DFMC vs. DBC
DFMC (Dimensional US Micro Cap Portfolio ETF) and DBC (Invesco DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - DFMC is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Dimensional Fund Advisors, while DBC is a Commodities fund tracking the DBIQ Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Index Excess Return. DFMC is actively managed, while DBC is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.42, they often move in opposite directions. DFMC charges 0.41%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for DBC.
Performance
DFMC vs. DBC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
DFMC
- 1D
- 0.71%
- 1M
- 4.11%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DBC
- 1D
- -1.15%
- 1M
- 2.01%
- 6M
- 22.67%
- YTD
- 27.28%
- 1Y
- 31.86%
- 3Y*
- 11.51%
- 5Y*
- 11.45%
- 10Y*
- 8.52%
DFMC vs. DBC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
DFMC Dimensional US Micro Cap Portfolio ETF | 21.30% |
DBC Invesco DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund | -1.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between DFMC and DBC is -0.42, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 23, 2026 | -0.42 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DFMC vs. DBC — Risk / Return Rank
DFMC
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
DBC
DFMC vs. DBC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional US Micro Cap Portfolio ETF (DFMC) and Invesco DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund (DBC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DFMC | DBC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.29 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.94 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 6.62 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DFMC vs. DBC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DFMC drawdown since its inception was -4.29%, smaller than the maximum DBC drawdown of -76.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFMC and DBC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DFMC | DBC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -4.29% | -76.36% | +72.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -16.54% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -16.54% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -27.34% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -41.71% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.62% | -26.37% | +25.75% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.80% | -46.12% | +45.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 4.82% | — |
Volatility
DFMC vs. DBC - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DFMC | DBC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 6.03% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 16.71% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.40% | 18.85% | -3.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.40% | 19.29% | -3.89% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.40% | 17.80% | -2.40% |
DFMC vs. DBC - Expense Ratio Comparison
DFMC has a 0.41% expense ratio, which is lower than DBC's 0.85% expense ratio.
Dividends
DFMC vs. DBC - Dividend Comparison
DFMC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.22%, less than DBC's 2.61% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBC Invesco DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund | 2.61% | 3.33% | 5.22% | 4.94% | 0.59% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.59% | 1.30% |
DFMC Dimensional US Micro Cap Portfolio ETF | 0.22% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DFMC and DBC have a correlation of -0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, DFMC is cheaper at 0.41% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DFMC is cheaper with a 0.41% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for DBC.
DBC has the higher dividend yield at 2.61%, compared with 0.22% for DFMC.
DFMC is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while DBC is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: Dimensional Fund Advisors and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.41% for DFMC and 0.85% for DBC.
Find the right allocation for DFMC and DBC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer