DFMC vs. SCDS
DFMC (Dimensional US Micro Cap Portfolio ETF) and SCDS (JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Small Core ETF) are both Small Cap Blend Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DFMC charges 0.41%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for SCDS.
Performance
DFMC vs. SCDS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
DFMC
- 1D
- -1.12%
- 1M
- 1.77%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SCDS
- 1D
- -0.76%
- 1M
- 6.01%
- YTD
- 22.66%
- 6M
- 21.54%
- 1Y
- 42.67%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DFMC vs. SCDS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
DFMC Dimensional US Micro Cap Portfolio ETF | 11.97% |
SCDS JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Small Core ETF | 20.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between DFMC and SCDS is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 24, 2026 | 0.88 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DFMC vs. SCDS — Risk / Return Rank
DFMC
SCDS
DFMC vs. SCDS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional US Micro Cap Portfolio ETF (DFMC) and JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Small Core ETF (SCDS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DFMC | SCDS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.36 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 4.79 | 1.11 | +3.68 |
Drawdowns
DFMC vs. SCDS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DFMC drawdown since its inception was -4.29%, smaller than the maximum SCDS drawdown of -26.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFMC and SCDS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DFMC | SCDS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -4.29% | -26.71% | +22.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -8.85% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.12% | -0.76% | -0.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.84% | -5.28% | +4.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.54% | — |
Volatility
DFMC vs. SCDS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DFMC | SCDS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 5.58% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 12.93% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.19% | 18.20% | -2.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.19% | 21.20% | -5.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.19% | 21.20% | -5.01% |
DFMC vs. SCDS - Expense Ratio Comparison
DFMC has a 0.41% expense ratio, which is higher than SCDS's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
DFMC vs. SCDS - Dividend Comparison
DFMC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SCDS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.92%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
DFMC Dimensional US Micro Cap Portfolio ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCDS JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Small Core ETF | 0.92% | 1.15% | 0.42% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DFMC and SCDS have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SCDS is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SCDS is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.41% for DFMC.
SCDS has the higher dividend yield at 0.92%, compared with 0.00% for DFMC.
They also come from different issuers: Dimensional Fund Advisors and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.41% for DFMC and 0.40% for SCDS.
Find the right allocation for DFMC and SCDS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer