PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DFND vs. BLCR
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

DFND vs. BLCR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF (DFND) and Blackrock Large Cap Core ETF (BLCR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

DFND vs. BLCR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
DFND
Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF
0.00%10.37%8.48%2.55%
BLCR
Blackrock Large Cap Core ETF
-1.47%30.93%17.07%14.18%

Returns By Period


DFND

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
0.00%
6M
1.11%
1Y
5.63%
3Y*
8.54%
5Y*
4.58%
10Y*
6.81%

BLCR

1D
1.63%
1M
-3.72%
YTD
-1.47%
6M
3.77%
1Y
35.80%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


DFND vs. BLCR - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFND has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than BLCR's 0.36% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

DFND vs. BLCR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DFND
DFND Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
DFND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFND Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFND Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
DFND Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFND Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank

BLCR
BLCR Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
BLCR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BLCR Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
BLCR Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
BLCR Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
BLCR Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DFND vs. BLCR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF (DFND) and Blackrock Large Cap Core ETF (BLCR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DFNDBLCRDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.38

1.70

-1.32

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.69

2.36

-1.67

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.35

-0.25

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.66

3.03

-2.37

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.59

12.57

-10.98

DFND vs. BLCR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DFND Sharpe Ratio is 0.38, which is lower than the BLCR Sharpe Ratio of 1.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFND and BLCR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DFNDBLCRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.38

1.70

-1.32

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.21

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.36

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.36

1.44

-1.08

Correlation

The correlation between DFND and BLCR is 0.16, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

DFND vs. BLCR - Dividend Comparison

DFND's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.62%, more than BLCR's 0.28% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
DFND
Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF
0.62%1.10%1.64%1.84%0.29%0.00%0.00%0.77%0.53%0.02%
BLCR
Blackrock Large Cap Core ETF
0.28%0.33%0.75%0.13%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

DFND vs. BLCR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFND drawdown since its inception was -22.65%, which is greater than BLCR's maximum drawdown of -21.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFND and BLCR.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


DFNDBLCRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.65%

-21.29%

-1.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.48%

-12.13%

+4.65%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.65%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.69%

-5.59%

+1.90%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.73%

-2.29%

-3.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.81%

2.92%

+0.89%

Volatility

DFND vs. BLCR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF (DFND) is 0.00%, while Blackrock Large Cap Core ETF (BLCR) has a volatility of 7.08%. This indicates that DFND experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BLCR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


DFNDBLCRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.00%

7.08%

-7.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.52%

12.55%

-4.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.95%

21.17%

-3.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.57%

17.60%

+4.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.14%

17.60%

+1.54%