PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DFNG.L vs. PAVE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DFNG.L vs. PAVE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in VanEck Defense ETF A USD Acc GBP (DFNG.L) and Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF (PAVE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

DFNG.L is traded in GBP, while PAVE is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the PAVE values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DFNG.L achieves a 1.28% return, which is significantly lower than PAVE's 21.48% return.


DFNG.L

1D
0.00%
1M
0.84%
YTD
1.28%
6M
2.03%
1Y
14.48%
3Y*
37.60%
5Y*
10Y*

PAVE

1D
1.10%
1M
3.18%
YTD
21.48%
6M
18.21%
1Y
39.09%
3Y*
22.61%
5Y*
19.06%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DFNG.L vs. PAVE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
DFNG.L
VanEck Defense ETF A USD Acc GBP
1.28%56.54%46.20%-1.18%
PAVE
Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF
21.48%10.86%19.98%20.95%

Correlation

The correlation between DFNG.L and PAVE is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.26

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.34

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 31, 2023

0.35

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DFNG.L vs. PAVE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DFNG.L
DFNG.L Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
DFNG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFNG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFNG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
DFNG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFNG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

PAVE
PAVE Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
PAVE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PAVE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
PAVE Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
PAVE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
PAVE Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DFNG.L vs. PAVE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Defense ETF A USD Acc GBP (DFNG.L) and Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF (PAVE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DFNG.LPAVEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.51

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.84

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.36

-0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.74

3.55

-2.81

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.83

13.28

-11.45

DFNG.L vs. PAVE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DFNG.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.59, which is lower than the PAVE Sharpe Ratio of 2.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFNG.L and PAVE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DFNG.L vs. PAVE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFNG.L drawdown since its inception was -22.59%, smaller than the maximum PAVE drawdown of -37.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFNG.L and PAVE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DFNG.LPAVEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.59%

-37.23%

+14.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.68%

-11.06%

-8.62%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.68%

-27.59%

+7.91%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-17.26%

0.00%

-17.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.98%

-5.99%

+1.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.94%

2.95%

+4.99%

Volatility

DFNG.L vs. PAVE - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Defense ETF A USD Acc GBP (DFNG.L) has a higher volatility of 8.19% compared to Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF (PAVE) at 7.12%. This indicates that DFNG.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PAVE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DFNG.LPAVEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.19%

7.12%

+1.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.02%

15.13%

+3.89%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.56%

18.64%

+5.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.38%

20.52%

+2.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.38%

23.76%

-0.38%

DFNG.L vs. PAVE - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFNG.L has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than PAVE's 0.47% expense ratio.


Dividends

DFNG.L vs. PAVE - Dividend Comparison

DFNG.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PAVE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.76%.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
DFNG.L
VanEck Defense ETF A USD Acc GBP
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PAVE
Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF
0.76%0.92%0.54%0.68%0.84%0.48%0.44%0.67%0.78%0.30%

Frequently Asked Questions


DFNG.L and PAVE have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, PAVE is cheaper at 0.47% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

PAVE is cheaper with a 0.47% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for DFNG.L.

DFNG.L is categorized as Aerospace & Defense, while PAVE is Industrials Equities. DFNG.L tracks MarketVector Global Defense Industry index, while PAVE tracks INDXX U.S. Infrastructure Development Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for DFNG.L and 0.47% for PAVE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DFNG.L and PAVE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer