DFND vs. USPX
DFND (Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF) and USPX (Franklin U.S. Equity Index ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds - DFND tracks the Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender Index while USPX tracks the Morningstar US Target Market Exposure Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, DFND returned 4.54%/yr vs 12.39%/yr for USPX. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DFND charges 1.50%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for USPX.
Performance
DFND vs. USPX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
DFND
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- 0.00%
- 6M
- -1.09%
- 1Y
- 0.20%
- 3Y*
- 7.91%
- 5Y*
- 4.54%
- 10Y*
- 7.16%
USPX
- 1D
- -0.75%
- 1M
- 5.12%
- YTD
- 10.64%
- 6M
- 10.50%
- 1Y
- 27.42%
- 3Y*
- 22.42%
- 5Y*
- 12.39%
- 10Y*
- —
DFND vs. USPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFND Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF | 0.00% | 10.37% | 8.48% | 12.13% | -19.59% | 14.80% | 16.12% | 19.53% | -1.83% | 16.33% |
USPX Franklin U.S. Equity Index ETF | 10.64% | 17.78% | 24.97% | 27.07% | -18.88% | 19.53% | 9.72% | 26.60% | -7.78% | 23.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between DFND and USPX is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 6, 2016 | 0.48 |
Over the past year, the correlation between DFND and USPX has dropped to 0.15 - well below their long-term average of 0.48, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
DFND vs. USPX - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DFND
USPX
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Healthcare
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
Energy
Communication Services
Utilities
-
Technology
DFND
USPX
Financial Services
DFND
USPX
Industrials
DFND
USPX
Healthcare
DFND
USPX
Basic Materials
DFND
USPX
Consumer Defensive
DFND
USPX
Consumer Cyclical
DFND
USPX
Real Estate
DFND
USPX
Energy
DFND
USPX
Communication Services
DFND
USPX
Utilities
DFND
-
USPX
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DFND vs. USPX — Risk / Return Rank
DFND
USPX
DFND vs. USPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF (DFND) and Franklin U.S. Equity Index ETF (USPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DFND | USPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.26 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.01 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.02 | 1.41 | -0.39 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.07 | 3.01 | -2.94 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.13 | 13.72 | -13.60 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DFND | USPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.02 | 2.28 | -2.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.21 | 0.77 | -0.56 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.38 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.36 | 0.80 | -0.45 |
Drawdowns
DFND vs. USPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DFND drawdown since its inception was -22.65%, smaller than the maximum USPX drawdown of -31.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFND and USPX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DFND | USPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.65% | -31.21% | +8.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.44% | -9.15% | +5.71% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.56% | -19.21% | +6.65% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.65% | -24.60% | +1.95% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -22.65% | -31.21% | +8.56% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.69% | -0.75% | -2.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.70% | -4.44% | -1.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.70% | 2.00% | +1.70% |
Volatility
DFND vs. USPX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF (DFND) is 0.00%, while Franklin U.S. Equity Index ETF (USPX) has a volatility of 2.87%. This indicates that DFND experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than USPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DFND | USPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.00% | 2.87% | -2.87% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.16% | 9.16% | -3.00% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.92% | 12.09% | -1.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.46% | 16.17% | +6.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.09% | 15.92% | +3.17% |
DFND vs. USPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
DFND has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than USPX's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
DFND vs. USPX - Dividend Comparison
DFND's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.62%, less than USPX's 1.04% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFND Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF | 0.62% | 1.10% | 1.64% | 1.84% | 0.29% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.77% | 0.53% | 0.02% | 0.00% |
USPX Franklin U.S. Equity Index ETF | 1.04% | 1.07% | 1.23% | 1.35% | 2.21% | 2.40% | 2.51% | 3.07% | 2.91% | 2.60% | 4.89% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DFND and USPX have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
USPX has higher volatility (2.87%) compared to DFND (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFND dropped -22.65% vs USPX's -31.21%.
On 5-year performance, USPX leads with 12.39% vs 4.54% for DFND. On fees, USPX is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, DFND has been the lower-risk option at 0.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, USPX has performed better with a 12.39% return vs 4.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
USPX is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for DFND.
USPX has the higher dividend yield at 1.04%, compared with 0.62% for DFND.
DFND tracks Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender Index, while USPX tracks Morningstar US Target Market Exposure Index. They also come from different issuers: SRN Advisors and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for DFND and 0.03% for USPX.
USPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.28 vs 0.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DFND and USPX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer