PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DFNG.L vs. XAUUSD=X
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

DFNG.L vs. XAUUSD=X - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in VanEck Defense ETF A USD Acc GBP (DFNG.L) and Gold Spot Price US Dollar (XAUUSD=X). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

DFNG.L is traded in GBP, while XAUUSD=X is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the XAUUSD=X values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DFNG.L achieves a 3.59% return, which is significantly higher than XAUUSD=X's 1.13% return.


DFNG.L

1D
0.47%
1M
-2.66%
YTD
3.59%
6M
7.13%
1Y
15.22%
3Y*
39.23%
5Y*
10Y*

XAUUSD=X

1D
-2.69%
1M
-5.99%
YTD
1.13%
6M
3.01%
1Y
31.34%
3Y*
27.08%
5Y*
19.43%
10Y*
14.26%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DFNG.L vs. XAUUSD=X - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
DFNG.L
VanEck Defense ETF A USD Acc GBP
3.59%56.54%46.20%22.89%
XAUUSD=X
Gold Spot Price US Dollar
1.13%53.01%29.46%-0.11%

Correlation

The correlation between DFNG.L and XAUUSD=X is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.15

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.11

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 6, 2023

0.10

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DFNG.L vs. XAUUSD=X — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DFNG.L
DFNG.L Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
DFNG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFNG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFNG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
DFNG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFNG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

XAUUSD=X
XAUUSD=X Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
XAUUSD=X Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XAUUSD=X Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
XAUUSD=X Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
XAUUSD=X Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
XAUUSD=X Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DFNG.L vs. XAUUSD=X - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Defense ETF A USD Acc GBP (DFNG.L) and Gold Spot Price US Dollar (XAUUSD=X). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DFNG.LXAUUSD=XDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.45

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.41

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.24

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.92

1.33

-0.40

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.28

3.40

-1.12

DFNG.L vs. XAUUSD=X - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DFNG.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.70, which is lower than the XAUUSD=X Sharpe Ratio of 1.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFNG.L and XAUUSD=X, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DFNG.LXAUUSD=XDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.70

1.15

-0.45

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.12

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.86

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.97

0.71

+1.26

Drawdowns

DFNG.L vs. XAUUSD=X - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFNG.L drawdown since its inception was -18.38%, smaller than the maximum XAUUSD=X drawdown of -41.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFNG.L and XAUUSD=X.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DFNG.LXAUUSD=XDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.38%

-41.01%

+22.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.38%

-18.58%

+0.20%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.38%

-18.58%

+0.20%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.58%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.42%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-15.37%

-18.58%

+3.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.13%

-12.44%

+9.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.46%

7.96%

-0.50%

Volatility

DFNG.L vs. XAUUSD=X - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Defense ETF A USD Acc GBP (DFNG.L) has a higher volatility of 7.88% compared to Gold Spot Price US Dollar (XAUUSD=X) at 4.50%. This indicates that DFNG.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XAUUSD=X based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DFNG.LXAUUSD=XDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.88%

4.50%

+3.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.71%

19.82%

-1.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.17%

21.48%

+2.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.38%

15.42%

+4.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.38%

15.40%

+4.98%

Frequently Asked Questions


DFNG.L and XAUUSD=X have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DFNG.L and XAUUSD=X

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer