% | 2.15% | 1.65% | 0.89% | 0.62% | 1.03% | 1.01% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DFNM and IBMO have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DFNM has higher volatility (0.51%) compared to IBMO (0.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFNM dropped -6.99% vs IBMO's -14.77%.
On 3-year performance, DFNM leads with 3.10% vs 2.80% for IBMO. On fees, DFNM is cheaper at 0.17% per year. On volatility, IBMO has been the lower-risk option at 0.22%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, DFNM has performed better with a 3.10% return vs 2.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DFNM is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for IBMO.
DFNM has the higher dividend yield at 2.90%, compared with 2.39% for IBMO.
They also come from different issuers: Dimensional and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.17% for DFNM and 0.18% for IBMO.
DFNM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.80 vs 2.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DFNM and IBMO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer