PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DFNG.L vs. ESGB.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DFNG.L vs. ESGB.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in VanEck Defense ETF A USD Acc GBP (DFNG.L) and VanEck Vectors Video Gaming and eSports UCITS ETF A USD (ESGB.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DFNG.L achieves a 3.59% return, which is significantly higher than ESGB.L's -13.64% return.


DFNG.L

1D
0.47%
1M
-3.43%
YTD
3.59%
6M
5.95%
1Y
17.04%
3Y*
39.23%
5Y*
10Y*

ESGB.L

1D
-0.17%
1M
0.17%
YTD
-13.64%
6M
-17.20%
1Y
-11.47%
3Y*
16.72%
5Y*
7.72%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DFNG.L vs. ESGB.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
DFNG.L
VanEck Defense ETF A USD Acc GBP
3.59%56.54%46.20%22.89%
ESGB.L
VanEck Vectors Video Gaming and eSports UCITS ETF A USD
-13.64%18.62%51.06%7.04%

Correlation

The correlation between DFNG.L and ESGB.L is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.30

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.38

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 6, 2023

0.39

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DFNG.L vs. ESGB.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DFNG.L
DFNG.L Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
DFNG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFNG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFNG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
DFNG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFNG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

ESGB.L
ESGB.L Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
ESGB.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ESGB.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
ESGB.L Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
ESGB.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
ESGB.L Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DFNG.L vs. ESGB.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Defense ETF A USD Acc GBP (DFNG.L) and VanEck Vectors Video Gaming and eSports UCITS ETF A USD (ESGB.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DFNG.LESGB.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.39

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

0.90

+0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.92

-0.43

+1.35

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.28

-0.76

+3.04

DFNG.L vs. ESGB.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DFNG.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.70, which is higher than the ESGB.L Sharpe Ratio of -0.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFNG.L and ESGB.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DFNG.LESGB.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.70

-0.68

+1.39

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.97

0.70

+1.27

Drawdowns

DFNG.L vs. ESGB.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFNG.L drawdown since its inception was -18.38%, smaller than the maximum ESGB.L drawdown of -39.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFNG.L and ESGB.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DFNG.LESGB.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.38%

-39.40%

+21.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.38%

-26.63%

+8.25%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.38%

-26.63%

+8.25%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-15.37%

-25.21%

+9.84%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.13%

-13.09%

+9.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.46%

14.99%

-7.53%

Volatility

DFNG.L vs. ESGB.L - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Defense ETF A USD Acc GBP (DFNG.L) has a higher volatility of 7.88% compared to VanEck Vectors Video Gaming and eSports UCITS ETF A USD (ESGB.L) at 3.96%. This indicates that DFNG.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ESGB.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DFNG.LESGB.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.88%

3.96%

+3.92%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.71%

13.09%

+5.62%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.17%

16.79%

+7.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.38%

22.02%

-1.64%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.38%

22.81%

-2.43%

DFNG.L vs. ESGB.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both DFNG.L and ESGB.L have an expense ratio of 0.55%.


Dividends

DFNG.L vs. ESGB.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither DFNG.L nor ESGB.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


DFNG.L and ESGB.L have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.55% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

DFNG.L and ESGB.L have the same expense ratio: 0.55% per year.

DFNG.L is categorized as Aerospace & Defense, while ESGB.L is Technology Equities. DFNG.L tracks MarketVector Global Defense Industry index, while ESGB.L tracks MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DFNG.L and ESGB.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer